Thank you - there was I thinking that I was just being exceptionally thick last night while trying to decipher those posts.He has an even harder time posting in academese going by the confused nonsense he posted last night.
Thank you - there was I thinking that I was just being exceptionally thick last night while trying to decipher those posts.He has an even harder time posting in academese going by the confused nonsense he posted last night.
How is it possible to get Lennon wrong? And here, I assume she's attempting to draw comparisons between people protesting against Albuquerque coppers habit of killing people and those in Venezuela and/or maybe Ukraine as well.I am an entrepreneur. I fucking love entrepreneurship. But society as it is now cannot function if most people are entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs need employees. They need infrastructure. They need people to assemble their iphones. To condemn people, as I sometimes see done, to severe financial fuckery, for being the average working stiffs who make the world run, is privileged bullshit I can’t stomach. We ALL have a common cause in fighting the corrupt, anti-competitive oligarchy in power.
This isn’t about whether you wear designer shoes or hate the smell of weed or can’t stand fucking hippies and their drum circles. Its about whether you support an anti-capitalist fuedal-lord grifter class that privatizes their profits but socializes their losses
To quote me some Lennon, who in this instance summed up the mindset of said grifter class magnificently “And you think you’re so clever and classless and free/But you’re still fucking peasants as far as I can see”
One final thought- I’ve seen precious little #ows anger aimed at people like Steve Jobs who Got Rich Making Stuff. The anger I’ve seen at #ows is primarily aimed towards people who got rich through shifty math, scamming, and government connections
That's your basic rich-girl market-libertarianism isn't it? Here's something on Steve 'doing capitalism proper'Jobs btw: Newly unsealed documents show Steve Jobs’ brutal response after getting a Google employee fired
http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/1bo9lw/i_am_molly_crabapple_an_artist_who_documents/future_mr_crabapple 1 point 12 months ago
So how much money do you make a year with your many different projects? But seriously, you seem to have the ideal life of being yourself and doing what you love to do. Is it all for the art or is the Molly Crabapple empire not get out of bed for less than $25k? It's wrong for you to hold out with vital financial information if we are to be married one day.... PS Sorry I missed your AMA and hope you reply with your drunken guard down.
mollycrabapple 8 points 12 months ago
I gross six figures a year, but expenses like giving my employees benefits chip away at that. Generally it's a matter of working for free for the righteous and charging lots to for profit places.
If you want to marry me you have to fight Fred first
And I bet a lot of those expenses are tax deductible too."Expenses like giving my employees benefits"
A benevolent lady of the manor. Christmas bonus for the groundskeeper.
And I bet a lot of those expenses are tax deductible too.
"Expenses like giving my employees benefits"
A benevolent lady of the manor. Christmas bonus for the groundskeeper.
*enlightenment dawns* That would certainly explain why some Americans have called me everything from unpatriotic to communist for expressing what seemed only slightly left of centre ideas. eg suggesting that all the tenants in the same block clubbed together to pay for the removal of a large wasp nest on a communal landing instead of leaving it to the one whose front door was nearest.It's an American liberal thing. <snip>
It's an American liberal thing. Entrepreneurs and capitalists are good; corporations and monopolies are bad. They think there's a contradiction between these two groups.
I think I've finally worked out why I dislike Suey Park. For reasons like this:
Her degree of involvement in a hashtagged cause, she said, depends on how much “free time” she has at the moment, and whether a particular issue piques her interest. “It’s not like I enjoy missing ‘Scandal’ to tweet about ‘The Colbert Report,’” she said.
Park suggested that she, like West, is playing to a part and, in the process, satirizing what we might expect from a twenty-three-year-old hashtag activist. “There’s no reason for me to act reasonable, because I won’t be taken seriously anyway,” she said. “So I might as well perform crazy to point out exactly what’s expected from me.”
I know she does other work outside of Twitter but her attitude just rubs me the wrong way, again she must be the focus of the story. That NewYorker piece is a good read.
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blo...witter-campaign-to-cancel-colbert-report.html
how long have you been on urban? haven't you yet realised that we discuss everything - and nothing?I've not been following this thread as closely as some but what I don't get is why she's seen as important at all? I don't really see a problem with what she's saying there as far as it goes - so she sticks some stuff up on twitter when she can be bothered, nothing wrong with that in itself - but how does it get to the point where we're discussing her?
i thought you could read without moving your lipsOwen has me trying to say 'people power' without moving my lips. That's the rest of the morning gone.
here's a picture of a gormless owen jones not wearing a checked shirtis teh checked shirt supposed to be a signifier, i wonder. or does he just like checked shirts.
That fucking shirt.