kebabking
Not a Girly Swot, but I like them....
Effects at range. Sounds like artillery to me...the archers at Crecy were not artillery, at all
Effects at range. Sounds like artillery to me...the archers at Crecy were not artillery, at all
the archers at Crecy were not artillery, at all
I liked Sugar Sugar but haven't heard any of their other stuff.I thought the Archers were in Ambridge.
For sure.the americans have done, time and again, 1, probably 2, certainly 3 and haven't yet had the opportunity for four and five. so let's not hold this up as the russians are uniquely vicious or nasty, people our government cuddles up to would do and have done much the same
Yea these weapon dumps are a primary stated target and because UKR has the air defense of a tortoise lying on its back in the sun they are hiding them in places where civilians might be hit.
Yea these weapon dumps are a primary stated target and because UKR has the air defense of a tortoise lying on its back in the sun they are hiding them in places where civilians might be hit.
Longbow was closer to artillery than crossbow was/isthe archers at Crecy were not artillery, at all
Jesus christ
The boy stood on the burning deck,Cannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon in front of them
Volley'd and thunder'd;
Storm'd at with shot and shell,
Boldly they rode and well,
Into the jaws of Death,
Into the mouth of hell
Rode the six hundred.
Think this Crimea is more cest la guere mais c"est pas magnifiqueCannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon in front of them
Volley'd and thunder'd;
Storm'd at with shot and shell,
Boldly they rode and well,
Into the jaws of Death,
Into the mouth of hell
Rode the six hundred.
TBF, longbows were generally used at a much closer range than people tend to assume. At maximum range, a longbow struggles to even penetrate a linen gambeson and there is no point in wasting shafts and - more importantly - the stamina of your archers at such a range. Most shots would be fired at sub-100m ranges. The longbow does have a greater range than the crossbow, but most of that range is useless against a target with even nominal (eg: cloth) armour.Longbow was closer to artillery than crossbow was/is
Effects at range. Sounds like artillery to me...
Blowpipes, peashooters...not really, unless rifles, javelins, slings and muskets are artillery
It says here: artillery | Etymology, origin and meaning of artillery by etymonlineOriginally any engine for discharging missiles (catapults, slings, bows, etc.); modern restriction to "ordnance, large guns" is from 16c. Technically, "all firearms discharged from carriages," as opposed to small arms, discharged by hand.
TBH, I think these hairsplitting distinctions are rather irrelevant to the points kebabking made in his excellent post.the archers at Crecy were not artillery, at all
Irrelevant hairsplitting distinctions on urban?TBH, I think these hairsplitting distinctions are rather irrelevant to the points kebabking made in his excellent post.
Look upon our pedants ye mighty and despairTBH, I think these hairsplitting distinctions are rather irrelevant to the points kebabking made in his excellent post.
Think you missed a comma.Irrelevant hairsplitting distinctions on urban?
What do you expect the Russians to do after that?it will probably work in (eventually) massively degrading the Ru Armys main combat arm.
Some hairsplitting distinctions are relevant, so that adjective and noun combo can be regarded as a single unit where no comma is needed for an adjective qualifying the unit. (Cf. a pedantic urban spaceman.)Think you missed a comma.
What do you expect the Russians to do after that?
Are you including here all the troops of the other ministries?A combination of piling more and more resources into Ukraine, a proportion of which will be scraping the barrel, 'popping smoke and declaring victory', and lashing out.
They, imv, do have the raw combat power to take Ukraine east of the Dneipner. However, it would mean stripping the entire Russian military of armour, artillery, and infantry, and combat aircraft, from Vladivostok to Murmansk, and the likelihood of taking material and personnel losses that Russia might take 10 years to recover from.
The question, which I simply don't - and won't pretend to - know the answer to, is whether Putin, and the wider power structures, is prepared to take the gamble of committing that force, and accepting the risk of having a seriously degraded military for the next decade, while the vultures circle....
Are you including here all the troops of the other ministries?
The Honourable Artillery Company says they are, And they are all millionaires so who are we to argue...not really, unless rifles, javelins, slings and muskets are artillery
The Honourable Artillery company says they are, And they are all millionaires so who are we to argue...
(And apparently they have their own detachment of specials in City of London as well.)
Were they really all millionaires?I took a detachment from HAC on my last Afghan tour. They were very good soldiers, I liked them enormously.
Not after kebabking played poker with them.Were they really all millionaires?
Were they really all millionaires?