articul8
Dishonest sociopath
where did I?You suggested that the worth the worth of something was to be judged by how it benefits your party in the outcome.
where did I?You suggested that the worth the worth of something was to be judged by how it benefits your party in the outcome.
Let's make sure there are no other left groups to take up the slack we all vote and join labour. Can you see the problem?The death of PASOK is a good thing. I agree with this. But I don't think the death of Labour *in the absence of the conditions for building a left alternative* would be equally beneficial. It's not a direct analogy.
Not my position. Let 1000 flowers bloom I say.Let's make sure there are no other left groups to take up the slack we all vote and join labour. Can you see the problem?
What are these never reachable:
The point is whether Labour can be stopped from taking the same trajectory as PASOK, and where former PASOK voters go - to SYRIZA or to New Democracy (or even Golden Dawn).
Fitting. But you don't know why.Not my position. Let 1000 flowers bloom I say.
Who would that benefit? UKIP? BNP? EDL? certainly not the left as it stands.
What has stopped the Brit left from creating a Syriza? Voting system (imagine wanting to change that )...
lack of pluralism (pluralist wankers!), etc.etc. Mind you, I assume you think Syriza are middle class left arseholes too? You're waiting for a right-wing takeover to say "I told you so".
right...thanks for this (mildly homophobic) wisdom...
"up each others' arses" is mildly homophobic.
no fiefdoms with PR/STV
We need a politics where politicians look like the constituents they represent. So we should not rest until 50 per cent of our MPs are women, ethnic minorities are properly represented and we deal with one of the most glaring omissions in political representation: the skewing of our politics away from working class representation.
It's not hard to accept. It's very easy to accept. As i said yesterday, knock yourself out. Why is this so hard to accept? I notice that it's only the poster that you disagree with that gets this one-eyed shite.What is so hard to accept about the fact I'm in interested, and I wanna talk about it? If you're not, then fair enough, but why should that stop me from being able to talk about it?
It's like trying to watch a film, and someone coming into the room and saying "Why are you watching this, it's shit, no-one cares about this" before going on to ruin the film by sitting through it and pointing out all the bits they don't like about it.
It is shit. There must be something else on. Anyone fancy a pint?What is so hard to accept about the fact I'm in interested, and I wanna talk about it? If you're not, then fair enough, but why should that stop me from being able to talk about it?
It's like trying to watch a film, and someone coming into the room and saying "Why are you watching this, it's shit, no-one cares about this" before going on to ruin the film by sitting through it and pointing out all the bits they don't like about it.
It's not hard to accept. It's very easy to accept. As i said yesterday, knock yourself out. Why is this so hard to accept? I notice that it's only the poster that you disagree with that gets this one-eyed shite.
What thread? There is no thread. I'm sure that your insights could make one appear though right? Maybe by posting something that people then respond to? Oh yeah. Like already happened with fuck all interest.
No, get to fuck - if want to respond to anything you and he say on this topic and the wider issues it covers then i will. It would help if you actually started saying something though.Even if it just boils down to me and Articul8 discussing it, could you please just leave us to it without this constantly whining about how you don't care about it? You've made your point quite extensively by now.
If you've got nothing to say on the topic itself then I'm just not gonna respond because I don't want to get drawn into a 50-page pissing contest with you butchers, sorry.
This is an awful thread.
Anyway Miliband's made a "brave" speech at the national policy forum birmingham which contains some rhetoric that I reckon could be interpreted as a nod towards the left of the party:
http://labourlist.org/2012/06/today-miliband-will-make-a-brave-speech-but-is-it-brave-enough/
Interesting looking through the comments on this one too. This row between Progress and GMB has creeped into the mainstream news a little bit. Can milibands comments be seen as a sly wink to the left, or what? Probably not, this speech was probably written weeks ago, but it may be interpreted that way.