Mr.Bishie
pickled egg
I’d wager Ian Symes, the man who was killed, was a lot taller.Going by the scale on this diagram that man is 3'4" tall.
I’d wager Ian Symes, the man who was killed, was a lot taller.Going by the scale on this diagram that man is 3'4" tall.
Fucksake 8Ball. What are you aiming for here? For me to say “Yep, you’re right, I’m wrong. In light of your experience I now re-evaluate my own and I’ve changed my mind”
I was talking of the last time this happened and then no one was bitten by a dog ever after.
Yeah that’s what they say about gun laws in America. e.g. New York state bans most gun ownership, yet criminals still carry guns and kill people with them, therefore the gun laws shouldn’t have been passed.
What’s your solution to the ownership of dogs which frequently kill and maim people and which can only easily be stopped by certain weapons? Do you think we should tighten up and improve the laws on dangerous dogs, or just say “whoa dude, media panic alert, let’s not ban anything”?
I can guarantee my dog would never attack anyone but then he’s a ridiculously soppy spaniel. I wouldn’t be so confident if I owned one of the more ‘dangerous’ breeds.
I could pretty much guarantee that the white dickhead would never attack anyone but he’s still kept firmly attached to me in public if there are people around. It only takes one mistake to change someone’s life.
Ah I knew someone was gonna make the argument about you can't identify the breeds. How come people buy them on the basis it's a particular breed then. I know it looks like a Yorkie but seriously mate it is a mini Japanese Toza.
That's not what you said though. Your solution is to round up and destroy all dogs belonging to a certain breed, which is a sledgehammer/nut affair. I agree some dogs should have a more stringent vetting process before ownership and possibly reduction of numbers imported. I didn't say "do nothing" at all. So you've not only claimed something different to what you did originally, you've attributed to me something I didn't sayWhat’s your solution to the ownership of dogs which frequently kill and maim people and which can only easily be stopped by certain weapons? Do you think we should tighten up and improve the laws on dangerous dogs, or just say “whoa dude, media panic alert, let’s not ban anything”?
That's not what you said though. Your solution is to round up and destroy all dogs belonging to a certain breed, which is a sledgehammer/nut affair. I agree some dogs should have a more stringent vetting process before ownership and possibly reduction of numbers imported. I didn't say "do nothing" at all. So you've not only claimed something different to what you did originally, you've attributed to me something I didn't say
Only one husky has killed a child in the UK so far this year.
I thought they do DNA tests on the dogs now, to see if they are a banned breed?For those of restricted memory, one of the issues with the bans on dog breeds is that there is no simple way of determining a dog’s breed.
This issue then gets exacerbated by Government, who start writing laws of the “chiefly characterised by a series of repetitive beats” variety.
The law is based entirely on what a dog looks like.
This has led to mongrels of unrelated heritage being destroyed, among other innocent dogs.
Also, the dangerous dogs act completely failed in reducing the number of injuries from dog attacks.
Extending a failed law doesn’t look like the way to go to me.
Killer has proper savaged that teddy bear!This is Max. Or Killer as he’s more commonly known
I know. I take back everything I said about him being a gentle soul!!Killer has proper savaged that teddy bear!
Just did some Googleing.
Looks like cows kill more than dogs.
Well need bull dogs to protect us from cattle
I thought they do DNA tests on the dogs now, to see if they are a banned breed?
Solution. Like there’s a solution that I or anyone else here is going to come up with. The answer is I dunno. Ask an expert.Yeah that’s what they say about gun laws in America. e.g. New York state bans most gun ownership, yet criminals still carry guns and kill people with them, therefore the gun laws shouldn’t have been passed.
What’s your solution to the ownership of dogs which frequently kill and maim people and which can only easily be stopped by certain weapons? Do you think we should tighten up and improve the laws on dangerous dogs, or just say “whoa dude, media panic alert, let’s not ban anything”?
Just wait til you hear how many cows get killed by humans. Ban humans!Just did some Googleing.
Looks like cows kill more than dogs.
Well need bull dogs to protect us from cattle
Yes they do.I thought they do DNA tests on the dogs now, to see if they are a banned breed?
Solution. Like there’s a solution that I or anyone else here is going to come up with. The answer is I dunno. Ask an expert.
I didn’t come here to be scrutinised, Mr Paxman. It’s Saturday evening.If you don’t know what the solution is and would rather defer to experts, why did you twice say that banning dogs is a bad idea?
Yes they do.