Are there any highlights being shown? It’d be shocking if there’s none.
I think Sky Cricket will have them
Are there any highlights being shown? It’d be shocking if there’s none.
Since he turned 30, Anderson now has 404 wickets at 23.36 each. We can safely put to bed any notion that he isn't one of the greatest ever. It gets better though. Since his 35th birthday, Anderson has 192 wickets at 21.06 each. Since turned 38, it is 83 wickets at 21.19. And since his 40th birthday, 15 wickets at 16.93.
Can't help but feel that by the time he turns 50, Anderson will still be bowling, and be taking a wicket with every delivery.
Yeah, the flexibility of mind to abandon the spinners rather than reverting to defensive fields. I'm going to credit the bouncer barrage last night as part of a long-term plan to get the ball reversing. It was reversing loads in the last couple of hours. Ultimately it was that reverse swing that won them the game. But then the final twist was taking the new ball for the spinner as the light was fading. That was a touch of genius.That's an incredible result isn't it. It shows there's a lot more to the new approach than just slogging it around - the aggressive declaration but then having a plan as to how you're going to take wickets with fast-medium pacers on a dead pitch, and having the nerve to stick to it. It's an amazing turnaround.
The crowd at the match says it all. The ground was nearly full at the end - 15,000 people on a work day for a final day at the test when normally it would be empty, and all but about 150 of them Pakistanis. Who knows how many were watching/listening around the country. This is what test cricket is for - worth skiving off work for. None of your evening starts so people can get there after work.Quite staggering.
As for Bazball ruining test cricket. Well, just got back from lunch in the pub and could hear two other tables talking about a game of test cricket. Which I havent really seen since 2005. So fuck the haters
The obvious comparison is Botham. Peak Botham was a match-winning bowler first and foremost. His stats for his first 50-odd tests are staggering and of course include heroics such as Headingley 81. Stokes is a better bat than Botham but not as good a bowler. And of course Botham was a terrible captain. So while there are similarities, there are also big differences.Is Ben Stokes the greatest ever English cricketer? I can't think of anyone else, all in all, he has everything. His stats don't do him justice. Is there anyone comparable? He's certainly the best all round player I've seen in my lifetime anyway.
The obvious comparison is Botham. Peak Botham was a match-winning bowler first and foremost. His stats for his first 50-odd tests are staggering and of course include heroics such as Headingley 81. Stokes is a better bat than Botham but not as good a bowler. And of course Botham was a terrible captain. So while there are similarities, there are also big differences.
Probably best not to try to compare across eras. Stokes is special, and no his stats don't do him justice (although they're not bad), bit like Flintoff before him.
Peak Botham felt like that as well. Was a big part of getting me into cricket as a kid, as Stokes hopefully will be to today's kids - those that get to see him behind the paywall.I dont mean just the skills. He seems to be at the centre of all England's greatest performances. It's a bit silly. Writes his own scripts.
I think Sky Cricket will have them
Best just to observe that this England team contains three all-time greats.
- The series going ahead at all given recent history.
- The whole England side being ill one day before.
- 500+ runs on day one, in 75 overs.
- 4 Centuries on day one.
- Every England player scoring a boundary in the first innings.
- Seven centuries in the first innings.
- A part time spinner taking six wickets on debut.
- Pope scoring 123 runs at 3 and having to keep wicket last minute.
- Brook scoring 240 (181) in his second test.
- Root scoring 9 off an over in which he also batted left-handed
- One of the bravest declarations by an away side in living memory.
- Seamers taking 9 wickets on day four and five in Asia.
- Pakistan going from 259-6 in the 80th over to 268-10 in the 96th over.
- 40yo Anderson taking his first ever wicket in Pakistan, then 4 more in the next innings.
- 5 wickets in the match for Robinson despite recovering from serious injuries.
- Stokes banging in 20 overs with whatever is left of his knees at this point.
- Leach at the death with the last wicket mere moments before bad light.
- The fact that there was any result at all on this road of a pitch.
- 1768 runs in the match with a result, a new all-time Test record.
Are there any highlights being shown? It’d be shocking if there’s none.
When will Anderson retire? Post ashes? That’s what 7 more tests if you assume he won’t play the Ireland one.
He’s close to 700 test wickets, overtaking Kumble to be no 2 test wicket taker and 1000 international wickets respectively. Beating either of these records if he does bow out post Ashes seems a tall order though.
Nicked off Reddit, but sums up the ridiculousness of this victory:
- Every England player scoring a boundary in the first innings.
Knew there'd be something.Pedantic but,
Leach didn't - he got 4 overthrows
Ah I had confused Kumble and Warne whoopsHave to clear that up for you.
3 more wickets and he overtakes Kumble to move 3rd for wickets in all internationals (956-954 atm)
37 more wickets in Tests to overtake Warne and be number 2 of all time in Tests
I dont mean just the skills. He seems to be at the centre of all England's greatest performances. It's a bit silly. Writes his own scripts.
Oh and he's given his match fee to the Pakistan flood relief programme too just to top it off. Top man.
Ben Duckett and Crawley reached 100 without loss in 13.4 overs, the second-fastest hundred first-wicket stand in Tests, and the fastest in the opening innings of a Test, and the third time England have broken their national record for fastest 100 opening partnership in the last five games. The 14.5 overs it took England to reach 100 in the second innings was also in the Top 10 Fastest 0-to-100s in Test history.
England reached 200 in 30.1 and 30.3 overs in their two innings, the third and fourth fastest a team has posted 200 in Tests (and breaking the record for the opening innings of a Test by 26 balls). They passed 300 in 49.2 overs, the second fewest overs required to reach that total - beaten only by South Africa against a very weak Zimbabwe in March 2005, and the fewest in the opening innings of a Test.
They set new records for fewest overs required to reach 400 (in 64.0 overs, by a margin of 4.1 overs), 500 (in 74.4, breaking that record by 15.3 overs), and 600, in 90.2 overs, sledgehammering a barely comprehensible 33.2 overs, or 200 balls, or well over two hours of cricket, off the previous record of 123.4 overs.