Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine and the Russian invasion, 2022-24

Not entirely convinced about that tbh, Russia's just spent the last three years rebuilding its economy around war production and now has a large veteran army as opposed to a large inept one. The temptation could easily be there to start another war to stave off economic problems.
The Russian war economy is fine at making guns and bombs and rockets. And even the simpler drones. But they suck at making their own electronics. They have fewer radars, fewer AA systems, fewer helicopters and basically less of everything over a certain tech level now because they can't scale up production of them. And because they can't scale up, they're not getting economies of scale out of them either so what they can turn out, like the infamous T-14, is expensive. There's also a wavering question about the effectiveness of what they do have. A few S-400 batteries were recently destroyed by HIMARS - a threat they're specifically designed to counter. Though I personally lean towards them not being able to train people properly rather than the kit being crap. Because the Ukrainians use a lot of ex-Soviet stuff and seem to have pretty good results out of it. And if that is the case, then that's the level of "veteran" you're dealing with.
 
Recent survey comparing US and Euro views re Russian invasion. Usual issues re surveys apply ie ask the right question to get the right answer/sample size and also the three countries in Europe that are polled are Western not those next to Russia.

View attachment 427870
View attachment 427871View attachment 427871
I wonder what the stats would be like without Germany, which is pacifist for obvious reasons. There is a clear majority in favour in this country.

 
I wonder what the stats would be like without Germany, which is pacifist for obvious reasons. There is a clear majority in favour in this country.


Is this the same pacifist Germany who are Europe's largest supply of weapons and equipment to Ukraine or another Germany?
 
Happy Groundhog Day



if Kyiv started withdrawing troops from the four regions annexed by Moscow in 2022
- regions not fully occupied by Russia's troops, he seriously expects Kyiv to hand over land that has not been taken? That's his offer? Deluded cunt.
 
NATO membership aside, even the most ardent Just Make A Deal type must see the problem with an offer of "give up your defensive positions for negotiations, where I'll tell you you have to disarm and trust me that we won't try this again when you have no weapons."
 
According to that AP report, Putin also claimed there was a big misunderstanding about how his peaceful troops peacefully invaded Ukraine and peacefully made their way toward Kyiv in the interests of peace

The Kremlin has repeatedly aired its readiness for peace talks with Kyiv and blamed the West for undermining its efforts to end the conflict. Putin went further Friday and claimed his troops never intended to storm Ukraine’s capital, Kyiv, even though they approached the city. “In essence, it was nothing other than an operation to force the Ukrainian regime to peace. The troops were there to push the Ukrainian side to negotiate, to try and find an acceptable solution,” he said.

Moscow withdrew from Kyiv in March 2022 and described it a goodwill gesture as peace talks between the two began, but the pullback took place amid fierce Ukrainian resistance that significantly slowed down Russia’s battlefield advances.
 
Which brings us neatly to the reality of your position, which is not "pro peace" but pro a temporary cease-fire followed by occupation, the destruction of what limited democracy Ukraine has and the imposition of a Russian strongman in a straightforward expansion of Russian imperialism. Followed, no doubt, by the same crackdowns against the socialist left and progressive rights that we've seen in Russia and Belarus.

You might not agree with the possibility of successful resistance but I wonder, can you bend your brain around others' lack of enthusiasm for endorsing that outcome?
 
Which brings us neatly to the reality of your position, which is not "pro peace" but pro a temporary cease-fire followed by occupation, the destruction of what limited democracy Ukraine has and the imposition of a Russian strongman in a straightforward expansion of Russian imperialism. Followed, no doubt, by the same crackdowns against the socialist left and progressive rights that we've seen in Russia and Belarus.

You might not agree with the possibility of successful resistance but I wonder, can you bend your brain around others' lack of enthusiasm for endorsing that outcome?
Can you focus on the conflict instead of baiting people who don’t agree with you?
 
Which brings us neatly to the reality of your position, which is not "pro peace" but pro a temporary cease-fire followed by occupation, the destruction of what limited democracy Ukraine has and the imposition of a Russian strongman in a straightforward expansion of Russian imperialism. Followed, no doubt, by the same crackdowns against the socialist left and progressive rights that we've seen in Russia and Belarus.

You might not agree with the possibility of successful resistance but I wonder, can you bend your brain around others' lack of enthusiasm for endorsing that outcome?
i don't give a shit if you are enthusiastic or not.
 
Back
Top Bottom