Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

UK Gas and Electricity Crisis Looming

It's good to see the likes of shell announcing record profits at a time like this

And this cunt sack who earns over half a mil a year, telling people not to ask for pay rises in this time of hyperinflation

 
Cheers for that link, at least it's one less thing for me to worry about!

No worries, when anything news related that involves money comes up, I generally go to MSE as Martin Lewis and his writers put stuff in an easy to read format and explain things very well. It can still be very text heavy at times but at least it tries to simplify what is going on for the general joe bloggs. I see they've started doing video explainers as well for those that prefer to watch.
 
And this cunt sack who earns over half a mil a year, telling people not to ask for pay rises in this time of hyperinflation

Interviewed on Radio 4 this morning he was quite explicit that current inflation was down to energy and goods price increases. Also acknowledged that the BoE was unable to do anything about current inflation; remember this is a key role of the bank. So the solution, according to Bailey, is to ask working people to cut their own living standards, help the BoE meet its target and keep him in post. Perhaps he was being ironic and I just missed it?
 
The worry is that transitory inflation from energy, supply chain issues etc becomes embedded longer-term through the entrenchment of higher inflation expectations..

Inflationary pay rises don't help working people if they lead to higher prices.
 
The worry is that transitory inflation from energy, supply chain issues etc becomes embedded longer-term through the entrenchment of higher inflation expectations..

Inflationary pay rises don't help working people if they lead to higher prices.
The effect of wage push inflation is vastly overstated and it’s only highly ideological economists who make the case for it.

Inflation is a supply side phenomenon. The idea that it has to be dissipated by being absorbed by wages is an obvious manoeuvre by capital.
 
He's probably right from a technical point of view but like most people in his position he doesn't much understand the priorities of the plebs.
I don't think "The BOE says I've got do my bit to fight inflation" is going to cut it with many landlords/utility companies etc when folks can't pay their rent or energy bills.
 
Inflationary pay rises don't help working people if they lead to higher prices.

Deflationary wage cuts (which is what is being called for) don't help working people because they reduce demand and employment. That is on capital's own terms. Maybe the needs of workers aren't the problem; maybe it's the demands of capital? Not a revolutionary idea as was witnessed by much UK post-war politics up until the mid 70s, and is still in evidence elsewhere in Europe.
 
Is it true that the French government have told edf to suck it up and have capped rises to 4%? Whereas our government are going to forcibly lend money to us that we get the privilege of paying back over 5 years so the energy companies don't have to take a hit and our bills go up 54%?

Why the fuck do we just bend over and take this shit on this god forsaken, piss stained Island?
 
have i understood this right?

this year we get a huge increase on bills, less 200 quid

next year, we get this year's huge increase, whatever increase there is next year, and pay 40 quid of this 'loan' back?

makes me wonder if an autumn election during the 'new leader bounce' is the plan?
 
Is it true that the French government have told edf to suck it up and have capped rises to 4%? Whereas our government are going to forcibly lend money to us that we get the privilege of paying back over 5 years so the energy companies don't have to take a hit and our bills go up 54%?

Why the fuck do we just bend over and take this shit on this god forsaken, piss stained Island?
Apparently so...

 
have i understood this right?

this year we get a huge increase on bills, less 200 quid

next year, we get this year's huge increase, whatever increase there is next year, and pay 40 quid of this 'loan' back?

makes me wonder if an autumn election during the 'new leader bounce' is the plan?
Worse, if you don't take the rebate, you will still be subject to the levy over the next 4 years.

It's so fuckin cheap and sleazy, you couldn't make it up...
 
The worry is that transitory inflation from energy, supply chain issues etc becomes embedded longer-term through the entrenchment of higher inflation expectations..

Inflationary pay rises don't help working people if they lead to higher prices.

Higher prices are already here and are not being driven by higher wages. People will use the money for living in a home, heating and lighting it, buying food, cooking the food... things they already have to do for a standard quality of life.

Transitory is looking a bit optimistic now, but workers are expected to bet their wages on it?
 
So the solution, according to Bailey, is to ask working people to cut their own living standards, help the BoE meet its target and keep him in post. Perhaps he was being ironic and I just missed it?

No, you didn't miss anything at all. Your first instinct was correct. The arrogance of this man - currently earning £500, 000+ a year - is clear to see. He is just another example - like most in power in this country at the moment - of someone at the top who is totally devoid of any understanding or empathy of how the ordinary person is trying to make ends meet as best they can. People like him essentially don't care about people like us. They never have and never will.
 
Its entirely typical of the sort of topics that inevitably come up when inflationary feedback loops are feared by those whose roles involving trying to manage such situations. We've had decades without that stuff but now its back its no surprise that these old themes reemerge.

They are clearly rusty when it comes to talking about that shit without putting their foot right in it publicly.
 
Deflationary wage cuts (which is what is being called for) don't help working people because they reduce demand and employment. That is on capital's own terms. Maybe the needs of workers aren't the problem; maybe it's the demands of capital? Not a revolutionary idea as was witnessed by much UK post-war politics up until the mid 70s, and is still in evidence elsewhere in Europe.

It's not deflationary wage cuts that are being argued for. It's pay rises that anticipate future inflation that should be avoided.

Anyone who thinks the BoE governor should step outside their mandate and start prioritising personal finances over macroeconomics is naive.
 
Is it true that the French government have told edf to suck it up and have capped rises to 4%? Whereas our government are going to forcibly lend money to us that we get the privilege of paying back over 5 years so the energy companies don't have to take a hit and our bills go up 54%?

Why the fuck do we just bend over and take this shit on this god forsaken, piss stained Island?
I vote to be annexed by France, then.
 
Deflationary wage cuts (which is what is being called for) don't help working people because they reduce demand and employment. That is on capital's own terms. Maybe the needs of workers aren't the problem; maybe it's the demands of capital? Not a revolutionary idea as was witnessed by much UK post-war politics up until the mid 70s, and is still in evidence elsewhere in Europe.

Wage restraint, as trumpeted by Heath and co.
 
It's not deflationary wage cuts that are being argued for. It's pay rises that anticipate future inflation that should be avoided.

Anyone who thinks the BoE governor should step outside their mandate and start prioritising personal finances over macroeconomics is naive.
They are real terms wage cuts; ie. below inflation wage rises. That is their point. I wasn't arguing that he should prioritise the needs of working people over the needs of capital, which is what your antisocial personal finance versus macroeconomics formulation is actually saying. I was pointing out his uselessness in meeting those needs.

Cheers - Louis MacNeice
 
Sunak in full of shit shocker. Also according to the article everybody has to have the £200 and then pay it back. No choice.

I am so surprised that we haven't had some serious civil disturbance at various points over the last 10 years. I suspect that the longer it takes to happen, the huger it will be...and maybe it will be something like this that pushes people beyond their fear of reprisals and gets them out on the streets.
 
This is the massive flaw in Sunak's Logic, that energy prices will come down next year when they are at least as likely to go up. So what then we pay back £40 but get given another £200 so in 2024 we pay back £80 and so on ad nauseum.
I'm lucky enough to not need that money so why is he giving it me and sticking me with a pointless debt whether it's interest free or not? A better idea would be to target it or even better just stick an extra £5 per week on benefits but that isn't idealogically acceptable of course.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom