Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
(((((PR1Berske))))I liked "Oh Doctor Beeching"
(((((PR1Berske))))I liked "Oh Doctor Beeching"
"UK ministers are considering allowing the use of a bee-killing pesticide next year despite promising during the election to ban it ..."
One government bill I don't think we've had shared is the Bank Resolution (Recapitalisation) Bill [HL]
https://bills.parliament.uk/bills/3734
Well that's clearA Bill to make provision about recapitalisation costs in relation to the special resolution regime under the Banking Act 2009.
Quite. I wrote to my MP regarding this and I received a pat reply about "the poorest pensioners". I told him that this really meant "deserving and undeserving poor". I also pointed out to him that those of us who don't have occupational or final salary pensions, but who are in receipt of the full state pension will be shafted, and added, "perhaps the aim here is to kill of as many pensioners as possible, no?" I fully expect another bullshit reply from him.Winter Fuel Allowance.
I am a new Pensioner.
I heard that the Winter Fuel Allowance was going to be abolished for people not on Pension Credit. I was disappointed.
Then they said “Pension Credit and other benefits”. I am in receipt of Housing Benefit and Council Tax Support. I thought that I would probably still qualify for the Winter Fuel Allowance.
I received a letter from the DWP yesterday. HB and CTS are not qualifying benefits.
So a far greater number of Pensioners are affected than we had been led to believe.
This is a “minor detail” to most professional politicians and their running dogs in the print and broadcast media, which is beneath their notice. It is outside their experience, and not a shit do they give that people have been messed around like this.
We you expecting a "Yup, they all vote Tory so we gotta kill 'em off" response? Just what are you hoping for, if not a "we're all in this together, blahblah, fiscal hole, Tories, blahblah, don't worry, you're next"?Quite. I wrote to my MP regarding this and I received a pat reply about "the poorest pensioners". I told him that this really meant "deserving and undeserving poor". I also pointed out to him that those of us who don't have occupational or final salary pensions, but who are in receipt of the full state pension will be shafted, and added, "perhaps the aim here is to kill of as many pensioners as possible, no?" I fully expect another bullshit reply from him.
I hope so too. There's been a lot of scare-mongering about it based on the fact that Canada have royally fucked up their assisted dying system. But it seems to me that you can use examples like that in order to avoid their mistakes and ensure it is just a humane last-ditch option to hasten the inevitable.I hope they vote for the assisted dying bill; I've written to my MP asking for them to vote for it. I'd rather pick when I go than be forced to die in pain.
New Labour government - legislative agenda
I don't believe it's worth starting a separate thread for private members bills of note (both good and bonkers, and there are plenty of bonkers ones tabled to make a point) though if the Forum leans that way I will reconsider.
Ones I've spotted of late by non-government members include:
A Bill to make provision about recapitalisation costs in relation to the special resolution regime under the Banking Act 2009.
Well that's clear
arguably she should have been expelled and deselected , but doing so would have handed her the publicity of being a martyr for Gender Crank wank-addled pornsick fantasisingShe's a thorn in the side of the party for a while, mind. Her views on transgender rights has put her on the fringes of the PLP for years.
Fair. I spend some time on another forum where space is at a premium and starting new threads all the time is not encouraged. Sometimes I think I come here with that frame of mind. Lesson to learn (one of many).One potential issue that may arise is why material that has nothing to do with "New Labour government - legislative agenda" is being included on an internet forum thread, the stated subject matter of which is "New Labour government - legislative agenda".
It is possible that some people may wonder why you wish to divert the thread away from its fairly clearly stated subject matter.
Fair. I spend some time on another forum where space is at a premium and starting new threads all the time is not encouraged. Sometimes I think I come here with that frame of mind. Lesson to learn (one of many).
Yet wage theft costs over £32m to workers every year. Priorities eh?
Very welcome, a small step towards overhauling that place.As I'm sure is welcomed by the forum (whether it goes far enough or not for now), Lords Reform clears an early stage
House of Lords: MPs back ending all hereditary peers - BBC News
The proposals will now undergo further scrutiny in the Lords, where they are expected to face tough opposition.www.bbc.co.uk
Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said:
The NHS is broken, but imagine its enormous potential if each part of the system communicated properly with each other.
That starts with sharing vital medical records between healthcare providers, because it shouldn’t be the patient’s responsibility to join the dots for their doctor.
How can a GP diagnose a problem without knowing about someone’s recent hospital surgery?
This Bill and our Ten Year Health Plan will ensure important data flows safely and securely through the NHS, freeing up staff time and speeding up patient care.
I know people worry about Big Brother, which is why data will only be shared to the most relevant staff and anybody using data must comply with strict security protocols.