no, it has nothing to do with you not agreeing with 'some ideas of the un-reconstructed left'.Ha, Ha, just because I don't agree with some ideas of the un-reconstructed left I am a Tory or even a liberal democratic(Hocus)
I certainly am proud I was never a member of the SWP for example.
Day 1: declare your 'devastation' at the murder of Jo CoxHa, Ha, just because I don't agree with some ideas of the un-reconstructed left I am a Tory or even a liberal democratic(Hocus)
I certainly am proud I was never a member of the SWP for example.
to their credit they wouldn't have had youI certainly am proud I was never a member of the SWP for example.
so do tell me why it's always the left - liberal and otherwise - for which you reserve your sneersDisgusting smears, this board is becoming rank
some of its posters anyway.
good. and close the door after you.Because they could do so so much more and begin to resemble a real opposition
anyway, out of here for now.
putting the national back in socialist eh?plenty of new charities for refugees, no problem with that, but you seem to have one?
its great how right wing people always see themselves as victims. today if anyone mentions the fact the guy who killed Cox was a far rightist they are immediately trying to `politicise/smear` etc. incredible. and consistent.Disgusting smears, this board is becoming rank
some of its posters anyway.
Stoke, Merthyr, Birmingham, Manchester and even rural Shropshire, the same lines recurred: so unchanging that they threatened to turn into cliches, but all the more powerful because of their ubiquity. “I’m scared about the future” … “No one listens to us” … “If you haven’t got money, no one cares.”
If the article supports any conclusion, it's more that the working class feels scared, unlistened to, uncared about and utterly powerless, none of which suggest revolt any time soon.Britain is in the midst of a working-class revolt
Brexit Land - I'm really wanting someone to make a spoof of Brexit using the music to Soft Cell's 'Bedsit Land'.
Well the obvious tiny crack here which could lead to a Labour government is the fact that a Leave vote would undoubtedly lead to the ouster of David Cameron though we obviously don't know whether that would lead to new elections or not. I'm not sure if he will be able to stay on either way to be honest, the Tory base and so many Tory MPs are openly baying for his blood. In the event of new elections it is very unlikely that we will get a Labour majority but I do think it is quite likely that the Tories would lose theirs, and in any case having elections before the planned gerrymandering of constituencies would be a significant blow to the Tories.
There's a whole of snide assumptions and dishonesty in this post.
First of all the use of support in the 1st paragraph, where support has become (either deliberately or accidentally I'm not sure) a synonym for voting remain. This is absolute nonsense, as much nonsense as arguing that because people vote Tory/Labour/LibDem/etc they don't support the re-nationalisation of the railways. Or that if people voted Labour in 2005 they must have Iraq War supporters. Many (most?) Remain voters, and certainly most of those on the Left don't support the EU at all, they simple consider staying in the EU a better alternative than leaving.
It's for that reason that I haven't simply called everyone who has said they support Remain liberal wankers. I (and I'm not alone here) have repeatedly said that I believe there are arguments for voting remain from a left wing basis. I think they are wrong, but I don't think the people holding such a viewpoint are liberals or wankers or stupid. I've certainly called some Remain supporters liberals (and I stand by those comments) but's because of the reasons they are arguing for a Remain vote not because they are arguing for a Remain vote alone.
As for the last paragraph, well I've not seen anyone on U75 argue that a successful Leave vote is going to be a "massive blow to the status quo is going to put neo-liberalism on the back foot". What I have seen people argue is that it will disrupt capital, and that opens up possibilities for labour.
What I have seen people argue is that it will disrupt capital, and that opens up possibilities for labour.
Well the obvious tiny crack here which could lead to a Labour government is the fact that a Leave vote would undoubtedly lead to the ouster of David Cameron though we obviously don't know whether that would lead to new elections or not. I'm not sure if he will be able to stay on either way to be honest, the Tory base and so many Tory MPs are openly baying for his blood. In the event of new elections it is very unlikely that we will get a Labour majority but I do think it is quite likely that the Tories would lose theirs, and in any case having elections before the planned gerrymandering of constituencies would be a significant blow to the Tories.
Tony Blair and two former deputy prime ministers, Lord Heseltine and Nick Clegg, have launched a late plea to voters to reject “division, isolationism and blame” and vote on Thursday to stay in the EU.
After the tragic killing of Labour MP Jo Cox, they say the country is living in “worrying times” in which people must work together and unite, not pull each other apart.
I don't see any reason to believe Brexit works better than remaining in this respect. A vote to remain would leave the Tories massively divided and ripe for a coup. The next election would be fought on a re run of the referendum and as 'One Nation' (sic) Tories will baulk at going against the result UKIP can stand unopposed for leaving. Tories will defect in large numbers and Labour could run on pro EU, but with large scale reform, ticket.
Leave and the transition to Team Bojo is seamless, the rationale for UKIP disappears and the next Tory majority seismic.
Yeah, seismic!. I'll quote you on this if a leave vote actually wins out. You'll be wrong, btw.
Disillusionment when, economically, things don't change/get worse.Because? What is going to happen to disrupt the Tories chances if we vote leave?