Same paper , day before:Furious MPs condemn Corbyn's response to Salisbury nerve agent attack
Labour leader accused of 'policy of appeasement' after refusing to directly blame Russia for poisoning former spywww.independent.co.uk
Just sayin'
Furious MPs condemn Corbyn's response to Salisbury nerve agent attack
Labour leader accused of 'policy of appeasement' after refusing to directly blame Russia for poisoning former spywww.independent.co.uk
Just sayin'
What are your thoughts on this analysis?Britain cannot yet say Russia is responsible for the destruction of the Nova Kakhovka dam, prime minister Rishi Sunak has said on Wednesday.
The US “cannot say conclusively” who was responsible for the destruction of the dam, national security council spokesperson John Kirby said on Tuesday.
Seismic analysis indicates an explosion led to the failure of the Kakhovka dam.
Seismiske signaler er registrert fra eksplosjon ved Kakhovka-demningen i Ukraina - jordskjelv.no
NORSAR har analysert seismiske signaler fra regionale stasjoner i forbindelse med kollapsen av demningen i Ukraina natt til tirsdag.www.jordskjelv.no
Data from regional seismic stations show clear signals on Tuesday 6 June at 2:54 local time (01:54 Norwegian time). Time and place coincide with reports in the media about the collapse of the Kakhovka dam. The signals indicate that there is an explosion.
Magnitude estimate is between 1 and 2.
The figure below shows the signal from the Bukovina (BURAR) seismic array, a measuring station in Romania. Distance from the dam is 620 km.
The Russians have just established a 60 mile zone in which the Ukrainians probably can't attack them for now. Massively underestimating the Ukrainians has what has led the Russians into this sorry state of affairs.An ex military bod on R4 news said the Russians have just established a 60 mile zone in which the Ukranians can't attack them.
Fuck , I was really getting into the natural causes stuffSeismic analysis indicates an explosion led to the failure of the Kakhovka dam.
Seismiske signaler er registrert fra eksplosjon ved Kakhovka-demningen i Ukraina - jordskjelv.no
NORSAR har analysert seismiske signaler fra regionale stasjoner i forbindelse med kollapsen av demningen i Ukraina natt til tirsdag.www.jordskjelv.no
Russ the geologist.The Seismic Data from that Dam breach actually looks more like what you see from a sudden collapse and not an explosion
The Seismic Data from that Dam breach actually looks more like what you see from a sudden collapse and not an explosion
Is that your expert opinion or are you walting as a seismologist?The Seismic Data from that Dam breach actually looks more like what you see from a sudden collapse and not an explosion
It’s worked out pretty well for the Ukrainians, Now they’ve got a good excuse for not launching a counter offensiveThere can be absolutely no doubt Russia did this on purpose. Of course they did. And right at the time a counteroffensive was starting, in order to stall it. Putting Kiev in a difficult position.
They just have launched a counter offensive, that's why Russia (probably) blew the dam.It’s worked out pretty well for the Ukrainians, Now they’ve got a good excuse for not launching a counter offensive
It’s worked out pretty well for the Ukrainians, Now they’ve got a good excuse for not launching a counter offensive
Yep. 70 ton tanks don't work too well on boggy ground. They lose their advantage in speed and maneuverability. I suppose the Ukrainian and NATO planners thought 'well it's inevitable...'.They just have launched a counter offensive, that's why Russia (probably) blew the dam.
Any idea of the name? (One in mind)An ex military bod on R4 news said the Russians have just established a 60 mile zone in which the Ukranians can't attack them.
Counterattack further east.Yep. 70 ton tanks don't work too well on boggy ground. They lose their advantage in speed and maneuverability. I suppose the Ukrainian and NATO planners thought 'well it's inevitable...'.
Curious to see what contingencies they've thought up (if any).
think it was frank gardner- long time bbc security correspondant. Ex army. Always had him down as a spook or "mi5 asset" tbh.Any idea of the name? (One in mind)
That's a lot of people without potable water
OK. You got me there. But it does limit the possible locations for a counterattack.Counterattack further east.
More occupied territory not flooded than is.OK. You got me there. But it does limit the possible locations for a counterattack.
Not who I was thinking ofthink it was frank gardner- long time bbc security correspondant. Ex army. Always had him down as a spook or "mi5 asset" tbh.
Ukraine weren't going to launch any counterattack through the now flooded regions anyway.OK. You got me there. But it does limit the possible locations for a counterattack.
Hearts and minds rffort there will do them more good than any offensiveUkraine weren't going to launch any counterattack through the now flooded regions anyway.