Jesus this stuff is banal…Corbyn and Kemi have the same entitled petulance of character. Starmer doesn’t share that. This doesn’t mean he doesn’t have faults or that they’re not obvious but that’s not the point being made here. It’s really not rocket science and having to explain this is really quite tedious…!I think your love for Starmer has blinded you to his very obvious faults. Oh, and why are you calling Badenoch by her first name? Are you and her bessie mates?
Absolutely. The contrast means Starmer has less reason to have to define himself, whereas Cleverly would have been a big optics problem for Starmer.TBF she's likely going to make Starmer look a political genius in comparison.
Oh well yeah you missed quite a bit of Corbyn being crabby!No, I have not seen Corbyn behaving like that in interviews. I do not have television. Perhaps you can give an example.
They are very similar inflexible personalities, who believe so much in their own rightness they can’t cope when challenged. I would say one difference is Kemi is easily Corbyn’s intellectual superior (which tbf isn’t hard as Corbyn isn’t exactly a bright mind)…How is Badenoch anything like Corbyn. WTAF.
Easier to write Corbyn and Kemi.Kemi? Is she your fucking mate?
Eta: oops... just realised it's that dick Kid Eternity
Jeremy is easier to type than Corbyn because you can do the 'ere' bit very fast.Easier to write Corbyn and Kemi.
Corbyn is a better definition given there are other Jeremy’s…Jeremy is easier to type than Corbyn because you can do the 'ere' bit very fast.
And you expect me to accept your claim about Corbyn's interview style without proof?Oh well yeah you missed quite a bit of Corbyn being crabby!
Corbyn could be a right snarky git if he didn’t like a question, it’s true. But Starmer just looks dumbfounded and repeats an answer to a different question. He doesn’t understand how anyone could disagree with his vacuous bullshit.Jesus this stuff is banal…Corbyn and Kemi have the same entitled petulance of character. Starmer doesn’t share that. This doesn’t mean he doesn’t have faults or that they’re not obvious but that’s not the point being made here. It’s really not rocket science and having to explain this is really quite tedious…!
Given your attitude I really think you should spend your time.And you expect me to accept your claim about Corbyn's interview style without proof?
And let's not forget that, using this method, he managed to agree live on air that starving Gazans was ok.Corbyn could be a right snarky git if he didn’t like a question, it’s true. But Starmer just looks dumbfounded and repeats an answer to a different question. He doesn’t understand how anyone could disagree with his vacuous bullshit.
That face can't lie, oh dear .
Hahahaha!Politics not about how people come across in interviews.
Yes, it is highly amusing that the man who would end austerity is "crabby" in interviews, according to you, but the man who would continue austerity does well in interviews, according to you. I am sure that people are laughing all the way to the Foodbank.Hahahaha!
You forget how superficial k_e is. Parliamentary cretinism 101.Yes, it is highly amusing that the man who would end austerity is "crabby" in interviews, according to you, but the man who would continue austerity does well in interviews, according to you. I am sure that people are laughing all the way to the Foodbank.
Some of us like to deal with political reality rather than our dreams and doing nothing but posting about them…You forget how superficial k_e is. Parliamentary cretinism 101.
A better world isn't possible.Some of us like to deal with political reality rather than our dreams and doing nothing but posting about them…
the whole world, its history and its future are not directed and determined by a majority of votes of just that very representative institution that has the honour of having them in the capacity of its members.Some of us like to deal with political reality rather than our dreams and doing nothing but posting about them…
When Starmer and Co have spent 5 years with a boot on the throat of the left, enthusiastically encouraged by nodding Churchill dogs like yourself...Some of us like to deal with political reality rather than our dreams and doing nothing but posting about them…
When Starmer and Co have spent 5 years with a boot on the throat of the left, enthusiastically encouraged by nodding Churchill dogs like yourself...
If, come the next general election, I don't vote Labour; and the Tories/Reform/some unholy alliance of the 2 get into power:
Is it (a) my fault; or
(b) yours?
No need for wanky politico extended answers to a question not asked. A simple A or B will suffice.