Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

UK music industry, bands, work permits and Brexit

editor said:
I can't think of a single possible negative aspect to Coldplay's decision to stop touring. The same applies if they decided to stop making music too. Or ceased to exist all together.
Click to expand...
Exactly! Yet they're massive, so, apparently, not everyone feels the same way about them.
If the cost of air travel was made so prohibitively high, that only the likes of Coldplay, U2 and Justin Bieber were doing world tours, would you still be defending the rights of bands to tour the world?
A single tour by one of these bands results in a carbon footprint that would necessitate the planting of thousands of hectares of trees to offset it. Do you think that's acceptable?
 
Lupa said:
Well..flying to Spain would have been a massive deal in Ireland. Because it meant flying to London or some other UK airport and then flying to Spain. So tickets were not cheap.

I'm telling you that in my childhood most of the people / families I knew holidayed at local beaches and holiday camps. It really was a very big deal to fly abroad to a sunny country.

1950s was recession.
1970s same.
80s were shite.
People were leaving to try to get work in the UK and US. There were no jobs. So definitely not holidaying in the sun.
It wasnt til the late 90s and 2000s that people started to have a bit extra to go on foreign holidays.
Anyway .. point I am trying ti make is that flights are so cheap now..and that is a problem for the environment
Click to expand...
I don't doubt your circumstances, but the fact is that working class families did holiday abroad in the 1970s in huge numbers, and it wasn't just a few of the better off ones:
By the early 1970s Spain was already accepting a staggering 34.6 million visitors but its coasts had become primarily dependent on the tastes of Northern Europe’s working class, with this tourist on average spending very little by world standards
Click to expand...

And, of course, having an airport offering package holidays close by made it a more attractive and cheaper option.
 
Saul Goodman said:
Exactly! Yet they're massive, so, apparently, not everyone feels the same way about them.
If the cost of air travel was made so prohibitively high, that only the likes of Coldplay, U2 and Justin Bieber were doing world tours, would you still be defending the rights of bands to tour the world?
A single tour by one of these bands results in a carbon footprint that would necessitate the planting of thousands of hectares of trees to offset it. Do you think that's acceptable?
Click to expand...
I don't give a flying fuck if Coldplay, U2 and Justin Bieber never ever toured, performed or recorded again. HTH.
 
Lupa said:
Well..flying to Spain would have been a massive deal in Ireland. Because it meant flying to London or some other UK airport and then flying to Spain. So tickets were not cheap.

I'm telling you that in my childhood most of the people / families I knew holidayed at local beaches and holiday camps. It really was a very big deal to fly abroad to a sunny country.
Click to expand...

As a kid, our family first went aboard in the mid-70's, so flights must have been fairly cheap from the UK.

However, I can vouch that flights between Ireland & the UK were bloody expensive even in the mid-80's, until Virgin started the Standard to Dublin route, then it cost me a lot more on Aer Lingus for the short second leg from Dublin to Shannon.
 
nogojones said:
Is this a picture of young Sass waiting to get his holiday train?

TP-Passenger1870.jpg
Click to expand...

Nah, doesn't have his walking stick.
 
editor said:
I don't doubt your circumstances, but the fact is that working class families did holiday abroad in the 1970s in huge numbers, and it wasn't just a few of the better off ones:


And, of course, having an airport offering package holidays close by made it a more attractive and cheaper option.
Click to expand...

I guess the currency differential must have been favourable at that time. I missed the early 70s and didn't get on a plane til the mid 90s.
 
littlebabyjesus said:
Compulsory hitchhiking points?

May sound mad, but they have it in Cuba. Drivers with space have to stop.

It's a cultural thing as much as anything - bit like attitudes towards speeding and drink driving. You're not taking a passenger? Really? Why not? Didn't you advertise? But yeah, schemes can help - some places have lanes that you can only drive in if you have a passenger.
Click to expand...

have deffo low key ramped up my ' pick up hitchhikers / offer lifts from Lidl' efforts round here over last few years ( with the odd fairly leftfield encounter ensuing ), but to formalise it would make lots of sense
 
Last edited:
Saul Goodman said:
This is all purely academic, anyway, as we are going to run out of oil in the not too distant, so unless we crack the problem of long-haul electric flight, we're heading for a very bleak future.
Click to expand...
Loathe as I am to stop a thread that has splendid beef potential, I think this is right. Ideas about reducing x group of people using Y resource to aid the environment hinge on either self restraint or some kind of tax/price incentive. Free market trumpy/johnsony societies are not going to insert the environment in the way of capital and so 'green capitalism' remains an outright dishonesty. In fact it's a way of carrying on exactly as you are, ideological cover for business as usual. Even if there were tax/price incentives in place to (in this example) reduce bands touring and fans flying to watch those bands, by definition that's also a situation that allows the richest bands and punters to carry on flying and emitting CO2, with perhaps some notional trees planted to allow more stuff being consumed. None of this really changes within our shitty neo-liberal world - yes, we're fucked.

Edit: having read it all, the thread has become less beefy in the last couple of pages. Another thing to blame Coldplay for. :mad:
 
Last edited:
Wilf said:
Loathe as I am to stop a thread that has splendid beef potential, I think this is right. Ideas about reducing x group of people using Y resource to aid the environment hinge on either self restraint or some kind of tax/price incentive. Free market trumpy/johnsony societies are not going to insert the environment in the way of capital and so 'green capitalism' remains an outright dishonesty. In fact it's a way of carrying on exactly as you are, ideological cover for business as usual. Even if there were tax/price incentives in place to (in this example) reduce bands touring and fans flying to watch those bands, by definition that's also a situation that allows the richest bands and punters to carry on flying and emitting CO2, with perhaps some notional trees planted to allow more stuff being consumed. None of this really changes within our shitty neo-liberal world - yes, we're fucked.

Edit: having read it all, the thread has become less beefy in the last couple of pages. Another thing to blame Coldplay for. :mad:
Click to expand...
Airships. Hydrogen powered airships.
 
Anyway, for some of the musicians here this is a topic of some concern, so could we get back to the topic of Brexit and touring bands now, pretty please?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Humberto
Heroin Addiction in the UK
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
181
Views
6K
BristolEcho
BristolEcho
Fez909
Japanese attitudes towards immigration vs UK
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
198
Views
6K
krtek a houby
krtek a houby
hitmouse
Israel/Gaza: UK crackdown and backlash
13 14 15 16 17
Replies
488
Views
26K
teqniq
teqniq
mojo pixy
Immigration to the UK - do you have concerns?
82 83 84 85 86
Replies
3K
Views
81K
kalidarkone
kalidarkone
Kid_Eternity
Is a revolution possible in the UK?
3 4 5 6 7
Replies
195
Views
7K
A380
A380
Back
Top Bottom