Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

Well a few days ago Liz Truss was talking about Putin going into the Balkans and Baltics next - she clearly must've seen the briefings as she is foreign secretary. I thought she was getting carried away for effect, but Biden is saying it too now:
"He has much larger ambitions than Ukraine. He wants to, in fact, re-establish the former Soviet Union. That’s what this is about”

US intelligence seems to have been proved right up till now. I fear they have evidence to make that above claim.
That really is reason to be scared of whats coming. I just pray they've got that wrong
 
This is the statement that is going to get 11 MPs kicked out of the Labour Party


the last line is important for the context of this thread though and the talk about treasonous anti-NATO sentiment etc:
"We send our solidarity to all those campaigning for an end to the war, often under very difficult conditions, in Russia and Ukraine. Stop the War can best support them by demanding a change in Britain’s own policy, which can be seen to have failed."

Living in Britain as a citizen and subject my already very limited agency is only on the role of the British state. We have no influence on Putin, but we do have potential influence on our own state. It is right that our criticisms begin at home

I’m sure Stop The War urging things to stop will change Putins mind. The statement comes across as preachy and futile. Not sure it helps anyone.
 
how would him trying to rebuild the iron curtain be the west fault and not just the wishes of a power hungry dictator?
 
how would him trying to rebuild the iron curtain be the west fault and not just the wishes of a power hungry dictator?
You think I'm somehow a fanboy but I'm not. He is a dictator. He thought the collapse of the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20th century. So what do you think he might want to do?
 
i don't think you are a fan boy you were blaming the west for the actions of someone who is finally let the world see his true intentions

was finding it odd

what will he do as much as he his allowed to, he has bombed maldova as well as the ukraine
 
I do wonder where he will stop? And what could stop him, will Nato stand up and be counted?
He will not launch an attack on a NATO nation. Try to destabilise by indirect means, sure. But the very core of NATO is built around the ‘an attack on any of us is an attack on us all’. Basically risking the start of WWIII and potential worldwide ruination. Won’t do it.

Any neighbouring non-NATO countries that he might consider of high strategic value though, your guess is as good as mine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ax^
Well a few days ago Liz Truss was talking about Putin going into the Balkans and Baltics next - she clearly must've seen the briefings as she is foreign secretary. I thought she was getting carried away for effect, but Biden is saying it too now:
"He has much larger ambitions than Ukraine. He wants to, in fact, re-establish the former Soviet Union. That’s what this is about”

US intelligence seems to have been proved right up till now. I fear they have evidence to make that above claim.
That really is reason to be scared of whats coming. I just pray they've got that wrong

Of course even if he doesn't have that intention, no-one is now going to trust that he doesn't. There is going to be large numbers of NATO on his border for the forseeable future.
 
I once read a short story by Robert Sheckley about some bloke who lands on a planet somewhere and almost immediately becomes supreme president, or some such title. He can make any decision he likes. What nobody had told him, however, was that as soon as his approval rating falls below 50% he is executed. I think that system should be tried in Russia. And the USA, UK, China, Syria etc
 
i don't think you are a fan boy you were blaming the west for the actions of someone who is finally let the world see his true intentions

was finding it odd
I don't think understanding the intentions of leaders in a geopolitical context involves attributing blame. The West started handing out tickets to the EU / NATO following the collapse of the Soviet Union when Russia was weak. This will have rankled. Now they are strong they are asserting themselves.
 
I once read a short story by Robert Sheckley about some bloke who lands on a planet somewhere and almost immediately becomes supreme president, or some such title. He can make any decision he likes. What nobody had told him, however, was that as soon as his approval rating falls below 50% he is executed. I think that system should be tried in Russia. And the USA, UK, China, Syria etc
I saw a cartoon once where a well dressed bloke in a crown is told by men in white coats that he isn't actually a king, it was a psychiatric experiment which had now ended. I often wish that was true.
 
i wasn't defending the statement - its poor - i think it is true though that is justifiable to start by saying what is "our" role in this. We are part of this system whether we like it or not.
Perfectly possible to condemn the invasion whilst explaining the wider context and contributory agencies that have led to this appalling situation where many working class lives are being sacrificed. Although that wouldn’t suit the pro NATO brigade on here
 
Back
Top Bottom