You appear to have missed the fact that Serb TV admitted and apologized for being a propaganda arm of their murderous government.You appear to have missed out large parts of that link you degenerate.
You appear to have missed the fact that Serb TV admitted and apologized for being a propaganda arm of their murderous government.You appear to have missed out large parts of that link you degenerate.
If Iraq had been able to bomb American media outlets who were cheer leading the invasion for GWB, those outlets would have been legitimate targets.If the Houthis bombed the New York Times or an NPR station would that be legitimate?
Trump's waiting to be able to sign a bill that will eviscerate Medicaid, with healthcare consequences for tens of millions of American kids, maybe he should let somebody else worry about sick British babies.
View attachment 110709
Who'll be macbeth to his donald?Looks like Donald has picked his outfit for when he pops in to the UK
King Donald, has a nice ring to it
But it is unlikely that Kennedy will remain on the court for the full four years of the Trump presidency. While he long ago hired his law clerks for the coming term, he has not done so for the following term (beginning Oct. 2018), and has let applicants for those positions know he is considering retirement. . . .
It's not terribly surprising that Kennedy would consider retirement — indeed, there was some thought he could even have announced it last week, when the court's term ended — but this looks like a pretty good indicator that it will come at some point in President Trump's first term. If Kennedy is considering retiring in 2018, is he really going to stick it out until 2021, when he will be 84 years old? That seems even more unlikely now than it did before.
He'd probably be cheering it on like he did the attempted coup in TurkeyIf the Houthis bombed the New York Times or an NPR station would that be legitimate?
This would tip the Supreme Court very far right:
Analysis | Republicans just quietly got some very good Supreme Court news
This was the real prize in the last election. Whoever won would likely determine the direction of the court for at least the next generation. This is "crossing the streams" bad.
Does it even make much difference when 'RBG' lets the Muslim ban just sail through? What a terrible institution.
Every time i look at this thread there is a new liberal depth being plumbed. It's always this twat and CRI.He'd probably be cheering it on like he did the attempted coup in Turkey
Almost all of the votes over the last decade or better have been 5/4 votes with Kennedy usually the deciding vote. The right has been trying to undermine Habeus Corpus, the fourth and fifth amendments, voting rights, minority rights, etc. All this while expanding the definition of a person under the law to include corporations. (Apparently they even have the right to a religion now.) The only thing preventing things from being much worse is this 5/4 division. This retirement would blow that slim thread away in one blow.
Here's just one case that would have been decided differently:
Obergefell v. Hodges - Wikipedia
I wasn't being entirely serious, just noting how awful it is even now.
LOL!
Buzz Aldrin is known for having a low tolerance of bullshit. Here's an incident from a while ago where he punched a guy for saying the moon landing was fake:
Yes, the GOP leadership have been saying for a while packing the Supreme Court is far more important than what wonder working twit is the tenant in the Whitehouse. That's the main reason the Evangelicals and Republican establishment came to tolerate Trump's nonsense. These people may have voted for an unqualified oaf but are not stupid when it comes to how US politics works.This would tip the Supreme Court very far right:
Analysis | Republicans just quietly got some very good Supreme Court news
This was the real prize in the last election. Whoever won would likely determine the direction of the court for at least the next generation. This is "crossing the streams" bad.
Fuck, this is grim.This would tip the Supreme Court very far right:
Analysis | Republicans just quietly got some very good Supreme Court news
This was the real prize in the last election. Whoever won would likely determine the direction of the court for at least the next generation. This is "crossing the streams" bad.
just offering desperate parents false hope.
That was my thought when i read about it. He's throwing 22 million of health care but he suddenly cares about this one baby.Yep - I guess what he's really trying to do is highlight what Republicans see as the Kafkaesque horrors the Brits have to endure under their socialized medicine system, which their party's healthcare bill is trying to prevent.
There was a war on. Clinton/NATO bombed many Serbian targets. It was a propaganda arm of Milosevic and was a legitimate military target.
NATO bombing of the Radio Television of Serbia headquarters - Wikipedia
Bankers unlike ordinary mortals really hate periods of low volatility....
“Volatility spikes have been hard to predict as they often occur after unpredictable major geopolitical events, such as wars and terror attacks, or adverse economic or financial shocks and so-called ‘unknown unknowns’ (e.g. Black Monday in 1987),” London-based Mueller-Glissmann and Rizzi said. “Recessions and a slowing business cycle have historically resulted in a high vol regime across assets.”
Goldman Sachs puts the chances of a recession in the next two years at 25 percent.
...
Nope, infrastructure isn't a legitimate military target.