Yep. Still, at least he didn't lose his off-stump shouldering arms this time.Shocking footwork
Heh You think freddie's your best player? Check the stats fool.
gabi is clearly the missing man in the england bowling attack
I'll do that to North then: 50.00.I only quoted his test average
Heh You think freddie's your best player? Check the stats fool.
Heh You think freddie's your best player? Check the stats fool.
You need to look beyond the headline stats. As with Hussey, average 53 but a man in a two-year-long, I would say terminal, slump.
Flintoff got away to a Broad-like start to his test career, averaging over 40 with the ball and under 20 with the bat after his first 15-20 tests. His stats since then make much better reading.
Probably because most of the time he's played the past few years he's played half-fit.Did you see the stat in the guardian this morning? England win more without Fred than with him.
44% win without fred
38% with fred
Did you see the stat in the guardian this morning? England win more without Fred than with him.
44% win without fred
38% with fred
yes, I've seen that. He's missed nearly all England's tests against Bangladesh, though, which skews the stats somewhat. Again, you have to delve deeper to see the true value of stats.Did you see the stat in the guardian this morning? England win more without Fred than with him.
44% win without fred
38% with fred
yes, I've seen that. He's missed nearly all England's tests against Bangladesh, though, which skews the stats somewhat. Again, you have to delve deeper to see the true value of stats.
27.Anyone know the record for number of Test wickets in a day's play?
Did you see the stat in the guardian this morning? England win more without Fred than with him.
44% win without fred
38% with fred
Most got by Aussies probably.was that england or austrailia who got that 'many'?
yes, I've seen that. He's missed nearly all England's tests against Bangladesh, though, which skews the stats somewhat. Again, you have to delve deeper to see the true value of stats.
was that england or austrailia who got that 'many'?