Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

While accepting that most Russian citizens are spoon fed a load of propaganda bullshit, I think it's going to be interesting how the younger generation squares the government's claims of Ukraine aggression with the sudden and total disappearance of just about every major international firm from their shopping centres and online services.
 
thought the same about this


never mind eh, boil it down to some black and white argument where you can dismis the conflict to a sarcastic "we made him to do it :rolleyes:" and endlessly repeat. no nuance to talk about. boo at the bad man.

Russia has invaded Ukraine and is busy committing war crimes. Where is the room for nuance there? I think most of here already recognise that NATO could have done better in the past, even if the details of what that entails might differ from poster to poster.
 
While accepting that most Russian citizens are spoon fed a load of propaganda bullshit, I think it's going to be interesting how the younger generation squares the government's claims of Ukraine aggression with the sudden and total disappearance of just about every major international firm from their shopping centres and online services.

I think this point can't be emphasized enough. There is a younger generation - who are networked and through those networks have a developed and embedded worldview which is fundamentally incompatible with the actions and underpinning motivations and assumptions of Putin.
 
I think this point can't be emphasized enough. There is a younger generation - who are networked and through those networks have a developed and embedded worldview which is fundamentally incompatible with the actions and underpinning motivations and assumptions of Putin.

I can easily imagine this applying to the younger generation in the cities, but would this hold for the rural areas, which make up the bulk of the regime's support?
 
I think this point can't be emphasized enough. There is a younger generation - who are networked and through those networks have a developed and embedded worldview which is fundamentally incompatible with the actions and underpinning motivations and assumptions of Putin.

How much agency do these young people have? Everyone who could form the bedrock of an opposition is leaving if they have the means. Those brave souls who stay and protest are buying themselves a one way ticket to a stretch in Russia's worst penal colonies. I've seen telegram videos of young folks singing in the back of an autozak on their way to "processing" by the FSB. Heartbreaking.

800 people were arrested n Minsk in Belarus this weekend (effectively Belarus is now an autonomous western republic of the Russian Federation). People in the vicinity of the notorious Okrestina jail reported terrible screaming for most of the night.

The repression will be savage, cruel and relentless. Belarus has already had a taste of it since August 2020, and in some ways their opposition movement was more coherent in its demands than the various groupings in Russia.

The headroom and oxygen that a disciplined and viable opposition needs to grow support and presence will be denied ruthlessly.

Short of an outright Russian economic collapse and descent into Civil War in the coming months, it seems fanciful to think that a viable opposition could grow in the current circumstances.

I wish the admirable idealism and courage of Russia's young people would meet with a better reward but I cannot see it in the short-medium term.
 
Unfotunately you've just given us a good example of a situation where there aren't any rules of conflict, namely the genocidal forever war against Palestinians. Never mind white phosphorus, the rules say you can't occupy territory indefinitely, can't build settlements on occupied land etc etc.
Erm, yes, that was my point. There are rules, and sometimes those rules do get broken. Some countries/armies don't 'play by the rules' which is indicative that the civilian population, hospitals, schools, places of worship, ceasefires on humanitarian evacuation routes, journalists are considered fair game and so it's not a 'red herring' to address the issue of what type of weapons are being used and where, because in that kind of situation, the situation is worse - if that's imaginable.

Some people seem to be putting words in my mouth and projecting on me a kind of attitude of 'that's all right then' regarding the use of conventional weapons against civilians. No, of course it's not all right, ffs. I mean, I've been on urban for more than a decade now, and shouldn't have thought I'd have a reputation as a right-wing neolib who eschews morals and legalities when it comes to humanitarian causes and crises. So does what's being projected onto me track with my track records on these boards?

The type of weapon being used and where is highly relevant in that use of these non-legitimate weapons - NB: I didn't make the rules, didn't write the Geneva Convention - means that what's already a fucked up situation is inestimably worse for civilians, the risks they face to their lives are much higher than they would otherwise be.

My point is that it's not irrelevant, and it's not a matter of 'that's all right, then' if only conventional weapons are used, it's that if/when these other weapons are used it's indicative that all bets are off and things like war crimes and genocide are now afoot, where civilians aren't just 'collateral damage' but actively targeted, and the humanitarian crisis is going to be much worse and, no, by pointing that out that doesn't mean I think that's all right, in fact I think the opposite. Sheesh.
 
But you're singling out the Ukrainian government as if it were unique when you've admitted that it's not particularly any worse than any other government. Your original statement was just a piece of propaganda trying to share blame between Russia and Ukrain.
If there's one thing that grinds my gears more than most things, it's the lazy, arse-covering "they're all as bad as each other" bullshit that inevitably seems to go on, usually from people who think they're being smarter or cleverer than the rest of us.
 
Russia getting twitchy that Japan might take advantage of their military's weakened state to retake the disputed Kuril Islands?

Talk in Pravda of nuclear defence being used if they try it.
Training exercises on mock enemies
Not now, Japan. :rolleyes::facepalm:
 
its a weird way of phrasing it - I dont have "concern" for Russian imperialists "security concerns" - rather I recognise the Russian state as another fellow brutal actor on the imperial stage with a proven track record of aggression, and therefore believe foreign policy should act accordingly to minimise loss of life and security of all.

Political classes in the west are so used to thinking it's one rule for them and another for everyone else they act catastrophically across the world stage on the regular.

Now that it isn’t 1.30am and the effects of alcohol have worn off I can find the actual statement I was objecting to:

Stop the War opposes any war over Ukraine, and believes the crisis should be settled on a basis which recognises the right of the Ukrainian people to self-determination and addresses Russia’s security concerns.

But those two things are not equal,and could be contradictory. It may be practical realpolitik, but that wasn’t what STW was set up for. Russian security concerns should be no more important than US or Saudi ones.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ve no issue with strong criticism of NATO or demanding the UK quits it, just fuck russias ‘security concerns’
 
Now that it isn’t 1.30am and the effects of alcohol have worn off I can find the actual statement I was objecting to:

Stop the War opposes any war over Ukraine, and believes the crisis should be settled on a basis which recognises the right of the Ukrainian people to self-determination and addresses Russia’s security concerns.

But those two things are not equal,and could be contradictory. It may be practical realpolitik, but that wasn’t what STW was set up for. Russian security concerns should be no more important than US or Saudi ones.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ve no issue with strong criticism of NATO or demanding the UK quits it, just fuck russias ‘security concerns’
even for the swtc (are they still a coalition or are they just stop the war now?) that's really poor politics.

#57varieties
 
thought the same about this


never mind eh, boil it down to some black and white argument where you can dismis the conflict to a sarcastic "we made him to do it :rolleyes:" and endlessly repeat. no nuance to talk about. boo at the bad man.
Of course there's nuance and of course there's things to talk about but I just get a bit sick of the hand wringy approach some people have. 'ooh we must learn from this' or 'ooh if only we hadn't poked the Russian bear we'd all be fine now' and it's just tedious as fuck. It comes across as a willy waving 'look how more clued up I am about imperialism than you are.'

Your posts have been interesting to read for the record I just heard the phrase 'we should learn from this' once too often is all.

We, here, on this board or on the street can learn about how imperialist cunts behave all we like but I don't think it's going to matter much of a jot to said imperialist cunts. Yes it's a fatalistic position and yes it's a bit of goodies v baddies but fuck, I think it should be possible for people to be able to call someone who drops bombs on women in labour a vicious cunt without someone piping up with 'ooh but Russia's security.' We did it enough when Bush was bombing Iraq who, incidentally, used security as the argument for invasion so I think we can do the same on this occasion.
 
I can easily imagine this applying to the younger generation in the cities, but would this hold for the rural areas, which make up the bulk of the regime's support?


Just got off the phone with a very angry Russian woman, she's the same age as me, 49, she lives in Oxford and her mum lives in Chelyabinsk. She has seen her mum once in the last 2.5 years cos Covid, had a ticket to go last week on Aeroflot, that's now been refunded, she's looking at going to Ekaterinburg in April instead (she's aware that Russian Airlines will not be flying Boeing or Airbus from about a week's time and refuses to die on Russian made aircraft, can get to Ekaterinburg on Turkish Airlines). She's angry as fuck and says her mum is too; her mum usually comes to Europe once a year to have a holiday in the South of France with her, of course no visas are being issued and she just can't afford it as her Roubles are worth jack now. Chelyabinsk, whilst a decent size place is well removed from Moscow, her mum is late 70's, yet she is fully aware of what is going on and not cos her daughter's been telling her. So based on this exhaustive survey of one biased woman, older, more rural Russians may not as in the dark as we may think.
 
Of course there's nuance and of course there's things to talk about but I just get a bit sick of the hand wringy approach some people have. 'ooh we must learn from this' or 'ooh if only we hadn't poked the Russian bear we'd all be fine now' and it's just tedious as fuck. It comes across as a willy waving 'look how more clued up I am about imperialism than you are.'

Your posts have been interesting to read for the record I just heard the phrase 'we should learn from this' once too often is all.

We, here, on this board or on the street can learn about how imperialist cunts behave all we like but I don't think it's going to matter much of a jot to said imperialist cunts. Yes it's a fatalistic position and yes it's a bit of goodies v baddies but fuck, I think it should be possible for people to be able to call someone who drops bombs on women in labour a vicious cunt without someone piping up with 'ooh but Russia's security.' We did it enough when Bush was bombing Iraq who, incidentally, used security as the argument for invasion so I think we can do the same on this occasion.
tbh we ought to learn from this, and one lesson i've already taken is how this sort of thing can get started with very little backstory. very few of us know or knew much about what has been going on in those parts since 2014. perhaps we could take this lesson and rather than try and play catch-up in future to start informing ourselves on china (for example) now. and india. pakistan. brazil. and so on.

i hope that the war in ukraine is over soon. it may be. it may drag on for months, or even years. but please - PLEASE! - let it be a period in which we don't rely on tweets and op eds as a substitute for informed debate, let it be a period in which we educate ourselves not only on the area but also on the reality of modern warfare. some of us are more advanced than others on these learning curves: but let's not be found wanting again.
 
Just got off the phone with a very angry Russian woman, she's the same age as me, 49, she lives in Oxford and her mum lives in Chelyabinsk. She has seen her mum once in the last 2.5 years cos Covid, had a ticket to go last week on Aeroflot, that's now been refunded, she's looking at going to Ekaterinburg in April instead (she's aware that Russian Airlines will not be flying Boeing or Airbus from about a week's time and refuses to die on Russian made aircraft, can get to Ekaterinburg on Turkish Airlines). She's angry as fuck and says her mum is too; her mum usually comes to Europe once a year to have a holiday in the South of France with her, of course no visas are being issued and she just can't afford it as her Roubles are worth jack now. Chelyabinsk, whilst a decent size place is well removed from Moscow, her mum is late 70's, yet she is fully aware of what is going on and not cos her daughter's been telling her. So based on this exhaustive survey of one biased woman, older, more rural Russians may not as in the dark as we may think.

It seems to me that the lack of propaganda preparation might turn out to be really inconvenient for the Russian government, who have suddenly thrust this "special military operation" upon the people. No idea exactly how big of a problem this might be, but it does seem to be another miscalculation.
 
iirc, didn't they infamously invade another country and instead of suffering losses they came back with a headcount of +1 because they'd made a friend, or something like that?

Yes! :D

Did Liechtenstein really gain a soldier in a war?

The last time Liechtenstein saw military action was in 1866, during the Austro-Prussian War, when they sent 80 troops to guard the Tyrolean border. They returned home with 81 men, having suffered no casualties and gained a new recruit en route.

LINK
 
How much agency do these young people have? Everyone who could form the bedrock of an opposition is leaving if they have the means. Those brave souls who stay and protest are buying themselves a one way ticket to a stretch in Russia's worst penal colonies. I've seen telegram videos of young folks singing in the back of an autozak on their way to "processing" by the FSB. Heartbreaking.

800 people were arrested n Minsk in Belarus this weekend (effectively Belarus is now an autonomous western republic of the Russian Federation). People in the vicinity of the notorious Okrestina jail reported terrible screaming for most of the night.

The repression will be savage, cruel and relentless. Belarus has already had a taste of it since August 2020, and in some ways their opposition movement was more coherent in its demands than the various groupings in Russia.

The headroom and oxygen that a disciplined and viable opposition needs to grow support and presence will be denied ruthlessly.

Short of an outright Russian economic collapse and descent into Civil War in the coming months, it seems fanciful to think that a viable opposition could grow in the current circumstances.

I wish the admirable idealism and courage of Russia's young people would meet with a better reward but I cannot see it in the short-medium term.

I think this is a critical point - that knowing about shit going south doesn't actually provide a solution to it - it requires knowledge of it, and then levers of power to do anything about it.

It's my pet hobby-horse at the moment, but during Stalin's purges in the 1930's the NKVD and GRU's strength of overseas officers and agents were not far off destroyed by the NKVD - the Soviet intelligence group in China had perhaps half of its members murdered. Barely any Soviet Officer or agent involved in the recruitment of British spies in the 1930's survived - but here's the thing: they all knew what was happening, they all knew that Moscow had gone mad, and that a recall to the Centre was a death sentence, but it didn't stop just because they knew.
 
all the people who have left Russia, which is a lot, will be in touch with people at home as well. The extreme repression measures they brought in last week are there for a reason, to try to crush any public expression of what people know but are not allowed to say.
As in previous times, it doesn't really matter what people know to be true as long as you can effectively terrify them into silence.

eta what kebabking said
 
Now that it isn’t 1.30am and the effects of alcohol have worn off I can find the actual statement I was objecting to:

Stop the War opposes any war over Ukraine, and believes the crisis should be settled on a basis which recognises the right of the Ukrainian people to self-determination and addresses Russia’s security concerns.

But those two things are not equal,and could be contradictory. It may be practical realpolitik, but that wasn’t what STW was set up for. Russian security concerns should be no more important than US or Saudi ones.

Don’t get me wrong, I’ve no issue with strong criticism of NATO or demanding the UK quits it, just fuck russias ‘security concerns’
Here here
Of course there's nuance and of course there's things to talk about but I just get a bit sick of the hand wringy approach some people have. 'ooh we must learn from this' or 'ooh if only we hadn't poked the Russian bear we'd all be fine now' and it's just tedious as fuck. It comes across as a willy waving 'look how more clued up I am about imperialism than you are.'

Your posts have been interesting to read for the record I just heard the phrase 'we should learn from this' once too often is all.

We, here, on this board or on the street can learn about how imperialist cunts behave all we like but I don't think it's going to matter much of a jot to said imperialist cunts. Yes it's a fatalistic position and yes it's a bit of goodies v baddies but fuck, I think it should be possible for people to be able to call someone who drops bombs on women in labour a vicious cunt without someone piping up with 'ooh but Russia's security.' We did it enough when Bush was bombing Iraq who, incidentally, used security as the argument for invasion so I think we can do the same on this occasion.
The learn from this content was posted directly at a poster who annoyed me by doing that "you made me do it" simplified comment one time too many. There's no point of discussing anything if people are prepared to reduce it that far. It's the kind of simplification that breeds conflict.
 
It seems to me that the lack of propaganda preparation might turn out to be really inconvenient for the Russian government, who have suddenly thrust this "special military operation" upon the people. No idea exactly how big of a problem this might be, but it does seem to be another miscalculation.
between that and the absence of an air campaign to diminish and destroy ukrainian defences, command and control facilities, power stations etc - basically the same targets the americans hit in 2003 - the russians have shot themselves in the foot: and while every day brings the ukrainians new friends and supplies it loses the russians treasure and equipment and the inititative while increasing opposition to the war, and reasons for opposition to the war. time is on the ukrainian side.
 
I think this is a critical point - that knowing about shit going south doesn't actually provide a solution to it - it requires knowledge of it, and then levers of power to do anything about it.

It's my pet hobby-horse at the moment, but during Stalin's purges in the 1930's the NKVD and GRU's strength of overseas officers and agents were not far off destroyed by the NKVD - the Soviet intelligence group in China had perhaps half of its members murdered. Barely any Soviet Officer or agent involved in the recruitment of British spies in the 1930's survived - but here's the thing: they all knew what was happening, they all knew that Moscow had gone mad, and that a recall to the Centre was a death sentence, but it didn't stop just because they knew.
yeh (the terror of the 30s worthy of a thread of its own) - the looniest thing was it was repression/execution by quota, be it librarians or the nkvd. utter lunacy. slowly rereading the great terror: a reassessment by robert conquest and it's mind-numbing with horror not boredom the story he tells.
 
Not as tiny as you might think honestly. It's more and more common for working and lower middle class Russians to go abroad to places like Turkey etc on a regular basis. And lots of Russians have gone to work abroad.
Fair enough, still be surprised if there's not a big chunk of people who've never been and would be sufficient to provide some sort of basis for the regime.
ETA Found some figures on a quick search that in 2014 it was 76 percent not been outside former Soviet Union, so even given increasing ease of travel expect that's still well over half: Why do Russians have 2 passports?
 
Fair enough, still be surprised if there's not a big chunk of people who've never been and would be sufficient to provide some sort of basis for the regime.
Sure. But part of putins popularity is that he's enabled more and more people to do stuff like go on cheap holidays overseas tho that used to be reserved for the very rich. You'd be surprised at what a big cross section of Russian society have done stuff like that. And loads of Russians are working abroad in stuff like the construction industry and sending money home.
 
Back
Top Bottom