I have a terrible feeling that we may see a nuclear attack on Kherson in the next few weeks. I think the Russians will abandon the city before they do it, but blame it on Ukraine as re-draw the chronology.
Paranoia level = medium-high
It's not paranoia.
I fully expect a nuclear/radiological (but probably nuclear) detonation on Ukrainian soil. i would now be more surprised if there wasn't one than if there was.
50/50 a pitifully bad attempt at a false-flag, or an open state attack - false-flag would tend towards radiological, open state would tend towards nuclear.
Isn't that NATOs line after which they get fully involved. A how will the Russians react? Its pretty terrifying.
Tbh it's more likely to me they've done it so there are fewer people telling the Ukrainians where the defences and prepared positions arei guess that's why they have tried to clear the civilians out of the city, it wont look quite as bad to the rest of the world when they do it if its mostly enemy soldiers that get killed.
A 'tankie'? Is that an acronym for something?
As a person with Jewish heritage, I've never 'massively enjoyed' anti Semitism.
Scary times bro. Hopefully they won’t blow our world up.What do the Chinese do if Putin uses nukes? They have perhaps even more reason not to want that genie out of the bottle than the West given their reliance on large scale armies.
Putin is demonstrating that he is not rational by our / any normal standards.
and that worries me.
it's weird how frequently people are othered as 'irrational' when is really meant is we don't understand the reasons for their decisions.Problem is the nuclear deterrent [MAD] requires the command / political system to be rational, even at the "tactical" scale.
Putin is demonstrating that he is not rational by our / any normal standards.
and that worries me.
It's weird how people so often other themselves as "irrational" (or stupid/ridiculous) when they don't understand the reasons for their OWN decisions...it's weird how frequently people are othered as 'irrational' when is really meant is we don't understand the reasons for their decisions.
It's not paranoia.
I fully expect a nuclear/radiological (but probably nuclear) detonation on Ukrainian soil. i would now be more surprised if there wasn't one than if there was.
50/50 a pitifully bad attempt at a false-flag, or an open state attack - false-flag would tend towards radiological, open state would tend towards nuclear.
What do the Chinese do if Putin uses nukes? They have perhaps even more reason not to want that genie out of the bottle than the West given their reliance on large scale armies.
In public perhaps. But once the the nuclear genie is out of the bottle, in that use of a tactical weapon has happened, then any beach landing in Taiwan becomes much much harder (and its already difficult - or will be once the PLA Navy have build enough sealift capacity, its probably impossible until the ships are commissioned in a few years). A beach landing site being almost designed as a perfect target for a battlefield weapon, or which the Americans have loads, probably conveniently some on carriers.Let's presume Russia makes a lame attempt at a false flag dirty bomb or tactical nuke.
The Chinese government will officially play neutral and say "let's wait for the facts to emerge" while unofficially pumping out astro-turfed conspiracy theories that Ukraine did it all over Chinese social-media.
In public perhaps. But once the the nuclear genie is out of the bottle, in that use of a tactical weapon has happened, then any beach landing in Taiwan becomes much much harder (and its already difficult - or will be once the PLA Navy have build enough sealift capacity). A beach landing site being almost designed as a perfect target for a battlefield weapon, or which the Americans have loads, probably conveniently some on carriers.
They appear to be describing a new type of weapon, that is a nuclear missile that remains in orbit until needed. Do we know if these exist or not?Note to the US - a nuclear war can be won by rivals - Global Times
www.globaltimes.cn
You may find it slightly hair raising to learn that China's Global Times newspaper is publishing rticles about how a nuclear war can be won.
They appear to be describing a new type of weapon, that is a nuclear missile that remains in orbit until needed. Do we know if these exist or not?
They appear to be describing a new type of weapon, that is a nuclear missile that remains in orbit until needed. Do we know if these exist or not?
Note to the US - a nuclear war can be won by rivals - Global Times
www.globaltimes.cn
You may find it slightly hair raising to learn that China's Global Times newspaper is publishing rticles about how a nuclear war can be won.
They don’t have much choice if they want to save face I suppose. It’s going to be Khersongrad . GrimIsn’t it more likely that the Russians are digging in and preparing to defend Kherson by conventional means?
Who Is Franz Gayl? Pentagon Worker Takes Heat for Op-Eds in Chinese Media
"If we don't talk about this now, we are going to sleepwalk into this conflict," Gayl said of a potential military action between the U.S. and China.www.newsweek.com
Thought it was Dr R North whom addressed issue of lack of IED vehichle protection in Iraq