Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The big Brexit thread - news, updates and discussion

The poor wee lambs didn't know the full story when they were allowed to have a say.
Thank goodness they got a proper peoples vote later.
Can’t remember the exact words but Giscard in advising the Irish govt said something like the changes needed to be hidden in some long document so that they were impenetrable to the public
 
This is a reading about why the second votes had a different outcome from the first in Denmark and Ireland.
It discusses strategic changes in the campaigns.
There is a theme within the article that seems to be about the impact of the emphasis of different bits of information.
Now in the UK, the broad dismissal with a soundbite (we've had enough of experts) of one aspect of the debate looks like it prevailed.
Had expert and detailed challenge to the 'No' campaign been more to the fore, the vote might have been different. Interestingly it was after the referendum result that a lot of people were saying they didn't feel they had enough information, and indeed the day after the vote wasn't a leading Google question 'What is the EU?'?
Anyway here it is and the Danish and Irish situation don't come over as a population simply being bullied or threatened.

 
the Danish and Irish situation don't come over as a population simply being bullied or threatened.

The Article said:
"In addition to the arguments on the guarantees, the Yes side emphasised the consequences of a second No vote such as potential exclusion from the EU and economic costs. This shift was visible in the choice of slogans as well. In Denmark, the Liberal Party went from ‘Vote Yes!’ to ‘Go for the safe choice, you will not get another chance’. In Ireland too, abstract Yes slogans such as ‘Europe: Let’s be at the heart of it’ were replaced with more dramatic messages such as ‘Ruin versus recovery’."

I think the article doesn't really support your statement - but anyway the main issue wasn't as I remember bullying or threats, it's just .. ignoring the result.
In France the 2005 referendum result was openly ignored and this is still creating demand within France for their own referendum on membership.
 
This is a reading about why the second votes had a different outcome from the first in Denmark and Ireland.
It discusses strategic changes in the campaigns.
There is a theme within the article that seems to be about the impact of the emphasis of different bits of information.
Now in the UK, the broad dismissal with a soundbite (we've had enough of experts) of one aspect of the debate looks like it prevailed.
Had expert and detailed challenge to the 'No' campaign been more to the fore, the vote might have been different. Interestingly it was after the referendum result that a lot of people were saying they didn't feel they had enough information, and indeed the day after the vote wasn't a leading Google question 'What is the EU?'?
Anyway here it is and the Danish and Irish situation don't come over as a population simply being bullied or threatened.

Absolutely , its the hallmark of democracy that if you don't get the right result get better voter insight, a better marketing agency and try, try again. Either that or restrict or expand the vote to those that vote the right way.
 
If the remoaner tag fits, Andrew wears it.
Play the man not the ball eh? Nothing to say about the substance of the article?

1611562245992.png

To be clear as I've said before I abstained in the referendum vote because whilst I was persuaded by some of the Lexit arguements I felt the whole Berxit project was being steered by ideology, xenophobia/racisism and internal struggles that the vermin were having and wasn't really in the wider publlic interest. so what are your actual thoughts on the effect this is having on businesses particularly the smaller ones as described above rather than Rawnsley himself?
 
Play the man not the ball eh? Nothing to say about the substance of the article?

View attachment 251221

To be clear as I've said before I abstained in the referendum vote because whilst I was persuaded by some of the Lexit arguements I felt the whole Berxit project was being steered by ideology, xenophobia/racisism and internal struggles that the vermin were having and wasn't really in the wider publlic interest. so what are your actual thoughts on the effect this is having on businesses particularly the smaller ones as described above rather than Rawnsley himself?
This is akin to me posting an article by Rees mogg and demanding you comment on his hyperbole, straw men and basic bullshit.
 
Case of being careful what you wish for re destroying the EU without a concrete plan for how to replace it. Increased international cooperation, involving increased pooling of sovereignty, is the only real hope for creating the changes we need to survive. A move of power away from the 'Westminster' level, if anything, not towards it. Away from it both upwards and downwards. Internationalism partnered with localism.

The 'Take Back Control' slogan was wrongheaded on several levels.
I agree with the Localism plus Interntionalism sentiment, but in fact Brexit may deliver that by breaking up the Union... That seems key to creating deeper localism. It could have happened within the Union, theoretically, but Westminster is too all-powerful and the Tories too dominant.

Internationalism is always an option, but requires socialist-minded forces in power, not membership of the EU.
 
Last edited:
don't know how, but I know when Greece fell the EU gave it a good kicking. So at least that won't happen, whatever else does happen.

The problem with holding up Greece in these arguments is that Greeks continue to want to stay in, because the memory of the tyranny of being outside it is that strong.

Thinking back to the daily rioting and poverty at the height of the crisis, that is quite extraordinary.
 
I agree with the Localism plus Interntionalism sentiment, but in fact Brexit may deliver that by breaking up the Union... That seems key to creating deeper localism. It could have happened within the Union, theoretically, but Westminster is too all-powerful and the Tories too dominant.

Internationalism is always an option, but requires socialist-minded forces in power, not membership of the EU.
Scottish Indy is another good example of a question in which how something is done and when it is done affects whether or not you should support it. I would have opposed it in the last ref if I were Scottish. It didn't represent anything progressive imo and there was a real danger of an 'independent' Scotland being as dependent on rUK as ever but with less voice, bit like the danger there is to the UK from brexit. But I reckon I'd be voting for independence now. There's nothing in the shitshow that is the UK that is worth clinging on to, and an outward-looking independent Scotland would be more internationalist.
 
The problem with holding up Greece in these arguments is that Greeks continue to want to stay in, because the memory of the tyranny of being outside it is that strong.

Thinking back to the daily rioting and poverty at the height of the crisis, that is quite extraordinary.
There are, I think if I'm counting correctly, 13 members of the EU with dictatorship in living memory.
 
Scottish Indy is another good example of a question in which how something is done and when it is done affects whether or not you should support it. I would have opposed it in the last ref if I were Scottish. It didn't represent anything progressive imo and there was a real danger of an 'independent' Scotland being as dependent on rUK as ever but with less voice, bit like the danger there is to the UK from brexit. But I reckon I'd be voting for independence now. There's nothing in the shitshow that is the UK that is worth clinging on to, and an outward-looking independent Scotland would be more internationalist.

with forty straight years of right wing governments in the UK, when is a good time for anything but now?
(crap rhetorical question: there is always the danger things can get a lot worse, that could include scottish independence too)
 
Understandable, if disappointing to see they have dragged you down to their level.
Fair enough. Most on here who voted leave cant be bothered by remain tantrums any more. There is no good will left.

I will like them move on and leave those dreaming of a greater EU to wallow in their own bile.
 
The problem with holding up Greece in these arguments is that Greeks continue to want to stay in, because the memory of the tyranny of being outside it is that strong.

Thinking back to the daily rioting and poverty at the height of the crisis, that is quite extraordinary.
I always thought that the holding up of Greece as an example was about showing how the EU works in practice rather than the national psyche of the countries that are being sanctioned.
 
Back
Top Bottom