Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

The Ashes 2009

So how badly do England have to play before you make changes?

there are only so many changes you can make though. i don't want to go back to the bad old days when batsmen would get a handful of tests then get dumped for the next flavour of the month batsman. the players from this test havent become bad players overnight, they comfortably beat the windies earlier in the summer and have a fairly decent record between them. they just played shit in this test, that's all.
 
there are only so many changes you can make though. i don't want to go back to the bad old days when batsmen would get a handful of tests then get dumped for the next flavour of the month batsman. the players from this test havent become bad players overnight, they comfortably beat the windies earlier in the summer and have a fairly decent record between them. they just played shit in this test, that's all.
I saw a day of that series at Lord's. West Indies were unbelievably awful. And England lost to them in the winter, remember.

The collective record of England's bowlers is very poor, btw, if you look at their averages.
 
It's not just this match, though. They've been poor all year. What is the justification for keeping Broad, for instance?

He's got a test batting average of around 30 and looks a genuine number 8. Ok his bowling average hasn't been great so far (39ish), but in spells he looks dangerous and he's also young. Harmison (I assume that's the suggested replacement) is a retrograde step in my opinion.
 
He's got a test batting average of around 30 and looks a genuine number 8. Ok his bowling average hasn't been great so far (39ish), but in spells he looks dangerous and he's also young. Harmison (I assume that's the suggested replacement) is a retrograde step in my opinion.
Fuck his batting. Terrible thinking to pick your third seamer on the basis of his batting.

Sorry but 'genuine number 8':D Have you been reading Ashley Giles's memoirs?
 
Fuck his batting. Terrible thinking to pick your third seamer on the basis of his batting.

Sorry but 'genuine number 8':D Have you been reading Ashley Giles's memoirs?

Yeah, that's a bit of a cliche.:oops: Wish I hadn't written it. I still say he shouldn't be dropped and that his batting is important.

It's terrible thinking to pick your third seamer on the basis that he bowled well for two seasons 5 years ago.
 
Yeah, that's a bit of a cliche.:oops: Wish I hadn't written it. I still say he shouldn't be dropped and that his batting is important.

It's terrible thinking to pick your third seamer on the basis that he bowled well for two seasons 5 years ago.
I agree entirely. I don't want Harmison back either.
 
As a neutral, I can't believe you lot went in without Harmison at Cardiff - he's your most menacing bowler by a stretch. Should definitely play at Lords.
 
You still haven't told us what you'd do.
Yes I have. I'd drop Broad and bring in Mahmood, for starters. Play just one spinner, probably Swann, so playing Onions as the fourth seamer.

I'd also drop Cook for someone in form. I'd use wise heads in touch with the county game to decide who that should be.
 
As a neutral, I can't believe you lot went in without Harmison at Cardiff - he's your most menacing bowler by a stretch. Should definitely play at Lords.
At his best he is, yes, but you can only fuck up so many times imo.

At his best, Mahmood is also very menacing.
 
As a neutral, I can't believe you lot went in without Harmison at Cardiff - he's your most menacing bowler by a stretch. Should definitely play at Lords.
Harmison is a perennial annoyance to England fans; the way it works is: he gets dropped for inconsistent bowling, he goes and takes loads of wickets at express pace for Durham, he gets called up for England based on his county form, he plays half of a good match to remind everyone how good he can be, and repeat.
 
Harmison is a perennial annoyance to England fans; the way it works is: he gets dropped for inconsistent bowling, he goes and takes loads of wickets at express pace for Durham, he gets called up for England based on his county form, he plays half of a good match to remind everyone how good he can be, and repeat.

this however is still infinitely better than mahmood who doesn't even take shit loads of wickets in county cricket, and didn't take any for the Lions.
 
What's wrong with Pietersen? First innings he is out playing a shot that would look ambitious in Twenty20, and second he leaves a straight ball. I'm not sure I've seen two such sorry dismissals in test cricket.

Are we allowed to whip our players?
 
Back
Top Bottom