Wedge issue - WikipediaA wedge issue is a political or social issue, often of a controversial or divisive nature, which splits apart a demographic or population group. Wedge issues can be advertised or publicly aired in an attempt to strengthen the unity of a population, with the goal of enticing polarized individuals to give support to an opponent or to withdraw their support entirely out of disillusionment. The use of wedge issues gives rise to wedge politics. Wedge issues are also known as hot button or third rail issues.
YouGov more or less nailed it. That's not great news.YouGov are using big samples for their polls, but coming up with some very strange figures, Brexit now on a whopping 37% & a lead of 18% over the LibDems, with Labour dropping to 13% & the Tories 7%, surely this can't be right?
I guess we will find out next Monday.
View attachment 171785
2019 European Parliament election in the United Kingdom - Wikipedia
YouGov more or less nailed it. That's not great news.
Absolute fucking cobblers. The idea that you can extrapolate from these results to GE shows that you have no clue what you are talking about.
Like I said before no intellectual honesty.
Clare Regina Fox elected
Absolute fucking cobblers. The idea that you can extrapolate from these results to GE shows that you have no clue what you are talking about.
Have you got even a smidgeon of evidence that Islington North would overturn a 33,00 majority and go LD? A seat where even in 2005 Corbyn had a 6000 majority over the LDs.You can disagree without utterly falling out. All I’m saying and others are saying too, is that the choice is not as clear as you make it and certainly enough to worry the leadership.
You know as a fact that the votes of the 63% of people who didn't vote can't be predicted from last night's results. 100% of the BP voters I know won't vote BP in a subsequent general election, and I don't suppose I'm alone in that.Of course brexit will be a factor in the next GE. To say that European elections will not have a bearing on General elections based on a different situation in the past is intellectual dishonesty.
Have you got even a smidgeon of evidence that Islington North would overturn a 33,00 majority and go LD? A seat where even in 2005 Corbyn had a 6000 majority over the LDs.
Anyone who has the slightest interest in politics/psephology knows that EU elections are terrible predictors for behaviour at GE. LE results are also not very good, but they are much better than EU elections, and where were the most serious Labour losses. Not to the LDs/Grns in strong pro-EU areas but to eurosceptic independents in traditional Labour heartlands like Bolsover.
You think the tories and labour won't be in line for a kicking?. That's the second election after the locals - which didn't count either...You know as a fact that the votes of the 63% of people who didn't vote can't be predicted from last night's results. 100% of the BP voters I know won't vote BP in a subsequent general election, and I don't suppose I'm alone in that.
You've probably missed my edit - my fault not yours - but where, outside Scotland, are these seats?I’m saying it’s unlikely, but it will play on the mind every bit as much as the votes in Northern areas. And even if this is the least likely seat to go there are lots that will be vulnerable to Remain candidates if this continues.
I've not made any such argument.You are right that the probable best way to proceed is a compromise deal and hope the country moves on quickly.
Who has made any such claim?Of course brexit will be a factor in the next GE. To say that European elections will not have a bearing on General elections based on a different situation in the past is intellectual dishonesty.
Sorry, missed the edit you just put in.Who has made any such claim?
I think a load of labour and tory voters sat this one out. A lot of people thought the turnout would be higher, I among them, and I think these results won't be repeated in the next GE. Yes, other parties' share of the vote will rise at the ge but a peculiar aspect of this election is both remain and leave politicians calling for this vote to be treated as a rerun of the referendum. I think you're taking too much from these results without sufficient genuine foundation.You think the tories and labour won't be in line for a kicking?. That's the second election after the locals - which didn't count either...
You've probably missed my edit - my fault not yours - but where, outside Scotland, are these seats?
I've not made any such argument.
And yet the Remain Ultras insist the only way for Labour to win the next GE is for them to become a Remain party.Leave % for top 10 Con-Lab marginals
Southampton Itchen - 60
Pudsey - 49
Hastings and Rye - 56
Chipping Barnet - 41
Thurrock - 70
Preseli Pembrokeshire - 55
Calder Valley - 53
Norwich North - 57
Broxtowe - 53 (Soubry's constituency)
Stoke-on-Trent South - 71
Leave % for top 10 Lab-Con marginals
Kensington - 31
Dudley North - 71
Newcastle-under-Lyme - 62
Crewe-and-Nantwich - 60
Canterbury - 45
Barrow and Furness - 57
Keighley - 53
Ashfield - 70
Stroud - 46
Bishop Auckland - 61
So 15 out of 20 seats with majorities for Leave.
Tbh they will have to decide which way to jump at some pointAnd yet the Remain Ultras insist the only way for Labour to win the next GE is for them to become a Remain party.
It's interesting really, the hardcore Second Referendum lot want Remain on the ballot - but in doing so they're opening the door for No Deal to be the other option.
The problem here is that Leave, and leaving, is a definitive change which opens up possibilities of something different. Remain, meanwhile, appears to be - as the vote was - made up of varying shades which range from 'Let's go back to when things were good in 2012', 'Let's get back to normal', 'Lets undo austerity', Let's build socialism etc etc, which are all in conflict with each other - much like the Remain message in 2016.
Simply saying, 'well people will have changed their minds' is true, and yet the campaign itself to convince the 20% odd in the middle could still fail - meaning the People's Vote campaign could ensure No Deal
Though their position was ambiguous in the past, their formal position now is Softer Brexit. The way I see it, it is a position, but we're in a time of extremes so people claim it isn't - simply because it's not the position they want.Tbh they will have to decide which way to jump at some point
The major problem remain face both in attaining a second referendum and in winning one is that so few prominent remainers refuse to admit there is anything really wrong with the EU. If they did say 'while we're better off in Europe we need to deal with its shortcomings, and a vote to remain is a vote not for the eu of auld but for the UK to fight for an eu in which your concerns have been answered through genuine reforms and not the shitty crumbs cameron thought would fob you off' they'd likely take 10-20% of leavers with them. But that's as likely to happen as man city being relegated next season.It's interesting really, the hardcore Second Referendum lot want Remain on the ballot - but in doing so they're opening the door for No Deal to be the other option.
The problem here is that Leave, and leaving, is a definitive change which opens up possibilities of something different. Remain, meanwhile, appears to be - as the vote was - made up of varying shades which range from 'Let's go back to when things were good in 2012', 'Let's get back to normal', 'Lets undo austerity', Let's build socialism etc etc, which are all in conflict with each other - much like the Remain message in 2016.
Simply saying, 'well people will have changed their minds' is true, and yet the campaign itself to convince the 20% odd in the middle could still fail - meaning the People's Vote campaign could ensure No Deal
The major problem remain face both in attaining a second referendum and in winning one is that so few prominent remainers refuse to admit there is anything really wrong with the EU. If they did say 'while we're better off in Europe we need to deal with its shortcomings, and a vote to remain is a vote not for the eu of auld but for the UK to fight for an eu in which your concerns have been answered through genuine reforms and not the shitty crumbs cameron thought would fob you off' they'd likely take 10-20% of leavers with them. But that's as likely to happen as man city being relegated next season.
We'll see which way they go in the next several monthsThough their position was ambiguous in the past, their formal position now is Softer Brexit. The way I see it, it is a position, but we're in a time of extremes so people claim it isn't - simply because it's not the position they want.
And look how nearly it workedIsn't that Labour's stance from the referendum, though?