Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
I'd say the the hippie opposition to the Vietnam war, which went to the extremes of the Weather Underground and the bombing campaign, is pretty hard to characterize as a right wing/reactionary ideology.
No but i've probably read thousands of reviews of books that are either cultural histories of or autobiographies of the period and the general conclusions they draw from them - plus plenty of books that synthesis the research those thousands of books etc were based on or carried out. How about you?Have you read thousands of autobiographies of ex-hippies?
Are you just going to count all left-wing things from the 60s and 70s as hippy then? Not a very fruitful way to proceed really - esp as in this particular case a good part of the motivation for the Weather Underground was disgust and anger at the feebleness and passivity of 'Hippie opposition'.I'd say the the hippie opposition to the Vietnam war, which went to the extremes of the Weather Underground and the bombing campaign, is pretty hard to characterize as a right wing/reactionary ideology.
No but i've probably read thousands of reviews of books that are either cultural histories of or autobiographies of the period and the general conclusions they draw from them - plus plenty of books that synthesis the research those thousands of books etc were based on or carried out. How about you?
Are you just going to count all left-wing things from the 60s and 70s as hippy then? Not a very fruitful way to proceed really - esp as in this particular case a good part of the motivation for the Weather Underground was disgust and anger at the feebleness and passivity of 'Hippie opposition'.
Unless you're going to find and identify every single manifestation of hippydom ever and conclusively demonstrate that it was unambiguously left-wing.
That included an element that strongly rejected hippydom.The Weather Underground were a species or subset of 'hippies', in the same way that Stalinists and Trotskyites are subsets of communists.
That included an element that strongly rejected hippydom..
Along with other classic elements of hippydom - the group was split by those who were into the sex and drugs thing and those who wanted nothing to so with it for example, criticising it and the wider ideas as examples of bourgeois individualism leading to hedonism and rejection of class struggle.Which brings up yet another ambiguity in the example - hippies generally weren't know for class struggle analysis yet this group based their whole philosophy around a (mis)understanding of it and its central significance.No; it rejected pacifism.
And on thinking further that example is even more problematical if taken as an example of left-leaning hippies as the group contained very strong right-wing authoritarian themes of leadership and elitism that went unrecognised by the participants at the time but which many came to see very clearly in later years. So even this seemingly simple example is shot through with the sort of ambiguities that others have mentioned generally as regards hippies.
J For the hippies, the natural order of things included items such as stereo record players, electric guitars, motor vehicles for adventuring around the country, cheap bulk wholegrains and other products of an oil-intensive industrial way of life. The hippie platform, so to speak, with all its mystical incunabula, rested on the platform of 'normal' American life, and would have been impossible without it. .
These weren't just leftover 'elements' - they were the bedrock of a 'bombing campaign' and political activity over a decade plus, these weren't residues, they were actively fostered qualities, the ones that allowed them to carry out their activities.Elements of sexism, elitism etc could be found within 'hippies', because of their prevalence in the culture at large in those days. But there were aspects of 'hippie culture' that recognized the existence of those failings, and actively worked at trying to overcome them.
You aren't suggesting that sexism, elitism etc are always absent from left-wing organizations of any kind?
These weren't just leftover 'elements' - they were the bedrock of a 'bombing campaign' and political activity over a decade plus, these weren't residues, they were actively fostered qualities, the ones that allowed them to carry out their activities.
What a ridiculous suggestion - not one that follows from anything i've written either. If anything i've been arguing the opposite.
I'll have to run Kunstler's ideas past my friends who dropped out of 'straight' life in the late seventies and moved to communes in the Interior of British Columbia, where they lived with few of the amenities of the prevailing culture, and remained at it long enough to have and raise children to adulthood in that milieu.
Yes, why not do that?
I don't really need to, because their existence helps put the lie to Kunstler's hypothesis.
Ultimately maintained by the wider society they 'rejected.'
Why not read the thread title?I think it needs clarifying which hippies one are referring to in this thread. Is it US hippies, UK hippies or hippies elsewhere? AFAIK in my homeland the hippie movement was quickly absorbed within far left maoist-leninist movements, so that would hardly support the thesis that the dominant hippie ideology was that of the far right. Incidentally, a google search for "hippies and the far right" has this thread as it's no 1 result
this is a standard right wing viewI laugh in the face of people who call me right wing, becasue I think we could exist without a goverment telling us what to do at every turn. I guess some people like to be told what to do, it saves them from having to think.
this is a standard right wing view
It was middle class in the US too.I think that we could say that individualism and progression through some kind of self-awareness/retreat into self is possibly a unifying hippy ideal. Although I am not sure how far you could go with that. It's certainly a rejection of paternalist influences and previous beliefs or strictures. I can see why conventional leftists would be affronted with the rejection of marxist doctrine.
Hippism as middle class is perhaps more of a UK thing than a US one. In the US it was a rejection of the 1950s suburban post-war culture and the authority structures around that. Here in the UK it was more just a fringe of middle class drug users talking balls.
AFAIK in my homeland the hippie movement was quickly absorbed within far left maoist-leninist movements.
I think you'd struggle to provide conclusive evidence of that - not least because you'd have to define what middle class was in relation to 1960s America.It was middle class in the US too.
No, not really.I suppose to the extent that such labels serve any purpose, anarchy/anarchism could be better described as 'right wing' than 'left wing'.