The39thStep
Urban critical thinker
Yes he is nuanced , if that is a phrase that adequately describes starting of with a conclusion ( incidentally from The End of History , a book that he was not only associated with but authored) of:I read one of Fukayama's books (The Origins of Political Order) and he is actually a much more nuanced thinker than his association with the 90s "End of History" triumphalism would suggest.
I actually found his historical teleology to be surprisingly similar to Marxism, recognising early slave societies as the origins of class society, and viewing some form of tribal democracy (analagous to "primitive communism" in Marxism) as the "natural" human order which class society has alienated us from. His "end of history" conclusion, at least from the book I've read, doesn't actually mention capitalism - he concludes that a triumvirate of political accountability, rule of law, and a strong state are the "final" form of political order, balancing the naturally democratic tendencies of human nature against the demands of large scale and complex economic organisation. In principle, this isn't incompatible with Democratic Socialism, it is only incompatible with Marxist-Leninist "Democratic Centralism" which in practise lacks accountability and rule of law (i.e. executive state power is subject to no serious legal constraints).
But anyway I think the western left could do with reverting to a recognition of "bourgeois revolution" to bring basic rule of law and Parliamentary democracy as something progressive instead of dismissing global south demands for basic democratic accountability as imperialist plots. Liberals (in the political sense) are not the biggest enemy in the world today - if the spread of authoritarian capitalism isn't beaten back then there we won't even have the space to organise a working class movement, and authoritarian capitalism (especially China) also hinders the necessary emergence of an international workers movement as it is impossible to communicate and organise safely with Chinese workers who play an integral role in the world economy, and without whom an international workers movement could never succeed.
I view the Ukraine war as something like a bourgeois-democratic revolution against whatever you call Russia's system (there isn't really a name for it, but it seems defined by dictatorial power operating in the interests of a small number of oligarchs competing for influence and favour with the leader) and support it on that basis. I don't think we can take basic democratic rights for granted these days, and reestablishing the old link between socialist politics and democratic politics is key to reviving socialism as a global force, because it is the only way for Western leftists to make common cause with global south (including Ukraine here, maybe) struggles for basic democratic rights.
“The egalitarianism of modern America represents the essential achievement of the classless society envisioned by Marx.”
and then seeing class as important when it came to explaining the rise of Trump and then admitting Marx was right on certain issues .
So yes , nuanced , eclectic, magpie and often opportunistic , and he doesn’t in fact understand Marx .