Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Feminism and a world designed for men

Aspirin used to prevent heart attack in men, but doesn't work in women and is potentially harmful. Oh ffs

Some good meta-analysis work was done on this in 2007 - how old is the book that you are reading, out of interest (it may mention this study if fairly recent)?
 
Some good meta-analysis work was done on this in 2007 - how old is the book that you are reading, out of interest (it may mention this study if fairly recent)?
2019. Perez sites dozens and dozens of studies from all over the world.

Asprin paper was from 2005 and bit about it actually being 'harmful in the majority of patients' was from a 2011 study and 2015 study says low dose of asprin is 'ineffectual or harmful in the majority of women in primary prevention of cancer and heart disease.
 
Looking up this book, I think we might have discussed it before and I put it down on the "to read" list.
(I'm going to need a decent longevity extension book if I'm ever going to make a decent dent in that list...) :oops:
 
Invisible Women was the reason I started this thread - but its taking me ages to read it as every page makes me livid with rage!

Yeah, I think I might have said all of this earlier in the thread about sticking it on the list. The Royal Society rates the book quite highly.

I work in the clinical trials industry and am quite interested in the failings of the whole setup, which are many.

As are a lot of people in the industry tbf.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, I think I might have said all of this earlier in the thread about sticking it on the list. The Royal Society rates the book quite highly.

I work in the clinical trials industry and am quite interested in the failings of the whole setup, which are many.

As are a lot of people in the industry tbf.
I'm a woman taking both aspirin and statins, can you please report back once you have read it?
 
I'm a woman taking both aspirin and statins, can you please report back once you have read it?

I think you might get an answer a few decades earlier by speaking to friendofdorothy :)

I do need to bump this book up the list a bit.. :hmm:

Also, if you’ve been taking this stuff for a bit, I can’t say much aside from finding what you can and speaking to your GP. Cardiac prophylactic stuff is way outside my area.
 
Last edited:
I think you might get an answer a few decades earlier by speaking to friendofdorothy :)

I do need to bump this book up the list a bit.. :hmm:

Also, if you’ve been taking this stuff for a bit, I can’t say much aside from finding what you can and speaking to your GP. Cardiac prophylactic stuff is way outside my area.
No please don't ask me! I can only quote the book. I have little understanding of medical trails, statistics or data, so I'm not the best person to ask. I already had a deep mistrust of medical practice, big pharma and all drugs in general, before I read this book.

When my GP next mentions statins, high blood pressure or diabetes - I will ask if any drug prescribed was actually tested on female humans.
 
I don’t think you’ll find an established statin which hasn’t been tested on female humans at all at this point in time, but asking whether the evidence for effectiveness supports using it for your particular condition might help.

For example, statins are fairly useless in otherwise healthy women for high cholesterol, but are still useful when there is established heart disease*.

*- from a very surface level reading. All “I am not a doctor” type disclaimers apply.
 
I don’t think you’ll find an established statin which hasn’t been tested on female humans at all at this point in time, but asking whether the evidence for effectiveness supports using it for your particular condition might help.

For example, statins are fairly useless in otherwise healthy women for high cholesterol, but are still useful when there is established heart disease*.

*- from a very surface level reading. All “I am not a doctor” type disclaimers apply.

6nzjrl.jpg
 
On the radio today, programme about fad diets. Typically initially only properly tested on obese men, because that's somehow traditional. But, it was claimed, often harmful to women. So, intermittent fasting appears beneficial to both the mental and physical health of men, but, it has been found, causes anxiety and weight gain in women.

(IANAD. What I have typed is a report based on something I heard on the radio. Do not take it as gospel. Do not pass Go. Do not ask admins for my IP address so you can sue me.)
 
... there's no problem so we don't measure it / our service is debased on available data paradox .....infuriating!
Recent (open access) BMJ article 'Gender-related data missingness, imbalance and bias in global health surveys' may be of interest to those who prefer a more conventionally scientific account of some of the issues. It's also a lot shorter than CCP's book. 8ball might find enough time to read it.
 
I'm putting these here to pull away from the medical focus back to broader issues. Just learned a new term "shecession" :(
 
I was talking to a bloke I know the other day about windsurfing, which I've done, & I just found out he teaches. And he was talking about a lad's weekend he and my OH & some other blokes are arranging. And then he said 'we'll take all the boy's toys, windsurfers, surfboards, bodyboards etc'.

Boys toys? Boys toys!!!????

I'd just literally said I used to windsurf myself :facepalm:

I picked him up on it (goodnaturedly), and he still defended his use of the term. Honestly. There is still so much work to do :mad:
 
my thinking - other people's mmv - is that if a book is making you incandescent with anger perhaps it's best to read it all rather than stretch out the anger. it's just an opinion, it's not like i said 'put the book down so you don't get riled so much', which would be a real :rolleyes: moment. the worst things in my view in reading a book for ages with only a page or two read at a time are it's stopping you reading other things and it's very easy to end up not finishing it.
 
The sad thing is that enraging moments rooted in a 'world designed for men' are a daily experience for many women. YMMV.

ETA from the OP
Following on from JudithB 's thread again. Thanks to Poot for bringing up the subject of how the world is designed for men and and Winot for linking to this book Invisible Women Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men by Caroline Criado Perez – Invisible Women

Females are 51% of the population but the world its systems, technology, medicine and so much more are not designed with us in mind. Why?

This issue makes me livid.

... and advice on managing that rage isn't helpful. CCP's book and other sources including this thread are a way of becoming better informed and possibly better equipped to address the source of the problem.
 
Last edited:
my thinking - other people's mmv - is that if a book is making you incandescent with anger perhaps it's best to read it all rather than stretch out the anger. it's just an opinion, it's not like i said 'put the book down so you don't get riled so much', which would be a real :rolleyes: moment. the worst things in my view in reading a book for ages with only a page or two read at a time are it's stopping you reading other things and it's very easy to end up not finishing it.
Been there, done that, read the book... kinda, ok, still reading the book
 
The sad thing is that enraging moments rooted in a 'world designed for men' are a daily experience for many women. YMMV.

ETA from the OP


... and advice on managing that rage isn't helpful. CCP's book and other sources including this thread are a way of becoming better informed and possibly better equipped to address the source of the problem.
Yes. Its not Iike managing my rage will help me or the world. Avoiding being overwhelmed is keeping me alive, which helps me at least, and is giving me time to develop new strategies.

I'm still angry that my mother taught me that expressing anger wasn't ladylike.Took me a long time to realise ladylike= doormat.

It's the same thing as today's blokey advice to 'calm down love'
My anger is not a problem or why I started this thread. On a global scale women's anger, like our voices in general, is routinely ignored. That is the problem.
 
In one of my day jobs I just found an article suggesting one (of many) reasons why women entrepreneurs are less successful than 'entrepreneurs' in general (i.e. men). It's called We Ask Men to Win and Women Not to Lose: Closing the Gender Gap in Startup Funding. You may not have full access but I'm putting it here because the title alone made me cross, let alone the details.

Oh cripes another rabbit hole. You watch Prof Pragya Agarwal talk about her forthcoming book Hysterical: Exploding the Myth of Gendered Emotions livestreamed on Youtube at lunchtime on 15th September via this site.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom