According to the BBC news Putin would prefer Biden over Trump in the whitehouse. Perhaps he could get his hackers to rig the election.
Yep. And he may well judge that making it be known that he would prefer Biden helps Trump.Ignore Putin's words and instead pay attention to his actions. Both the DNC and the RNC got hacked, but it was the DNC's stuff that got leaked all over the place. It was the Republicans who got the Russian thumb on the scales in their favour during the election. The NRA got Russian funding. Putin gave Tucker Carlson an interview. The pattern of actions is consistent. The words are worthless fluff.
Which election? Last one where trump lost or the one before when he won?Ignore Putin's words and instead pay attention to his actions. Both the DNC and the RNC got hacked, but it was the DNC's stuff that got leaked all over the place. It was the Republicans who got the Russian thumb on the scales in their favour during the election. The NRA got Russian funding. Putin gave Tucker Carlson an interview. The pattern of actions is consistent. The words are worthless fluff.
“Defendant’s motions to dismiss have been denied,” Merchan said, before adding: “We’re moving ahead to jury selection on March 25.”
The trial date means the Manhattan case will be the first of four criminal cases against Trump to go before a jury. While the trial date was open and shut for Merchan, Trump’s team fought his scheduling decision, claiming it violated Trump’s rights. Trump’s attorney Todd Blanche pointed to the ex-president’s classified documents case in Florida, which is expected to start in May.
Trump could not possibly prepare for that trial, Blanche argued, if he were present for the Manhattan case.
“That is a constitutional violation in our view, judge,” Blanche said of Trump being unable to prepare for his defense in the other case, later saying: “It’s truly an impossible position for anyone to be in.”
Maybe he just can't fucking stand Trump, and can you blame him?Putin only has to say it once for all the dipshits to go ‘look, here’s proof Putin supports Biden not Trump, election interference was a lie, case proven’. That’s possibly why it was done.
Monster Raving Loony Party are part of the shadowy behind the scenes systemThey don't control what the actual results are but they do control who has the money to stand and what those standing stand for. It's not so different here. We live in heavily 'managed' democracies.
I'd say they were pretty good, we're the Republicans to put forward a credible candidate...instead they have Donald Trump comparing himself to Al CaponeThe real issue is: what are the chances of a fair election? I'd rate them as pretty slim. There's just too much at stake now, WW3 is looming, and the US Deep State is simply not prepared to take a chance of going into WW3 with Trump as Commander-in-Chief.
The real issue is: what are the chances of a fair election? I'd rate them as pretty slim. There's just too much at stake now, WW3 is looming, and the US Deep State is simply not prepared to take a chance of going into WW3 with Trump as Commander-in-Chief.
Yes, they'll tolerate anyone they can control. But they can't control Trump. That's why the MSM frenzy against him is unprecedented. It shows how tight their leash usually is.I'd say they were pretty good, we're the Republicans to put forward a credible candidate...instead they have Donald Trump comparing himself to Al Capone
Sedition. By an out going President unwilling to accept the 'will of the people' that is what was unprecedented.Yes, they'll tolerate anyone they can control. But they can't control Trump. That's why the MSM frenzy against him is unprecedented. It shows how tight their leash usually is.
You stupid fucking gullible conspiracy swallowing idiot. You're banned from this thread now.The real issue is: what are the chances of a fair election? I'd rate them as pretty slim. There's just too much at stake now, WW3 is looming, and the US Deep State is simply not prepared to take a chance of going into WW3 with Trump as Commander-in-Chief.
No evidence Joe was involved? Not soForgiven a shedload of student debt
Trillion dollar infrastructure bill
Economy and job figures all up
Little personal issues (Hunter Biden stuff is embarrassing but no evidence thus far Joe was involved, and the Republicans are being made to look silly in the hearings regarding it).
Already beaten Trump in an election.
I understand he's not going to get motors running on this board, but for your US voters (most Dems and undecideds) he's not had a bad first 4 years tbh.
Who else would you go with?
Speaking as a disinterested but appalled bystander:No evidence Joe was involved? Not so
Thought somebody would say thatSpeaking as a disinterested but appalled bystander:
do you have receipts for that or shall we just take your word for it?
Forgiven a shedload of student debt
Trillion dollar infrastructure bill
Economy and job figures all up
Little personal issues (Hunter Biden stuff is embarrassing but no evidence thus far Joe was involved, and the Republicans are being made to look silly in the hearings regarding it).
Already beaten Trump in an election.
Thought somebody would say that
Took 5 seconds to find this
Ok you want to defend Biden: count me outand 5 more to find these.
https://archive.ph/vaDFGWhat’s behind Republicans’ claim that Joe Biden received $40,000 of ‘laundered Chinese money’? - Poynter
Available evidence does not show that the money, from Biden's sister-in-law, was obtained illegally. The White House said it was repayment of a loan.www.poynter.org
and 5 more to find these.
https://archive.ph/vaDFGWhat’s behind Republicans’ claim that Joe Biden received $40,000 of ‘laundered Chinese money’? - Poynter
Available evidence does not show that the money, from Biden's sister-in-law, was obtained illegally. The White House said it was repayment of a loan.www.poynter.org
Yes both parties are riddling with grifting crooksThe funniest part was when it emerged that the clown leading the Oversight Committee had also loaned his brother money, in circumstances sketchier than the Biden loan
"Can't make this up": Dems call out Comer over $200K loan to brother
Comer has zeroed in on Biden's loan to his brother as evidence of family's "shady business practices."www.salon.com
FFS
The Supreme Court will decide if ex-President Donald Trump is immune from being prosecuted on charges of trying to overturn the 2020 election.
The decision has the potential to seriously delay the trial, which was originally scheduled for March.
Arguments in the Supreme Court case are scheduled for the week of 22 April, and any trial will have to wait until after a decision is made.
Although a decision could come swiftly, the justices could rule that the former president is immune from prosecution, or issue a decision that further delays legal action.
Justice Department guidelines limit prosecutorial action in politically sensitive investigations from within 60 days of an election - meaning prosecutors face a deadline of early September.
And if Mr Trump wins in November, there is a growing possibility that the case never reaches trial. His Justice Department officials could drop or indefinitely suspend the special counsel investigation or he could take the unprecedented step of issuing a pardon for himself.
Trump immunity claim: Top US court agrees to hear case in April - BBC News
Justices will decide if Donald Trump has presidential immunity from election fraud charges.www.bbc.co.uk
Ok you want to defend Biden: count me out