With whom? If you mean his vanity project golf course, it wasn't popular with people who live in the vicinity and it isn't being used by golfers.Just idle curiosity, seems he is very popular in parts of Scotland
The whole thing was a parody - Trump's website wasn't hacked and the Trump, CBS News, and Fox News websites were all spoof addresses. Paul Horner isn't a "political analyst," he's somebody who is notorious for pulling this kind of stunt.
So, it's a reaction to nothing?Not a reaction - both petitions were started before he came out with this latest shit.
Remember some of us have been the subject of Trumps ire for a lot longer than this particular campaign has been going.
"Especially"? So, if someone makes ill informed comments about London they should be banned from travelling there? I'd have thought the opposite might arguably be what should "especially" be done.Why, esp given his comments about radicalised areas of London and how the police are frightened of said areas?
Exactly.Don't ban him from London ffs. He will use this as a badge of honour against 'stupid' 'politically correct' UK and get his remarks even more publicity and support
with luck she'll take a tumble and be crushed by the juggernaut's wheelsWoke up this morning to find the name "Ann Coulter" trending. I wonder why...
The vile troll has hopped on the Trump bandwagon naturally.
-sigh-
Oh please no. Trump the martyr.How likely is it that someone could assassinate him? I bet it wouldn't be an open carry zone at his rallies
Oh please no. Trump the martyr.
So, it's a reaction to nothing?
So it's not a reaction, it's a reaction. I see. Either way it's counterproductive, stupid, and gives him and his views even more publicity. It will be taken as a badge of honour.No, its a reaction to his contemptible attitudes and behaviour over a much longer period.
So it's not a reaction, it's a reaction. I see. Either way it's counterproductive, stupid, and gives him and his views even more publicity. It will be taken as a badge of honour.
There are badges of honour that can and should be removed from him, though. He should not be a "Global Scot". That's an honour that should be removed from him immediately by the Scottish Government.
The White House on Tuesday said Republican presidential front-runner Donald Trump's call for the United States to ban Muslims from entering the country disqualified him from becoming president and called on Republicans to reject him immediately.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Trump's campaign had a "dustbin of history" quality to it and said his comments were offensive and toxic.
Earnest said other Republican presidential candidates, who have pledged to support the person who eventually wins their party's nomination, should disavow Trump "right now."
I see a massive long running civil society response to his idiocies.I agree that there is a lot more things that could be done but TBH the will do do something about Trump is very sadly lacking - instead we seem to have got stuck at a tacit acceptance and tolerance of his entire "vision" and worldview, which includes much of his contempt for people.
And remember that Trump himself showed no hesitation when trying to promote bans, restrictions and even direct attacks against anyone who raised even the mildest objection to his activities.
I see a massive long running civil society response to his idiocies.I agree that there is a lot more things that could be done but TBH the will do do something about Trump is very sadly lacking - instead we seem to have got stuck at a tacit acceptance and tolerance of his entire "vision" and worldview, which includes much of his contempt for people.
And remember that Trump himself showed no hesitation when trying to promote bans, restrictions and even direct attacks against anyone who raised even the mildest objection to his activities.
I agree that there is a lot more things that could be done but TBH the will do do something about Trump is very sadly lacking - instead we seem to have got stuck at a tacit acceptance and tolerance of his entire "vision" and worldview, which includes much of his contempt for people.
And remember that Trump himself showed no hesitation when trying to promote bans, restrictions and even direct attacks against anyone who raised even the mildest objection to his activities.
That's not the point though. And it could be trump today and someone who days nasty things about wealth creators tomorrow.
The whole thing was a parody - Trump's website wasn't hacked and the Trump, CBS News, and Fox News websites were all spoof addresses. Paul Horner isn't a "political analyst," he's somebody who is notorious for pulling this kind of stunt.
This is not an interview with Banksy
No, you have to oppose its use even for cunts like Trump. Otherwise, you're not opposing it at all.It probably will be - So for as long as we are stuck with this kind of legislation, why not try to see it gets applied fairly?
It probably will be - So for as long as we are stuck with this kind of legislation, why not try to see it gets applied fairly?