Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Collective - new left wing party?

This, the Labour Party won (and to be clear, as a wanky reformist I’m really glad they did) but they did it with a very effective and very cynical campaign to make maximum use of the damage Reform did to the Tories. This is entirely down to the bizarre electoral system we have.
That's one reading of it, I suppose. Another reading is that the Labour campaign appealed to nobody and they slipped through with barely one third of the vote share because Reform split the Tory vote.

Labour didn't win the election, the Tories lost it. Labour stumbled into a huge majority on the back of an awful campaign that inspired nobody. They could hardly fail to win given the circumstances.
 
That's one reading of it, I suppose. Another reading is that the Labour campaign appealed to nobody and they slipped through with barely one third of the vote share because Reform split the Tory vote.

Labour didn't win the election, the Tories lost it. Labour stumbled into a huge majority on the back of an awful campaign that inspired nobody. They could hardly fail to win given the circumstances.


It inspired a very narrow band of right leaning people in some key marginals whilst pissing off probably more people, but in labour safe seats. It was one of the most cynical British elections there has been. But also one of the most successful- though I fear that will only be temporary.

Yes the Tories lost, because of the car crash they had become and because of Reform. But the Labour campaign maximised the benefits to them of this. I hated it. Not least because as part of the collateral damage I got a fucking Reform MP.
 
If Corbyn's Labour had won power, they might actually have done some good in office. This bunch of grasping cunts have fallen into power with no intention of doing any good at all.

What is the point in a Labour victory if they will do nothing when in power? The point isn't power. The point is meaningful change, of which there will be precisely none with the current extreme r/w govt. One extreme r/w govt replaces another. Whoopdeedoo.

 
Vote share matters, as does winning. Labour won this election by focusing on quite a small group of older swing voters in certain marginal areas, in the context of the right wing vote having split. If my step Mum and her friends are indicative of those swing voters in marginals they're already detested.
"Labour won this election by focusing on quite a small group of older swing voters in certain marginal areas".
Is there any evidence for this claim?
 
They may have been shouting Ronstadt , after the American singer song writer , just to make American Sparts feel at home.
I once deliberately mispronounced her name as Kronstadt when I was doing A Levels at a college a few years before, when I was having a rant about the poor taste in music of some people.
 
I haven't seen any evidence that Labour specifically targeted, successfully or not, older swing voters in marginals. It was commented on at length though, that they were targeting those Brexit voters in red wall constituencies that switched in the 2019 election, playing up issues like patriotism, immigration, defence spending, keeping quiet on 'woke' issues. I presume a large proportion of their target would be elderly.

Some interesting results appeared recently
Andy Beckett

The first striking detail is how few extra red-wall voters Labour actually attracted at the 2024 election. According to Focaldata, the party’s vote share there only increased from 38% to 41%. Far more voters switched from the Conservatives to Reform, and this split on the right was mainly responsible for Labour capturing so many seats. Encouraging and exploiting such a split was part of Labour’s strategy: a forthcoming book on the election by Tim Ross and Rachel Wearmouth says the party deliberately did not campaign much against Reform. But with Reform now second behind Labour in 89 seats, in the red wall and beyond, and Reform’s favourite issue, immigration, often dominating politics since the election, usually to the government’s discomfort, the wisdom of Labour’s decision not to take on the party during the election is increasingly open to question.

So is how much Labour’s red-wall gains really contributed to its election win. According to Focaldata, fewer than a seventh of the seats the party captured were in the red wall. This suggests Labour could have won comfortably without them.
 
A little bit of anarchism right there. :thumbs:

A little bit of Monica in my life
A little bit of Erica by my side
A little bit of Rita's all I need
A little bit of Tina's what I see
A little bit of Sandra in the sun
A little bit of Mary all night long
A little bit of Jessica, love I swear
A little bit of anarchism right there..
 
Except without the most important bit: winning power.

Only losers talk vote share, winners govern.

Sadly this thread demonstrates why this new venture is doomed to fail, the left is chronically unable to face reality and organise to win. Navel gazing about vote share in this voting system is a distraction. The game is winnable seats, and Downing St.

Oh, you do like Starmer. I thought it was a joke.
 
A little bit of Monica in my life
A little bit of Erica by my side
A little bit of Rita's all I need
A little bit of Tina's what I see
A little bit of Sandra in the sun
A little bit of Mary all night long
A little bit of Jessica, love I swear
A little bit of anarchism right there..
IMG_4898.jpeg
 
Back
Top Bottom