frogwoman
No amount of cajolery...
Well, what? What's your opinion? Is it just that Moore submitted another piece while pished, or what?
That some of that piece could be made up.
Well, what? What's your opinion? Is it just that Moore submitted another piece while pished, or what?
That some of that piece could be made up.
That some of that piece could be made up.
Luckily my criticisms of a two child policy are purely recreational and harmless. I don't actually believe it or commit to anything at all in my magazine. Fine. But what about other people less stable, less educated, less middle-class than me? Builders or blacks for example. If you're one of those, my advice to you is to do what your betters tell you to do and shut up. Good luck.
Are we seriously saying that not supporting a social enginerring policy by a female leadership contender makes you a sexist. If you are saying that then fucking come out and say it rather than nudge wink snidey underhand ways of implying it.
people get paid to write this shitHelen Lewis lets her inner Blairite show: http://www.newstatesman.com/helen-l...g-left-cosy-delusion-and-dangerous-insularity
people get paid to write this shit
Helen Lewis lets her inner Blairite show: http://www.newstatesman.com/helen-l...g-left-cosy-delusion-and-dangerous-insularity
Because Lewis has a habit of not committing to any position she might be called to defend later. That allows her and her ilk to shift their ground and hold or discard views on anything as and wen convenient. Typical politician's trick of never being pinned down to anything.
Going through previous stuff by her it really is hard to pin her down on anything other than class solidarity with other rich and privileged women and support for transphobic feminists, even then that is massively qualified by mostly alleging that she is not a transphobic feminist she just spends all of her time being victimised by trans activists.
See also: "I'm not transphobic, I'm just playing devil's advocate"On that issue she is just a bigot posing as a victim imo, in the same way that bigots BNP and some in UKIP say that the real victims of racism are those who dare to speak out against 'anti-white racism'.
This take was particularly tepid.Going through previous stuff by her it really is hard to pin her down on anything other than class solidarity with other rich and privileged women and support for transphobic feminists, even then that is massively qualified by mostly alleging that she is not a transphobic feminist she just spends all of her time being victimised by trans activists.
Someone should point out to her that voting for a coalition wasn't a choice on the ballot papers.What on earth does "those who voted simply for more of the same etc" even mean? What relation does it bear to the election outcome?
I'm really enjoying it
Cass Sunstein has long been one of Barack Obama’s closest confidants. Often mentioned as a likely Obama nominee to the Supreme Court, Sunstein is currently Obama’s head of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs where, among other things, he is responsible for “overseeing policies relating to privacy, information quality, and statistical programs.” In 2008, while at Harvard Law School, Sunstein co-wrote a truly pernicious paper proposing that the U.S. Government employ teams of covert agents and pseudo-”independent” advocates to “cognitively infiltrate” online groups and websites — as well as other activist groups — which advocate views that Sunstein deems “false conspiracy theories” about the Government. This would be designed to increase citizens’ faith in government officials and undermine the credibility of conspiracists.
...
He also proposes that the Government make secret payments to so-called “independent” credible voices to bolster the Government’s messaging (on the ground that those who don’t believe government sources will be more inclined to listen to those who appear independent while secretly acting on behalf of the Government). This program would target those advocating false “conspiracy theories,” which they define to mean: “an attempt to explain an event or practice by reference to the machinations of powerful people, who have also managed to conceal their role.”
In a striking empirical regularity, deliberation tends to move groups, and the individuals who compose them, toward a more extreme point in the direction indicated by their own predeliberation judgments. For example, people who are opposed to the minimum wage are likely, after talking to each other, to be still more opposed; people who tend to support gun control are likely, after discussion, to support gun control with considerable enthusiasm; people who believe that global warming is a serious problem are likely, after discussion, to insist on severe measures to prevent global warming. This general phenomenon -- group polarization -- has many implications for economic, political, and legal institutions. It helps to explain extremism, "radicalization," cultural shifts, and the behavior of political parties and religious organizations; it is closely connected to current concerns about the consequences of the Internet; it also helps account for feuds, ethnic antagonism, and tribalism. Group polarization bears on the conduct of government institutions, including juries, legislatures, courts, and regulatory commissions. There are interesting relationships between group polarization and social cascades, both informational and reputational. Normative implications are discussed, with special attention to political and legal institutions
He also said this about the Abu Dhabi Louvre which as the Guardian itself reported, has been built with slave labour.http://www.theguardian.com/artandde...15/jul/23/museums-should-charge-entrance-fees
The unsayable truth: museums should charge entrance fees
erm why is this "unsayable"? didnt stop him saying it, did it?
Nothing excuses the inhuman working conditions that have been reported. But I suspect that when it opens, this audacious new museum will be admired as a world destination and artistic treasure house. And so it should be.
With any luck, this is the beginning of a global spread of great museums. The world needs a network of cultural oases on every continent, perhaps one day sharing all their collections. That would vindicate the democratic educational dream of the Enlightenment, from which the first world museums grew.
He also said this about the Abu Dhabi Louvre which as the Guardian itself reported, has been built with slave labour.
somewhere in cornwall. It's dedicated to displaying all the crafts and techniques the net-draggers of yesteryear used in their centuries old sea harvesting, its basically a museum to a lost art when there was no engines and you feared the sea with a healthy respect rather than just plowing through it with a massive engine. But no, always the fucking beach so I get sand in my arse crack and my packed lunch
also it covers all the preservation and post-catch industry used to keep pilchads saleable over distance
There's a nice little maritime museum in Polperro, too, on site of old pilchard packing plant. Only small but full of interesting little pieces. Polperro's gorgeous too, spent a veh pleasant week there.
to pilchard oriented museums.
With a couple of neighbours out of season. Lansallos church is really interesting too - amazing carvings on the pew ends.