kyser_soze said:Basically Baldwin, you think that it's in people's best interests for their ability to move between countries to be restricted, even if they don't think it's in their best interest.
Those who support open borders and free movement of people - as I do - disagree that anyone, state or individual, should prevent me from moving to, and settling where I wish. Anything else - employment agencies overseas, people trafickers etc, are a side issue to the fact that you think that people shouldn't be allowed to move and work where they want to and others don't.
I distantly recall writing on several threads of this nature how those who are concerned about immigrants becoming a cheap labour pool should have been as proactive as the capitalists and set up advice shops that detailed the wage levels that they should have been asking for, rights to unionise and so on and so forth, but it's only in the last 18 months that any unions or other persons have bothered doing so. Is it the capitalist recruitment agencies fault that, typically, socialists complain to the state, or about the state, for not doing anything but absolutely failing to do anything themselves?
I disagree with Nino in the sense that immigration controls are racist - they aren't if they're applied across the board - but they are certainly against the freedom of persons to travel, work and settle where they please.
kyser...I respect your honesty in putting forwards views that are about protecting the rights and freedoms of individuals.
But as a Socialist, i think you have to look at how those individual freedoms effect others.
And i think it is becoming clearer and clearer to more and more people. Supporting economic migration leads to a much more unequal world.