Athos
Well-Known Member
A woman in Canada has done an interesting experiment - in a local council meeting where women and men were pretty evenly represented, she knitted one colour while men spoke and another while women spoke. Fairly predictable results : Knitting shows 'men talk too much'
Women are the worst hit by poverty. I heard on More or Less the other day that when they transferred CB to mothers, the spending on children's and women's clothing increased and spending on men's clothing decreased. So men spend on themselves rather than their children. I suspect if more women were involved at all levels of society, there would be a big shift towards flexibility, better childcare, improved elderly care provision and better services. Women are overwhelmingly responsible for caring in our society so it would benefit everyone if more of us were in decision-making positions. And no, not all women will do that. But the greater the number of women at the top, the greater the chance that some of those more welfare focused policies will start to trickle down.
Whilst I don't share your optimism about what would be achieved by more women in power under capitalism (I think you underestimate the importance of roles in the structure, and overestimate the importance of some facets of the identities of those in the roles), I agree it's something we should try (until capitalism ends), because it's better than nothing, and - when recognised that it's not an end in of itself - can't do any harm.