Paying tax on the amount of land you own.There is a land tax it's called Stamp Duty or do you have some other scheme in mind
Paying tax on the amount of land you own.There is a land tax it's called Stamp Duty or do you have some other scheme in mind
Paying tax on the amount of land you own.
Oi, hang on a minute, why should I pay more tax for having a much larger garden than the neigbour to the left of me, when it adds nothing to the overall value of the property?
How does a larger garden not add to the value of the property?
Because most people looking to buy this place wouldn't want such a massive garden, and the nightmare of maintaining it, it's a proper pain TBH.
* This is the view of three different local estate agents.
Weird. Not like that round here.
I wasn’t really thinking of dwellings that workers enjoy.Oi, hang on a minute, why should I pay more tax for having a much larger garden than the neigbour to the left of me, when it adds nothing to the overall value of the property?
I think parity between the tax on labour and the tax on capital would yield more revenue, tbh.I’d like to see a land tax. That would presumably raise a lot more revenue than regressive taxes on vices.
Sir Keir Starmer is paying a far greater proportion of his earnings in tax than Rishi Sunak despite the Prime Minister making 10 times more.The Labour leader paid £118,580 in tax on earnings of £359,720 over the last two years, the summary of his tax return showed. That made his effective tax rate 33%.
Mr Sunak, who earned £3.7 million over the same period, paid a rate of about 22% in tax because most of his earnings came from capital gains.
Income tax on salaries is charged at a higher rate than on capital gains, which cover assets such as properties and shares.
In lots of countries people pay an annual land tax.There is a land tax it's called Stamp Duty or do you have some other scheme in mind
With the same revelation has babies, kittens and puppies are cute and bears shit in the woods come the realisation that Jeremy Hunt is a twat.'While a cut in national insurance would on its own save workers hundreds of pounds a year, the effect of the tax cut would be outweighed by the Treasury’s decision to freeze the salary thresholds for both national insurance and income tax in cash terms.
Calculations by the Resolution Foundation show that only those paid between £27,000 and £59,000 a year will be better off as a result of both the autumn statement and Wednesday’s budget, once the freeze in thresholds are accounted for. Those paid £16,000 will lose almost £500 a year, as will those receiving more than £60,000.'
Jeremy Hunt to cut national insurance by 2p in budget
Pre-election giveaway should save average earner £450 a year but spending cuts may followwww.theguardian.com
£46 a month extra for me.
I really can't see amounts like that convincing many to vote Tory after the cost of living debacle.
Or possibly the tea and coffee had been spiked with something
He is announcing an anti waste plan for empty cupboards the wanker.