platinumsage
HaveMyPassword123
I think the depth and cold and the heavy clothing and wellies is enough for her to drown, without invoking an unlikely head injury in rock-strewn shallows.
The one in that field doesn't appear to be
I've seen a photo of them and I have a hard time imagining how she could hit her head on them.
Case closed.I think the depth and cold and the heavy clothing and wellies is enough for her to drown, without invoking an unlikely head injury in rock-strewn shallows.
What no hard soil rocks, tree routes any where near where she may have fallen in. And you can tell all that from a photo? impressive.
We don't actually know that she went into the water though. I'd hazard a guess from spending a lot of time waist deep in similar rivers that the 'Deep hole' where she was last seen is max 5/6ft when the river height is low.Sure but I was responding to the claim "it was only 3ft" and the implication that she should not therefore have been able to drown easily despite heavy clothing. The river where she went in (and we don't know where in those fields that was) was probably a lot deeper than that in places, and shallower in other places too. We simply don't know in what depth of water she might have drowned, even though we do know (from the measurement point a few hundred yards away) that the river wasn't in flood mode.
It would give you an indication of flow which is a lot more likely to affect her ability to get out than depth. Cold water shock would have a big effect on you but if you could stand up in a slow moving river you have a good chance of getting out. A fast moving river 3 feet deep can easily overpower the strongest of people.That would be meaningless because it's the depth where she potentially fell in that would determine whether she ought to have been able to not drown despite her clothing. The average depth or deepest place elsewhere wouldn't have any implications for what might have happened to her.
Bang it on what, the grass?
We don't actually know that she went into the water though.
The Jury's still out for me mate. I'm just explaining rivers to none fisher-folk.Ta-Da!
What's that caller? It's a poor signal on the line.It's been tried before
There's about 16 different posters between his last 3 posts mate. Live by the sword...Are you replying to someone I can't see in your last 3 posts xenon ?
Are you replying to someone I can't see in your last 3 posts xenon ?
The Jury's still out for me mate. I'm just explaining rivers to none fisher-folk.
Fisher-folk-splaining if you please. This has been agreed by the majority of posters in a poll held by cesare earlier in the thread.Fishplaining
It looks like teuchter's nicked your loginFisher-folk-splaining if you please. This has been agreed by the majority of posters in a poll held by cesare earlier in the thread.
There's a little bit of curmudgeon in all of us.It looks like teuchter's nicked your login
Yeah we came close tbh. We lost it with this lot, they were so flippin rude, demanding and entitled. My friend had to deal with sobbing strangers videoing themselves at her gate, begging to be let in, this was pre TikTok, must be even worse now. They’re looking for another missing person, next to my neighbour's place, divers were there yesterday, they didn’t find him, it never ends.The locals should be allowed to pitch anyone who shouldn't be there into the river.
There are at least three CCTV blind spots in the area where Nicola was last seen, meaning it is possible that the mum could have left the area. One is a path not covered by security cameras and leads to Garstang Road, which runs right through the village .... Another possible blindspot is a riverside path leading from the Wyreside Farm Caravan Park through to the A586 ... A camera at a house is understood to have not been working at the time, but it still doesn't cover the exit ... Friends of Nicola say that the CCTV meant to cover one of the two exits from the river near the mobile home site Rowanwater, is not working. Police officers searching for Nicola may be tracking a "tatty-looking" red van which a witness said was parked close to the spot she disappeared.
At least 3 CCTV blindspots now, and police "may be" looking for a red van seen close to where she went missing.
The red van is one of the thousands of pieces of crap that people felt compelled to phone in and which the police are sifting through. The difference being the phoner babbled to the tabloids about it.
For some reason I always remember this story (possibly because Sarah was only a bit older than Middle Q was at the time)At least 3 CCTV blindspots now, and police "may be" looking for a red van seen close to where she went missing.
Well there's a turn-up for the books. I'm truly surprised nobody suggested any of that as a possibility ...
You mean there may be a lot of info the cops may be sitting on as it makes them look like numptiesWhich, if true, reinforces the point that there’s a lot of information that the police haven’t released.
I really don’t get why some here are so keen to invoke fairies, wormholes, and aliens, rather than simply admitting that there’s an increasing possibility that she didn’t go into the river at all.
I saw someone mentioning the red van days ago on twitter, the media are just picking it up now as they're running out things to talk about to keep this circus going.The 'tatty' red van might be a real clue but of course the person who claims they saw it is only now telling Plod about it two weeks after the event which at the time they probably paid very little attention to. I'm confident that if I saw a van parked down a country lane it would stay in my memory only until I had gone round the corner and couldn't see it.