Stabbings and shootings happen all the time.Blocking someone from speaking in a particular venue happens all the time, and is only controversial here because it's a contested space. Fascists are fairly broadly barred from speaking in LGBT pubs (which amazingly do not suddenly become fascist themselves when doing so).
But anyway. Blocking. I'm not sure you've got a great big whopping list of left wingers who've been physically opposed or cancelled from speaking at university debates.
As for "LGBT" venues. It's LGBTQIA+ ya fucking bigot!!!!! Been to loads of them, not much politics going on, but clearly I missed all the meetings that would have been about LGBTQIA+ rights. But there would have still been "fascists" at those meetings, the gay, lesbian, trans ones who had a common interest in protecting LGBTQIA+ rights. Or are you saying that you have to be straight to be a fascist?
Communists don't get to go on Newsnight for the same reason the far right doesn't get a look in - A handful of elected councilors and that's it.
If you got one MP elected, you'd be on Newsnight. Not much, but they would be on every now and then.
Man City fans will probably get a kicking if they walk into the Trafford on match day and start singing the Munich song.
- They would have bought tickets for the Man United end . That's something they're not entitled to do.
- It would have been a public order offence.
- Kathleen Stock was invited to speak at the venue, her presence there would not have been a public order offence.
She can write books, have newspaper columns and go on the telly whenever she likes - in fact her voice is fucking everywhere. She is not in any realistic sense censored, quite the opposite - her voice is materially privileged through extraordinary media access.
The reason why our brightest minds need to debate in universities is totally lost on you.
Both sides need to test their arguments and there is no better way of doing it than debate against people who have the totally opposite position. Everyone wins if that happens. Because you never know, something might be said that would inspire someone to find a way that appeases everyone to the point we're all moist between the legs.
How can we improve anything, if we can't critisize with those who may disagree?
would counter that expecting to be able to deliver hate speeches unhindered whenever and wherever you like suggests a seriously entitled attitude.
We have hate speech laws. We are in what is supposed to be a democracy. There's a democratic framework for people to get the laws updated if they believe they are wrong.
What has this woman said that comes close to being hate given that she hasn't been carted off by the cops and charged with anything?