Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

I have a terrible feeling that we may see a nuclear attack on Kherson in the next few weeks. I think the Russians will abandon the city before they do it, but blame it on Ukraine as re-draw the chronology.

Paranoia level = medium-high

It's not paranoia.

I fully expect a nuclear/radiological (but probably nuclear) detonation on Ukrainian soil. i would now be more surprised if there wasn't one than if there was.

50/50 a pitifully bad attempt at a false-flag, or an open state attack - false-flag would tend towards radiological, open state would tend towards nuclear.
 
It's not paranoia.

I fully expect a nuclear/radiological (but probably nuclear) detonation on Ukrainian soil. i would now be more surprised if there wasn't one than if there was.

50/50 a pitifully bad attempt at a false-flag, or an open state attack - false-flag would tend towards radiological, open state would tend towards nuclear.

Isn't that NATOs line after which they get fully involved. A how will the Russians react? Its pretty terrifying.
 
Isn't that NATOs line after which they get fully involved. A how will the Russians react? Its pretty terrifying.

It's straight forward Russian, as well as Putin, exceptionalism. He thinks he can always escalate further than the other guy because eventually the other guy will cave when faced with the true might, power, and stoicism of Mother Russia/Putin.

If you study his political history, when faced with a shit position, he almost always escalates and it usually serves him well.

He takes the view that ther people's red lines are just guidelines, his are rock solid - and in truth, the west has fed him that diet over the lest 20 years.
 
i guess that's why they have tried to clear the civilians out of the city, it wont look quite as bad to the rest of the world when they do it if its mostly enemy soldiers that get killed.
 
i guess that's why they have tried to clear the civilians out of the city, it wont look quite as bad to the rest of the world when they do it if its mostly enemy soldiers that get killed.
Tbh it's more likely to me they've done it so there are fewer people telling the Ukrainians where the defences and prepared positions are
 
A 'tankie'? Is that an acronym for something?

As a person with Jewish heritage, I've never 'massively enjoyed' anti Semitism.

Tankie as used in the present has been revived by social media-dwelling youths to handily identify the resurgent Marxism-Leninism/Stalinism of their contemporaries. Like others have posted, it derives from defenders of Soviet imperialism, starting with the Hungarian intervention to crush the uprising of 1956, and extends to the crude anti-imperialism of the mid-late twentieth century.
 
What do the Chinese do if Putin uses nukes? They have perhaps even more reason not to want that genie out of the bottle than the West given their reliance on large scale armies.
Scary times bro. Hopefully they won’t blow our world up.

I read a quote from William Shatner about when he went up to space (ish) in Bezos’ cockrocket. Remember he was tearful when he came down (as I’m sure we all would be)? He said it was partly because all he saw was was death. Cold space. No life. I think every fucking politician with their hands on our future should be forced to make that journey so they understand how rare our planet is.

eta:
 
Problem is the nuclear deterrent [MAD] requires the command / political system to be rational, even at the "tactical" scale.

Putin is demonstrating that he is not rational by our / any normal standards.
and that worries me.
 
It's not paranoia.

I fully expect a nuclear/radiological (but probably nuclear) detonation on Ukrainian soil. i would now be more surprised if there wasn't one than if there was.

50/50 a pitifully bad attempt at a false-flag, or an open state attack - false-flag would tend towards radiological, open state would tend towards nuclear.

False flag. It doesn't matter if it isn't particularly convincing, as long as the narrative is out there they can sow some degree of confusion and doubt and provide handy excuses for those who would support them regardless.
 
What do the Chinese do if Putin uses nukes? They have perhaps even more reason not to want that genie out of the bottle than the West given their reliance on large scale armies.

Let's presume Russia makes a lame attempt at a false flag dirty bomb or tactical nuke.

The Chinese government will officially play neutral and say "let's wait for the facts to emerge" while unofficially pumping out astro-turfed conspiracy theories that Ukraine did it all over Chinese social-media.
 
Let's presume Russia makes a lame attempt at a false flag dirty bomb or tactical nuke.

The Chinese government will officially play neutral and say "let's wait for the facts to emerge" while unofficially pumping out astro-turfed conspiracy theories that Ukraine did it all over Chinese social-media.
In public perhaps. But once the the nuclear genie is out of the bottle, in that use of a tactical weapon has happened, then any beach landing in Taiwan becomes much much harder (and its already difficult - or will be once the PLA Navy have build enough sealift capacity, its probably impossible until the ships are commissioned in a few years). A beach landing site being almost designed as a perfect target for a battlefield weapon, or which the Americans have loads, probably conveniently some on carriers.

The Chinese are probably already switching to an economic & political lead strategy for getting Taiwan 'back', In a world where tactical nuclear weapons are in play any military plan would move from very difficult to almost impossible.
 
In public perhaps. But once the the nuclear genie is out of the bottle, in that use of a tactical weapon has happened, then any beach landing in Taiwan becomes much much harder (and its already difficult - or will be once the PLA Navy have build enough sealift capacity). A beach landing site being almost designed as a perfect target for a battlefield weapon, or which the Americans have loads, probably conveniently some on carriers.

You may find it slightly hair raising to learn that China's Global Times newspaper is publishing rticles about how a nuclear war can be won.
 
They appear to be describing a new type of weapon, that is a nuclear missile that remains in orbit until needed. Do we know if these exist or not?

Could have been built anytime since the 50s banned by treaty. Not sure the Chinese would want to change that given the relative experience of them in space v the US.
 

You may find it slightly hair raising to learn that China's Global Times newspaper is publishing rticles about how a nuclear war can be won.

Thought it was Dr R North whom addressed issue of lack of IED vehichle protection in Iraq
 

Thought it was Dr R North whom addressed issue of lack of IED vehichle protection in Iraq

There's a bit of a record of Chinese propaganda just making up imaginary foreigners.

E.g. Swiss Biologist "Wilson Edwards".

 
Back
Top Bottom