For me, this war has been characterised by the Russians largely saying the opposite of the truth when speaking of external (of Russia) affairs. It's all very 1984 Orwellian.
It certainly is
Re. Orwell: Was looking at a map of Dugin’s geopolitical conceptualisation of Russia and the rest of the world for the C21st.
The world map divided into 3 areas:
1. The Heartland (Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Mongolia, the ‘stans, parts of Afghanistan)
2. The Rimland (Western Europe, India & other south Asian countries, SE Asia and China)
3. The rest of the world (USA, Central & South America, sub-Saharan Africa, Australasia etc)
Apparently this conceptual map wasn’t designed by Dugin, but he adopted it. Originally done by Sir Halford John Mackinder in 1904, the one I saw has areas 1 & 2 designated ‘Eurasia’!
Not true:
www.chathamhouse.org
Thirty years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia is still peddling the old myth of Western betrayal of Russia by expanding NATO eastward after the end of the Cold War. Both Vladimir Puti…
blogs.lse.ac.uk
I did not know that. Thanks for posting this, an informative read in other aspects too (assuming Chatham House is a reputable source; LSE I would think reliable, it’s hardly a Tory / establishment university)
So if I understood the article correctly, although there were some verbal assurances of no eastward expansion, none were legally binding.
Interesting quote from this article:
“NATO’s Kosovo campaign in 1999 did far more to shape anti-Western attitudes in Russia than NATO enlargement did. Coinciding with a period of extreme weakness in Russia, it represented a crushing defeat for Russian diplomacy”
Didn’t Russia itself asked to join NATO but was rebuffed? (Just after the collapse of the USSR if I recall correctly)