Spymaster
Plastic Paddy
Ah, ok. Why though? If the standing umpire didn’t call a no ball that’s it. They don’t review every bowled dismissal.Requested by the umpires not him. Checking the front foot presumably.
Ah, ok. Why though? If the standing umpire didn’t call a no ball that’s it. They don’t review every bowled dismissal.Requested by the umpires not him. Checking the front foot presumably.
Ah, ok. Why though? If the standing umpire didn’t call a no ball that’s it. They don’t review every bowled dismissal.
I was watching and thought "they've overdone the crowd sound effect"I'd almost forgotten what a crowd sounds like!
The stumping was out too. His toe was on the line.
Yep.The stumping was out too. His toe was on the line.
Leach to Sharma earlier.Missed that, earlier or just now?
I thought that was sort of fair. It would have been a strong call to give that out.The stumping was out too. His toe was on the line.
Not on review. It was out. He clearly had nothing behind the line.I thought that was sort of fair. It would have been a strong call to give that out.
3rd umpire needs a demerit point or 4England are in shit here. No flat first two days so 300 plus is huge.
Third umpire is a complete disgrace. I'd make an official complaint if I were England. No excuse for either of those decisions.
They gave England their review back! It was that bad. He should be removed straight away.3rd umpire needs a demerit point or 4
Apparently they wanted to check that the keeper didn't knock them over.Kohli has some confidence to refuse to walk after being clean bowled!
Not to worry, Stokes is at the crease so I presume he'll just dig us out again like that time against New Zealand, which coincidentally was the last time I watched any cricket.
Nae bother
So only another 50% of what the top order managed!That was a wicked catch that got Pope out.
43 to avoid the follow on