WouldBe
Dislicksick
Careless smoking if the dam had being rigged with explosives.What natural causes?
Careless smoking if the dam had being rigged with explosives.What natural causes?
Bloody moles.According to the Association of State Dam Safety Officials ( slogan - A future Where All Dams Are Safe) . Perosnally if we are going with natural causes I quite like Animal Activity
View attachment 377942
Beavers, usually.Bloody moles.
They usually build dams not destroy them.Beavers, usually.
By "natural causes" I meant more along the lines that they were intentionally filling the reservoir beyond design capacity, but that it failed in a disorganised way rather then someone twisting a knob.
PedantThis definition of “natural causes” makes David Attenborough’s babies cry.
Apart from a quarter of them being Canadian and others being Australian I suppose they wereThe Dam Busters were Brits though, weren't they? Classic NATO style op this.
Canada is in NATO.Apart from a quarter of them being Canadian and others being Australian I suppose they were
Even in 1943 Canadians objected to being called brits. And no one was in nato in 1943Canada is in NATO.
True but this dam was blown up in 2023.Even in 1943 Canadians objected to being called brits. And no one was in nato in 1943
And Flight Lt Munro would like to inform you that Kiwi's object to being called Australian.Even in 1943 Canadians objected to being called brits. And no one was in nato in 1943
TBF, that was 80 years ago, and blowing up dams was not a war crime (at least legally speaking) then.The Dam Busters were Brits though, weren't they? Classic NATO style op this.
you can't use the phrases 'to be fair' and 'legally speaking' in the same sentence without creating an inherent contradiction.TBF, that was 80 years ago, and blowing up dams was not a war crime (at least legally speaking) then.
And there has been plenty of fair criticism since about the action. This does not excuse Russia for its actions.
How we are treatedPedantry and sophistry
All that would really do is to make it difficult for Ukraine to launch an attack into southwestern Ukraine, which was never likely to be a huge part of the operation, given that they'd have had to fend off the Russians in the south who were to the west of them. If they were going to launch a southbound attack, it'd be likely to be further East with the intention of cutting off Russian forces to the West. As things stand, they'll just be slightly soggier Russian forces.Can this be a clever move by Russia to make a barrier against the upcoming offensive from Ukraine, especially making the ground unsuitable for heavy tanks?
Going to have another look at the map
I feel like maybe you haven't been paying much attention to my other postsTBF, that was 80 years ago, and blowing up dams was not a war crime (at least legally speaking) then.
And there has been plenty of fair criticism since about the action. This does not excuse Russia for its actions.
A bucket may be more appropriate right now.What has happened to the Russian shovel situation? The last time I read anything about it on here around March the Russians ( those that are fighting on the Russian side) couldn't get rifles etc to the front and they were having to share shovels as weapons. Have things improved? Have they got a shovel each yet?
USA officials reckon it started on Monday.So has the counter offensive started yet or are we going to wait as long as the next season of The Last of Us?