I'm just not getting what you think you're going to achieve with such a personalised attack style of posting. I've started a thread about the census and been upfront from the OP that I've decided not to engage with the process. I appreciate that you disagree with that position; fair enough...but do you really think that the name-calling stuff might change minds?
Honestly, I think your posting on this thread has come across as quite strange. For taking a view that you object to I've been called, amongst other things, a pointless, moralistic petty bourgeois individual/dilettante, a fucking dick, a laughable mess of contradictions, deluded, a 'normally intelligent' conspiraloon who is less of a cunt than a massive cunt (like Dennis Nielsen).
And been accused of talking bollocks, crap, writing tosh, complete and utter drivel (repeatedly) playing into the hands of & supporting the Tories, making false libertarian arguments like Spiked online. Being a personally indulgent lazy cop-out offering a mess of contradictions and false reasoning that I don’t understand equating to a pointless, failed nothing position and sounding like a conspiraloon. Engaged in a personal indulgence about which I’m foolish, repeatedly wrong; wrong on virtually everything, offering no evidence with a desire to get everything completely and utterly wrong whilst scrabbling around pulling any old shit off the internet like a conspiraloon. Offering nothing worthwhile but falsehood after falsehood in a wilfully ignorant and dishonest manner that helps those that I claim to oppose whilst sitting on my arse, doing nothing but bullshit rationalisation that helps to reduce resources in working class areas whilst claiming the moral high ground.
Impressive in it's own way, but not really the way to persuade others of the integrity of your position?
Or maybe I'm just taking an old-fashioned view of how discussions take place. Who knows?
I genuinely thought that posters might like the opportunity to talk about the census.