Pickman's model
Starry Wisdom
nah. he just looks vacant.Despite generally looking about 12, he still has the haunted eyes of a man who has Gone Too Far, and Seen Too Much.
nah. he just looks vacant.Despite generally looking about 12, he still has the haunted eyes of a man who has Gone Too Far, and Seen Too Much.
“There could not have been a lovelier sight; but there was none to see it except a little boy who was staring in at the window. He had ecstasies innumerable that other children can never know; but he was looking through the window at the one joy from which he must be for ever barred."Despite generally looking about 12, he still has the haunted eyes of a man who has Gone Too Far, and Seen Too Much.
Despite generally looking about 12, he still has the haunted eyes of a man who has Gone Too Far, and Seen Too Much.
If you had been booked year after year for the Left Field at Glastonbury, you too would have the Thousand Yurt Stare.Despite generally looking about 12, he still has the haunted eyes of a man who has Gone Too Far, and Seen Too Much.
If you had been booked year after year for the Left Field at Glastonbury, you too would have the Thousand Yurt Stare.
Despite generally looking about 12, he still has the haunted eyes of a man who has Gone Too Far, and Seen Too Much.
I'm liking that term even more than when I 'liked' it yesterday.Dissent entrepreneurs
... and that.Thousand Yurt Stare.
Thing is, that was a real term amongst these people a few years back, but it doesn't mean monetising dissent, it meant actually being able to sell your politics to a modern more inter-connected world. Which is not to defend it, it's a total capitulation to capitalist symbolism. That it would be reduced by the above people to, yeah i can make money off this, that's a good thing, it's why i'm pro-proper capitalism should have been obvious from the start.I'm liking that term even more than when I 'liked' it yesterday.
Dissent entrepreneurs
Didn't know that, cheers Butchers. As well as the origins of the term itself, what you say about it being part of a transition from 'dissent' through to being actively pro capitalist sounds spot on.Thing is, that was a real term amongst these people a few years back, but it doesn't mean monetising dissent, it meant actually being able to sell your politics to a modern more inter-connected world. Which is not to defend it, it's a total capitulation to capitalist symbolism. That it would be reduced by the above people to, yeah i can make money off this, that's a good thing, it's why i'm pro-proper capitalism should have been obvious from the start.
Yeah I saw that this morning and it was probably the only April Fool that "got" me for a few secondsJonnyvoid has posted an April fool piece in which the unions announce they going to defend their members and fight; unbelievable I know, but then has had a storm of protest because he is apparently belittling the suffering.
Jesus fuck the left is fucked
Yeah, well, let's face it, it's probably not every day that he gets told to do something useful with his life.he met a load of urbanites int he pub once, that will do it.
Dissentrepreneurs, surely?
Selling other people's deeply-held principles since Genoa 2001.
I was thinking of possible PD book covers today after seeing that anti UKIP pic.I read the title as "rebel pants" first. I'd be more interested in that book tbh. PD should make one.
..
I was thinking of possible PD book covers today after seeing that anti UKIP pic.
..
I was thinking of possible PD book covers today after seeing that anti UKIP pic.
A hope not hate one. 6 Hitlers in a shopping trolley.Which pic?
PD should launch a book range. We can embrace the principles of Luddism and have all our books hand written in the style of 12th century monks, before the printing press ruined their profession.
The genius of this idea is that each comrade can write every book they sell themselves, having bought a blank book in wh smiths or wherever and we just get dust jackets printed!
So with no labour costs (thank you Ned Ludd) we can sell them cheap!
Jonnyvoid has posted an April fool piece in which the unions announce they going to defend their members and fight; unbelievable I know, but then has had a storm of protest because he is apparently belittling the suffering.
Jesus fuck the left is fucked
Wh Smith comrade? I was sacked for stealing when I worked for them, by a man with a framed photo of Thatcher on his desk. Petty bourgeoisie oppressors of the working classes, and no mistake. The true proletariat buy their notebooks from pound stretcher.
Neda was a bridge character for Western media, which was never good at understanding mass movements, but always loves a photogenic face.
Soi-disantrepeneurs.
No munters in my posho Venezuelan McCarthyite riot porn, sez Molly http://www.buzzfeed.com/mollycrabapple/riot-square-sanctificare
TRIGGER WARNING FOR TOTAL LACK OF SELF-AWARENESS
And it's her job to provide the media with those icons. It's a piece dripping in hypocrisy.Not defending her other stuff, of which I've read little TBH but I thought that article was alright. Just making the point the those with a message, the media have always focussed on some iconic image to present a story.
And it's her job to provide the media with those icons. It's a piece dripping in hypocrisy.
A hyena admonishing others for killing what they eat for their (the hynena's) tea maybe.She didn't seem to be objecting to the iconography she describes. It read more like. This is how it is and if you know what I do, you know I'm part of it. A hyena talking about dinner, perhaps. Ojbectionable enough on it's own terms I spose but still, thought the piece wasn't terrible as a sort of preses.
She didn't seem to be objecting to the iconography she describes. It read more like. This is how it is and if you know what I do, you know I'm part of it. A hyena talking about dinner, perhaps. Ojbectionable enough on it's own terms I spose but still, thought the piece wasn't terrible as a sort of preses.