Mr.Bishie
pickled egg
£500 for nurses in 8 years is 1% a year eg. less than inflation and a pay DROP.
Why didn't you say that in the first place then?!
Give me strength.
£500 for nurses in 8 years is 1% a year eg. less than inflation and a pay DROP.
That is supposed to be what genius looks likeWhy didn't you say that in the first place then?!
Give me strength.
Hmmm. Quibbling, the figure is closer to £2k for a newly qualified nurse. More than that higher up the pay grades. Probably better to double check your answers before calling other people thick.You fool! My point is really not complicated; £500 for nurses in 8 years is 1% a year eg. less than inflation and a pay DROP.
How can people be so thick as they are here?
If you take away free movement of UK musicians/artists/workers in Europe - and I believe that is a stated aim of the Tories - then it's not 'fear tactics' - it will be the new reality.More fear tactics from the remainers and the gobshite multi millionaires like Geldof
when will it end, another march that will achieve nothing
If you take away free movement of UK musicians/artists/workers in Europe - and I believe that is a stated aim of the Tories - then it's not 'fear tactics' - it will be the new reality.
It their stated aim to withdraw from the single market and the customs union, and to restrict access of people from the EU to the UK for work (treating them like anyone else from outside the EU, I believe is the latest line).Out of interest, where have the Tories stated that one of their aims for Brexit is to 'take away free movement of UK musicians/artists/workers in Europe'?
A consequence (and I agree 100% that it's a likely consequence) is not the same as a stated aim.It their stated aim to withdraw from the single market and the customs union, and to restrict access of people from the EU to the UK for work (treating them like anyone else from outside the EU, I believe is the latest line).
You don't get to restrict access to the UK without the places you're restricting imposing equivalent restrictions. That's how this shit works.
As soon as they found out 73.8% of musicians vote Labour or Green they started discussing it, it's all out there on the webOut of interest, where have the Tories stated that one of their aims for Brexit is to 'take away free movement of UK musicians/artists/workers in Europe'?
I’ve seen 73.6%, but I don’t recognise the figures you’re using.As soon as they found out 73.8% of musicians vote Labour or Green they started discussing it, it's all out there on the web
As you said last time we did this thread, if each country needs a separate work visa it will stop particularly crews from traveling, never mind musicians.. Musicians Union are running a campaign on this issue, but from what I've seen of it it doesn't mention crews as crews aren't part of the MU. I would expect crews to be most affected.I’m not really sure what to think, I do think Geldof is a cunt of the highest order, but I also genuinely don’t know how I’m going to pay the rent if all my touring work dries up overnight.
A consequence (and I agree 100% that it's a likely consequence) is not the same as a stated aim.
Since it's claimed as a stated aim, I was wondering where and when it was stated.
cos ending free movement was pretty obviously something that cuts both ways?
Likely ? No not likely. Inevitable. Part of what is being proposed, in fact. We propose treating people from those countries like X in this country means we propose people from this country being treated like X in those countries.A consequence (and I agree 100% that it's a likely consequence) is not the same as a stated aim.
Since it's claimed as a stated aim, I was wondering where and when it was stated.
It was. It was on the bottom of the busThat wasn't on the bus!!!
The Incorporated Society of Musicians (ISM) issued the warning on the launch of its campaign, Save Music, which is calling on ministers to ensure freedom of movement for musicians post-Brexit.
It argues that touring artists should be treated differently, in the new immigration system. If complete freedom of movement cannot be secured for them in the Brexit negotiations, the campaign is calling for the introduction of two-year working visas for musicians to allow them to tour in Europe. Without these measures, the group warns there will be a severe impact on the music industry.
The ability for Britons to travel freely through the EU is in doubt with no agreement in place for working or travel visas within the EU post-Brexit.
Deborah Annetts, chief executive of the ISM, said: “For decades our musicians have had the right to travel freely across the EU, performing their music in numerous different countries to countless audiences.
“For many musicians this has been of immense value in creating music, establishing their careers and keeping a roof over their heads.”
She added: “The ability to travel freely lies at the heart of creating music – music is universal and knows no boundaries. The very best music often comes from musicians from all walks of life coming together to collaborate.
“The House of Lords EU Select Committee report, published in July 2018, recognised the importance of freedom of movement for musicians and recommended a multi-entry visa enabling creatives, including musicians, to continue to work freely across the EU post-Brexit. We along with many other music organisations believe that a two-year visa is what is needed.”
Annetts warned ministers plans to extend the Permitted Paid Engagement (PPE) visa, which allows entry into the country if you are invited by a UK organisation, could see a repeat of the issues performers had at WOMAD earlier this year.
A worrying article, backing up my earlier concerns:
Musicians could be stopped from touring Europe if no visa deal agreed, warn group
Another letter from musicians worried about Brexit
Top stars and music industry leaders come together to trash Brexit deal
Another letter from musicians worried about Brexit
Top stars and music industry leaders come together to trash Brexit deal
Or perhaps it's entirely relevant to thread that's about musicians commenting on Brexit?It's not really 'musicians' though is it, it's 'top stars and music industry leaders'.
Would you present the views of such people as being worth of uncritical support whatever they were saying, or is it just because you happen to agree with them on this particular issue?
I'd say that people whose livelihoods may be directly effected by Brexit have every right to speak out about it. Why do you want to dismiss their concerns out of hand? How would you like it if people said that same to you if you were worried about your work?Who cares what they think. Why are they any more special/important/interesting than any other group of people blabbing on about it this week.
You've posted an article without comment, ie uncritically, an article which puts forward the views of top stars and music industry leaders (it's in the headline).Or perhaps it's entirely relevant to thread that's about musicians commenting on Brexit?
And yes, I do think Annie Lennox is a musician, you snob, and at no point have I offered my "uncritical support" FFS.
I didn't realise that the failure to deliver an in-depth critique of any relevant link posted in a thread here adds up to a ringing endorsement of the entire content of the article.You've posted an article without comment, ie uncritically, an article which puts forward the views of top stars and music industry leaders (it's in the headline).
I'm not suggesting that Annie Lennox isn't a musician, but she isn't a typical musician, she's a star, and I see no more reason for you to take her position or those of other music industry high-ups as yours than for me to take uncritically the position of Alan Titchmarsh or the leader of Hackney Council as mine just because of my job as a council gardener.
Normally when someone posts up an article without comment, you (rightly) suggest they should explain why they think it's worthy of our attention, maybe even contribute their own thoughts.I didn't realise that the failure to deliver an in-depth critique of any relevant link posted in a thread here adds up to a ringing endorsement of the entire content of the article.
And that's EXACTLY what I did, prefacing the link with the explanatory words, "Another letter from musicians worried about Brexit."Normally when someone posts up an article without comment, you (rightly) suggest they should explain why they think it's worthy of our attention, maybe even contribute their own thoughts.