If he'd of taken the 30 days....he had a majority of 23k Chances are he'd still have been an MP. As was, he was calling for Katherine Stone to resign yesterdayIf only Boris had a quiet word with Patterson a few days ago , now old chap, do the decent thing & resign , I'll make you a Lord in a few years when the fuss has died down
He would probably have been re-elected , even if there had been a recall election.If he'd of taken the 30 days....he had a majority of 23k Chances are he'd still have been an MP. As was, he was calling for Katherine Stone to resign yesterday
Painted himself into a corner.
Probably. But the efforts of the last couple of days wouldnt have done him any favoursHe would probably have been re-elected , even if there had been a recall election.
That fucked him , more than the actual griftingProbably. But the efforts of the last couple of days wouldnt have done him any favours
Barwell is suggesting (from his factional standpoint) that another faction used Paterson:That fucked him , more than the actual grifting
DoneI'll report the OP to change the title
Labour, the Lib Dems and the Green Party are discussing standing aside and backing an independent "anti-sleaze" candidate in the by-election prompted by Tory MP Owen Paterson's resignation.
They are all said to be open to the proposal for the seat of North Shropshire, which is usually an ultra-safe one for the Conservatives.
Mr Paterson quit on Thursday amid a row over his breaking of MPs' rules.
No date has yet been set for the resulting by-election.
Opposition parties are looking back at the contest for the seat of Tatton, Cheshire, at the 1997 general election, when former BBC journalist Martin Bell took on - and defeated - Conservative incumbent Neil Hamilton.
Difficult to think of who an anti-sleaze candidate could be tbh.
Yeah, agreed, butI hate this shit. The lack of choice for the folk voting, the idea that you're voting against something/someone rather than for policies or ideas or something. That political parties are even more obviously than normal up for horse trading/playing games. It stinks frankly.
(And I say this as someone who thinks they're all fucking awful.)
Eta It's also a very stupid and short sighted thing to do. Once you potentially encourage your voters to vote for someone else, are they really going to vote for you next time? Maybe but maybe not.
But not the Tories standing aside.
I guess that's where we differ. Labour, Tory, Lib Dem? All shit, all the same, don't care.Yeah, agreed, but
To get rid of the tories at the next election (which is really important), all non-tory parties are going to have to have to agree some sort of pact and stand down to give the others a clear run. The concept of a single "not tory" candidate is something I agree with.
Given it’s a super-safe seat, it doesn’t matter too much, but it might highlight to the public a bit more the level of corruption in this government.Well an anti-sleaze candidate can be an even better sport, but it depends who it is and whether they gain sufficient momentum to mount a real challenge.
Absolutely.I hate this shit. The lack of choice for the folk voting, the idea that you're voting against something/someone rather than for policies or ideas or something. That political parties are even more obviously than normal up for horse trading/playing games. It stinks frankly.
(And I say this as someone who thinks they're all fucking awful.)
Eta It's also a very stupid and short sighted thing to do. Once you potentially encourage your voters to vote for someone else, are they really going to vote for you next time? Maybe but maybe not.
Yeah, agreed, but
To get rid of the tories at the next election (which is really important), all non-tory parties are going to have to have to agree some sort of pact and stand down to give the others a clear run. The concept of a single "not tory" candidate is something I agree with.
Labour have said they'll stand.I can see why Starmer might be tempted not to send out a candidate; could be damaging for him to see vote share actually decline in such circs.