Transphobes gunning hard for 'paedophilia' angle all of a sudden

[hitmouse]

It's true, the only people who dare speak up against the dreaded trans activists have been completely driven out of their careers, like JK Rowling and Rishi Sunak.

 

[editor]

But the ones being vilified are those with views different from that of trans gender activists and supporters. It's not the other way around.

How often do you actually encounter militant trans gender activists and supporters in real life? Or are you just being played like a fiddle by right wing hate groups, keen to stir up shit?

 

[hitmouse]

I had been thinking that gnomes seem to be very "in" this season, I hope this crap poster doesn't do anything to dent the current boom in gnome popularity.

 

[Knotted]

There's a difference between having a difference of views and objecting to someone endangering you or a group of vulnerable people through spreading lies and vilification. No one has to be polite about that latter.

Also the whole term 'trans activist' is used to make people seem extreme, like their whole life is shouting about trans issues or making unreasonable demands, and people are called it even for making a few supportive media posts. But activist sounds scarier than ally, supporter or 'trans person who just wants to get on with their life, than you very much'.

I think it's also used to suggest that trans activists are persuading kids that they are trans.

 

[Dystopiary]

Sorry, the exception is not the rule. The photo and your caption do not apply. IMO.

That post is very much relevant. Rowling and many others openly support the anti-trans endeavours of the person who held that event. (There are lots of receipts.)

 

[Raheem]

Where have you been cancelled from, so far?

How many times are they allowed to count Urban?

 

[Monkeygrinder's Organ]

It's true, the only people who dare speak up against the dreaded trans activists have been completely driven out of their careers, like JK Rowling and Rishi Sunak.

Yeah but you're missing that the power here is held by students at Goldsmith's University, not 'Prime Ministers' or 'Billionaire Authors' and the like.

 

[NoXion]

But the ones being vilified are those with views different from that of trans gender activists and supporters. It's not the other way around.

The eliminationist rhetoric coming from anti-trans quarters is vile, yes.

 

[The Gnome]

Do you The Gnome believe, say a misogynist, should have an equal platform to someone they abuse and hate? just for balance like?

I've not heard of one single person admitting to misogyny so shouldn't the better point to raise be who determines whether one is a misogynist or not and should that person be given an equal platform to defend himself?

 

[The Gnome]

You probably got banned previously for this kind of dicking about.

Zero sympathy for you.

Banned? I'm sorry, but I've never been banned anywhere.

 

[belboid]

I've not heard of one single person admitting to misogyny so shouldn't the better point to raise be who determines whether one is a misogynist or not and should that person be given an equal platform to defend himself?

Your terf mates say that all ‘trans activists’ are misogynists.

 

[hitmouse]

Banned? I'm sorry, but I've never been banned anywhere.

It's never too late to try new things.

 

[krtek a houby]

Banned? I'm sorry, but I've never been banned anywhere.

So all your talk about being cancelled is the usual fake victim hood from the usual transphobic talking points.

 

[The Gnome]

Your terf mates say that all ‘trans activists’ are misogynists.

No. That's what YOU say.

 

[nino_savatte]

But the ones being vilified are those with views different from that of trans gender activists and supporters. It's not the other way around.

I'm only surprised you didn't throw in the word 'ideology' to reinforce your crappy claim. You have an ideology, too, and it's not a very nice one.

 

[The Gnome]

So all your talk about being cancelled is the usual fake victim hood from the usual transphobic talking points.

Victimhood is when anything and everything that is contrary to your transgender beliefs and agenda is considered and treated as transphobic. A man who is not sexually attracted to a trans woman is transphobic!

 

[Jennaonthebeach]

Bullshit.

 

[The Gnome]

I'm only surprised you didn't throw in the word 'ideology' to reinforce your crappy claim. You have an ideology, too, and it's not a very nice one.

But isn't it the truth -- that those with views contrary to transgender activism are vilified? I mean, JK Rowlings? Martina Navratilova? Riley Gaines? Kathleen Stock? Et al., et al., et al.

 

[nino_savatte]

But isn't it the truth -- that those with views contrary to transgender activism are vilified? I mean, JK Rowlings? Martina Navratilova? Riley Gaines? Kathleen Stock? Et al., et al., et al.

Whose truth are you talking about? The only people who chuck around phrases like "transgender activism" are people who have an adjacency to far-right politics and who are biological absolutists. Do you have a problem with differences, or is it certain kinds of differences that you have a problem with?

Biological absolutism/determinism isn't the truth either, chief.

You're just a few feet away from advocating eugenics as a solution.

 

[krtek a houby]

Victimhood is when anything and everything that is contrary to your transgender beliefs and agenda is considered and treated as transphobic. A man who is not sexually attracted to a trans woman is transphobic!

Deep cover Daily Mail hacks aren't what they used to be

 

[The Gnome]

Bullshit.

I know. Reminds me of a trans Starbuck worker who felt victimised by a woman for, apparently, misgendering him. Or her. And then proceeded to assault the man or woman taking a video of the apparently transphobic event.

 

[Tanya1982]

But isn't it the truth -- that those with views contrary to transgender activism are vilified? I mean, JK Rowlings? Martina Navratilova? Riley Gaines? Kathleen Stock? Et al., et al., et al.

You seem very invested, for someone who isn’t invested, isn’t involved, and hasn’t been banned from anywhere ever for discussing your interest. I recognise the first two names of course, but not the third or fourth, and have no idea who might be signified by the et al - although no doubt you can reel them off. Do you think you’ve maybe got an unhealthy fixation that’s manifesting as paranoia and a sense of victimhood? A need to feel vicarious persecution.

 

[nino_savatte]

I know. Reminds me of a trans Starbuck worker who felt victimised by a woman for, apparently, misgendering him. Or her. And then proceeded to assault the man or woman taking a video of the apparently transphobic event.

I don't believe you.

 

[Jennaonthebeach]

Yeah, live and let live. The trouble is, most trans activists themselves seem to be incapable of following that very same adage.

Most trans activists emphatically demand and expect tolerance for and acceptance of their own trans gender beliefs and advocacy, but seem to be incapable of giving contrary views the same virtue of tolerance and acceptance. They tell others what to think, but can't seem to hack it when others push back and say No.

Most anti-trans activists are made of dog shit and smell.

See? I can just say shit i made up too.

 

[krtek a houby]

I know. Reminds me of a trans Starbuck worker who felt victimised by a woman for, apparently, misgendering him. Or her. And then proceeded to assault the man or woman taking a video of the apparently transphobic event.

Where do you stand on misgendering ?

 

[Jennaonthebeach]

Exactly my point. ^ If you have a different view, then they get you cancelled.

I've yet to find two trans people who agree on everything, and many who don't agree on anything. So you can fuck off with all this paranoid android nonsense.

 

[The Gnome]

Whose truth are you talking about? The only people who chuck around phrases like "transgender activism" are people who have an adjacency to far-right politics and who are biological absolutists. Do you have a problem with differences, or is it certain kinds of differences that you have a problem with?

Biological absolutism/determinism isn't the truth either, chief.

You're just a few feet away from advocating eugenics as a solution.

Sorry, you are stating your own conclusions. You have to argue for it successfully to be accepted.

I do not have a problem with differences. Cultural, societal, racial, gender and sex, opinions. If you look at it closely, it is you who has a problem with differences of opinions. You want me to swallow what you say hook, line and sinker and if I don't then I get to be the one who has a problem with differences!

I don't know about absolutism, but biology is non debatable particularly when it comes to sex.

Eugenics??!! Why does it even occur to you! Seriously?

 

[Jennaonthebeach]

If you mean intolerance coming from people demanding tolerance. Then, yes, that's the trouble. IMO, at least.

you getting your slogans from MAGA hats TM right?

 

[belboid]

I know. Reminds me of a story I have completely made up for the purpose of an argument on the internet with people I don't know.

cfy

 

[Jennaonthebeach]

I don't believe you.

I remember this one. Some horrible woman went into a fast food joint and decided to have a go at the trans woman serving her, in the most abusive way possible, just because she was trans. It was not just misgendering - it was assault.