Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
Someone should have told Reagan: never put your glasses somewhere that people might sit on them.
Someone should have told Reagan: never put your glasses somewhere that people might sit on them.
My bold, who knew?...
While the Hollande call on Jan. 28 did touch on pressing matters between the two countries — namely the fight against the Islamic State — Trump also used the exchange to vent about his personal fixations, including his belief that the United States is being taken advantage of by China and by international bodies like NATO, the official said.
At one point, Trump declared that the French can continue protecting NATO, but that the U.S. “wants our money back,” the official said, adding that Trump seemed to be “obsessing over money."
“It was a difficult conversation, because he talks like he’s speaking publicly,” the official said. “It's not the usual way heads of state speak to each other. He speaks with slogans and the conversation was not completely organized.”
...
Keerching!
most of who?
I've had diatribes from people living in coastal America saying similar about the Brexit debate/result, though they've been less polite. tmm we have to accept that what is entirely incomprehensible from one perspective makes perfect sense from another. And as the recent detailed breakdown of the ref results confirms, educational background, geographic location and age are all massively important in determining our views.
So youngish, well educated Brits saying that Trumps behaviour on Twitter is awful cuts no ice. When I start hearing the same things on the phoneins on rightwing talk radio in Arkensaw or Texas I'll start to wonder if he's losing his touch.
christ the old lines. Paid agitators, proffesional protestors etc
oldest one in the book 'protesters given 10 pounds drink money and a packed lunch' looooool never happened
The main predictor for trump was having voted republican before, in fact. The main difference this time was fewer voters of colour thought it worthwhile to vote for Clinton.Where is "Arkensaw?"
You do realise that the vote for Trump was spread across the socio-economic classes in the US, right? The main predictor of support for Trump was and is race, along with views on abortion. Whether white folks think his tweets and speeches are adorable or embarrassing, as long as he gets abortion banned, they can deal.
christ the old lines. Paid agitators, proffesional protestors etc
oldest one in the book 'protesters given 10 pounds drink money and a packed lunch' looooool never happened
I'd be doing a lot more of it if they were laying on beer and sandwichesIf only eh
Uh, voter supression?The main predictor for trump was having voted republican before, in fact. The main difference this time was fewer voters of colour thought it worthwhile to vote for Clinton.
No, it wasn't (overwhelmingly) voter suppression, it was an unappealing candidate.Uh, voter supression?
80 odd percent of African Americans voted for Clinton, across the socio-economic classes. Similar proportions of white folks voted Trump. He still lost the popular vote though, by a long stretch.
I'd be doing a lot more of it if they were laying on beer and sandwiches
Indeed and I'm pretty sure that "80 odd percent of African Americans voted for Clinton" is also bollocks. Even if you make it 80 odd percent of the African Americans electorate voted for Clinton, I think it's on dodgy ground as you'd need a near 100% turnout of that group.No, it wasn't (overwhelmingly) voter suppression, it was an unappealing candidate.
And as for 80 odd percent of 'white folks' voting for Trump, that's an alternative fact all of your own, as big as any of The Donald's.
No, it wasn't (overwhelmingly) voter suppression, it was an unappealing candidate.
And as for 80 odd percent of 'white folks' voting for Trump, that's an alternative fact all of your own, as big as any of The Donald's.
Remember yesterday Trump wanted to know the name of the Senator so he could destroy his career? well, this is him:
No, you're still wrong. Do you actually know what an exit poll is?
exit polls are surveys of a small percentage of voters taken after they leave their voting place. pollsters use this data to project how all voters or segments of voters side on a particular race or ballot measure.
Leach is a senator in the Pennsylvania General Assembly. Agree with his sentiments, but he wasn't the target, as the meeting with Sheriffs was in Texas.
It's most likely Texas State Senator Juan Hinojosa the Sheriff had in mind.
And your evidence race wasn't a significant factor in the US election is what exactly?No, you're still wrong. Do you actually know what an exit poll is?
From your own link
No worries. I like Leach's attitude. I hope the tide is turning, but still wish there were more Democrat politicians cottoning on to the fact that the situation is way beyond the bounds of normal and they need to get their shit together and oppose the administration by all means necessary.Ah, OK. I assumed it was him because of the phrasing
somewhere abroadWhere is "Arkensaw?"
Aye, like said talk shows would entertain people phoning in to renounce their belief in Trumpmost of who?
I've had diatribes from people living in coastal America saying similar about the Brexit debate/result, though they've been less polite. tmm we have to accept that what is entirely incomprehensible from one perspective makes perfect sense from another. And as the recent detailed breakdown of the ref results confirms, educational background, geographic location and age are all massively important in determining our views.
So youngish, well educated Brits saying that Trumps behaviour on Twitter is awful cuts no ice. When I start hearing the same things on the phoneins on rightwing talk radio in Arkensaw or Texas I'll start to wonder if he's losing his touch.
It's going to be interesting, this fight Trump V the judiciary, the outcome will clearly define the next few years.