Wasn't there talk that Bakhmut was deliberately drawn out so as to cut down the flower of Ukraine's youth (and the nettles of its middle-aged) in a futile battle, while also ridding Russia of some turbulent Wagnerites?Why? If this business has demonstrated anything it's that the armed forces of the Russian Federation pose zero conventional threat to NATO. It took them a year to take the 36km2 of Bakhmut so the notion that the 3rd Guards Motorised Rapist Division is going to waltz into downtown Vilnius in the face of an Article 5 declaration is ludicrous.
This is the sort of bullshit we used to rely on Ern for!Zelensky increasingly resembles Hitler in his bunker in March '45. The tyrant grows desperate as his domestic support crumbles and takes solace in imaginary victories by imaginary troops. In despair he dreams of rescue by foreign allies whose attention long ago turned elsewhere. Only difference is Zelensky has his mansion in Miami to fall back on
.
Wagner group aren't doing much at the moment.That's not going to work. You can't recruit mercenaries on the same scale you conscript, and by the time Ukraine is "down to its last man" there isn't going to be the money or C&C to operate a mercenary army of the size required.
Does this mean they’re going to create an X Account and stick a Ukraine flag in their profile ?For me it means sitting in class with students saying they want to kill Russians.
Perhaps a little excessively cynical...?Does this mean they’re going to create an X Account and stick a Ukraine flag in their profile ?
It probably doesn't mean that they want to enough to ever consider taking any concrete steps towards doing it, though.Perhaps a little excessively cynical...?
They're adult students from Ukraine here on short term courses, for obvious reasons mostly female.It probably doesn't mean that they want to enough to ever consider taking any concrete steps towards doing it, though.
Why are they not fighting, are they too young? Who are these students - are they school students? Are they in the UK or Ukraine or somewhere else?
A range of things. Some would join up. Some would bribe recruiters to be listed as infirm and thus exempt, some would suddenly take up university studies, some would hide in Ukraine, some would escape across the borders, some would totally focus on graft.We had a Ukrainian family living with us last year. One of their friends came over with their 17 year old son.
He'll be 18 now. I wonder if he's gone back to fight. He's from Kherson which is getting hit by Russian missiles regularly. His home, his school, his friends. What's happened to them?
What would any of us do in that situation?
To be fair, you do tend more to the curmudgeonly than the idealistic, so it is possible that you may not represent the youth of Ukraine quite as closely as you think.If I believed these things to be true:
Then I'd feel even less enthusiastic about volunteering myself as cannon fodder than I would otherwise.
- Without external i.e. foreign support, my home country had no hope of holding back an occupation
- That external support was being provided at a level that appeared simply to be enabling a kind of stalemate
- That external support would probably be ramped up if the occupiers started to gain substantial territory
To be fair, you do tend more to the curmudgeonly than the idealistic, so it is possible that you may not represent the youth of Ukraine quite as closely as you think.
Not too sure where you got the impression that he thinks.To be fair, you do tend more to the curmudgeonly than the idealistic, so it is possible that you may not represent the youth of Ukraine quite as closely as you think.
Ex-Nato chief proposes Ukraine joins without Russian-occupied territories
Former secretary general says partial membership would warn Russia it cannot stop Ukraine joining the alliancewww.theguardian.com
this points to exactly what ive been imagining to happen - a new defacto border is created, with Russia taking the occupied territories for now, remaining UKRAINE join EU and NATO, NATO polices the border to stop any future advance from Russia, perhaps one day the border will change again
people arguing "You Cant Trust Russia not to advance further in a peace deal", i say again its not about trust, its about the border being heavily militarised and in this proposal officially by NATO. Joining EU seems to be being pushed through the procedural steps also
It would be great for what's left of Ukraine but I don't see how NATO benefit from taking on a bombed out, corrupt wreck of a shit hole country that has a bitter and unresolved border dispute with its belligerent neighbour.
It would also require a change in NATO'S constitution and some staggering bribery and persuasion so the usual suspects won't veto it. Turkey, Hungary, Slovakia, etc.
Russia isn’t going to agree to that, This War started because Russia didn’t want a NATO Country on its border and there’s no way they’d trust the West not to try and get back the occupied backEx-Nato chief proposes Ukraine joins without Russian-occupied territories
Former secretary general says partial membership would warn Russia it cannot stop Ukraine joining the alliancewww.theguardian.com
this points to exactly what ive been imagining to happen - a new defacto border is created, with Russia taking the occupied territories for now, remaining UKRAINE join EU and NATO, NATO polices the border to stop any future advance from Russia, perhaps one day the border will change again
people arguing "You Cant Trust Russia not to advance further in a peace deal", i say again its not about trust, its about the border being heavily militarised and in this proposal officially by NATO. Joining EU seems to be being pushed through the procedural steps also
If I believed these things to be true:
Then I'd feel even less enthusiastic about volunteering myself as cannon fodder than I would otherwise.
- Without external i.e. foreign support, my home country had no hope of holding back an occupation
- That external support was being provided at a level that appeared simply to be enabling a kind of stalemate
- That external support would probably be ramped up if the occupiers started to gain substantial territory
The point is that the same could be achieved by a settlement that simply agreed a border where the static frontline is. All those people could carry on with their lives, but in addition the current de facto border could stop being a mass killing machine.Stalemate sounds shit but what it means in practice is lots of people being able to stay in their homes and carry on with their lives, rather than being killed/forced to flee/trapped under Russian occupation/kidnapped to Bumfuckigrad Russia with little prospect of ever coming back. The fighting the Ukrainians are doing is not for nothing.
The point is that the same could be achieved by a settlement that simply agreed a border where the static frontline is. All those people could carry on with their lives, but in addition the current de facto border could stop being a mass killing machine.
If, despite the encouraging sales of "Crimea Beach Party" T-shirts, "the west" is not actually ever going to provide Ukraine with sufficient resources to push Russia back to the former borders, then that front line is just going to stay there, with people dying every day.
How do you think Russia will rearm over the next couple of years? It's now or never for Vladimir VladimirovichAnd the Russians would stick to that settlement would they? And not simply regroup, rearm and have another go in a year's time, only this time starting off a couple of hundred kilometres closer to Kyiv?
Your feelings is not a criteria of what is true or false.Proxy war really puts the emphasis on the last couple of years of Putin blowing up kids as the fault of the US that is really quite insulting even just in terms of stripping Russia of agency and motive of its own
Are notYour feelings is not a criteria of what is true or false.