I couldn't use it easily on my phone, but the le monde map of seats/votes it looked like the centrist alliance had split the left vote in some places in the South, letting the fascists in.
People mostly voted against it so as not to give the Lib Dems any kind of victory, following their decision to get in bed with the Tories. I doubt many looked at what it was about in detail, it was just a free hit on Clegg and to make sure he got nothing for his treachery (though I think they later had the great success of getting the carrier bag tax through, in exchange for backing welfare cuts).We had a referendum on AV 11 years ago which would have meant you could do that, you don't need two rounds, you just need to go 1,2,3, etc., yet everybody voted against it.: o/
Paris, the most expensive city in France, where apartments frequently go for over €10,000 per square metre, indeed elected twelve NFP MPs out of a total of eighteen, eight of them in the first round. By contrast, in working-class constituencies that for almost a century were citadels of the left, often of the Communist Party (PCF), the results were disastrous. Picardy returned thirteen far-right MPs out of seventeen; in the Pas-de-Calais, longtime fiefdom of Maurice Thorez – head of the PCF for more than thirty years – the RN claimed ten out of twelve seats, six in the first round. In the Gard, the party won every constituency.|"
no i think it is still broadly a spectrum...I see no reason that voting patterns stop that from being the caseYep. The same thing is happening in the USA. The bourgeoisie votes "left;' the proletariat votes "right." Don't know about you, but afaic that's reason enough to dispense with the obsolete spatial metaphor. Politics is not a spectrum.
seems to be built on an inaccurate assumption - Macron is entirely within his rights to choose/veto the PM. ultimately his party’s result wasn’t as bad as feared and of course nobody got a majority so that has given him some time to stall. probably needs to make some sort of decision before long though or reveal his strategy.The guy posting this thread is a campist and CCP apologist, but he does post some interesting stuff
In this thread he suggests that Macron is refusing to honour the election result and is carying out a slow motion coup.... That Unbowed are obviously not allowed to be in power despite the election result ...
Have a look for yourself and see what you make of it... Includes links to French media
I can't read french but sounds like a call for Everyone Out
Not a given that coalition will materialiseWow. A Gaullist PM from those election results? How the fuck does that work.
So to avoid a vote of no-confidence, he needs the support of either the NPF or National Rally. NPF needs to hold firm here and stick together. Macron really wants to create an alliance between whatever-his-shower-are-called-now, the Gaullists and Le Pen?
Wow.
Looking at the numbers, he can't get a majority without either at least some of NPF or RN. So either Macron thinks the NPF will give in or he is considering an alliance with RN. The maths doesn't allow anything else - NPF + RN > 50% of the seats in parliament.Not a given that coalition will materialise
The dissolution of the French National AssemblyThe dissolution of the French National Assembly is a power granted to the President of the French Republic under Article 12 of the Constitution of the Fifth Republic. It allows the President to end the mandate of the deputies before its normal term and to call for new legislative elections. This decision is usually motivated by political reasons, such as a government crisis or institutional deadlock. The President may only exercise this power once a year, and in the event of dissolution, the re-elected deputies retain their mandate until the end of the following legislature.