He looks like Catherine Tate doing himHe looks really very ill indeed.
Kremlin lackey.
Interesting selection of headlines, dates, papers and choices of whether headlines are attributed to a source.
Personally though, I do believe the Zelensky government was balls deep in grift, but that won't really come as a shock to many here.For many, these revelations are at odds with the anti-corruption platform that brought Zelenskiy and his team power. That said, not all of the financial activities outlined in the Pandora Papers are necessarily illegal. Indeed, the ability to capitalise on legal loopholes is what makes the offshore service industry the booming business it is today.
What's the point anyway. That it's a good thing Russia invaded is the only point I can see.Interesting selection of headlines, dates, papers and choices of whether headlines are attributed to a source.
Lets start from the top...
- Guardian - date unreadable
- Vox - Date unreadable
- 4 unattributed headlines (no dates)
- New Europe 15/4/21 - New Europe's tag line is "Leading Europes Conservative movement" - not a source I would trust to tell me the time frankly.
- BNE Intel news - A fairly new source that I have no opinion on, but the second paragraph of that story also notes
Personally though, I do believe the Zelensky government was balls deep in grift, but that won't really come as a shock to many here.
Whilst all these headlines are probably real, the lack of context makes them pretty much worthless.
- What looks like a Guardian header from 6 years ago
- An undated Reuters headline
In that BNE Intel news article it also notes that Russia comes second. Maybe they're hoping for the top spot by taking Ukraine?What's the point anyway. That it's a good thing Russia invaded is the only point I can see.
I don't think AA comes from a Putin cheerleading position, it's more like force 10 whataboutery.What's the point anyway. That it's a good thing Russia invaded is the only point I can see.
Interesting selection of headlines, dates, papers and choices of whether headlines are attributed to a source.
But he is bothered...He looks like Catherine Tate doing him
More thinking of the person who made it.I don't think AA comes from a Putin cheerleading position, it's more like force 10 whataboutery.
I see you’ve learned to rename your images before posting.
Quite possibly as their choice of media is unusual and their understanding of the context of the articles might mean English ain't their first language.More thinking of the person who made it.
Haha. I noticed that as well.I see you’ve learned to rename your images before posting.
Well they are actually reporting about Ukraine there as well. Lviv (Lwow) was controlled by Poland in '37. The poorer peasants from round them ends tended towards being ethnically Ukrainian and the landlords Polish. This was also how anti-Semitism was able to be so successfully weaponised, with the Nazi's and OUN-B/UPA associating Polish landlords/middle classes with being Jewish.
This article is fairly informative:He looks really very ill indeed.
How trustworthy is the source?This article is fairly informative:
I disagree and I never claimed it was.Russia, famously incorruptible and paragons of virtue.