Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

"Victims of grooming gangs want action"...headline today on the BBC

Oborne is a strange one. He's been extremely vocal about Palestine for decades and forthright recently about the genocide. He's something of a dissenting right winger.

The fact that someone isn’t on your “team” doesn’t automatically make them your enemy.

The fact that someone is on your team doesn’t necessarily mean they are your friend.

I think I may have committed urban sacrilege…
 
We know about his shitty agenda. At least, those who recall his posts on the inevitable destruction of British identity do.

There isn't a single thing I have ever said on this site that I would retract. And there is not a single thing you could quote me having said that contains any hatred whatsoever, even though that is what you are implying.
 
Forgive me if I've misunderstood you, but are you saying you believe there should be a standard of beyond reasonable doubt for a restaining order to be handed out? Would you say that if you had ever needed to take one out against a person?
I'd say that there is something in between 'beyond reasonable doubt' and 'on the balance of probabiliities'. Something like 'strong prima facie cause'. In practice, I suspect that this is what 'on the balance of probabilities' actually amounts to most of the time.
 
The fact that someone isn’t on your “team” doesn’t automatically make them your enemy.

The fact that someone is on your team doesn’t necessarily mean they are your friend.

I think I may have committed urban sacrilege…
All I can say is that your name is going down in my little black and red notebook. Just hope that the revolution does not come in your lifetime.
 
You are also presumung to speak for thousands of people.
I have not made any such presumptions as i do not know them.
I have however read quotes from a letter co-signed by three of the Telford survivors that say those who ‘weaponise our pain for their own ends or political gain” should “hang their heads in shame”.
 
I don't need to tell anyone anything. I have first hand experience seeing the effects of what these monsters do.
So do many people; you don't have the right to speak for others who have first hand experience of abuse.
Well, you do, but then people have the right to pull you up on it.
 
Wjhat I would say though, and I won't go on much more because it's past midnight, when women have to walk around their town and risk bumping into the men that gang raped them, knowing that they will never have justice bought against them, the philosophising seems rather insignificant.

No one here thinks that is a tolerable state of affairs. We are arguing that some of the most obvious solutions that spring to mind also lead to dark places.

Ps: apologies if I’ve spoken for some posters out of turn
 
There isn't a single thing I have ever said on this site that I would retract. And there is not a single thing you could quote me having said that contains any hatred whatsoever, even though that is what you are implying.
I wouldn't presume to interpret your emotions, or whatever passes for emotions in the boggy mess that inhabits your skull. I said nothing about hatred. But you are a fuckwit racist, as anyone looking at your posts can see.
 
The fact that someone isn’t on your “team” doesn’t automatically make them your enemy.

The fact that someone is on your team doesn’t necessarily mean they are your friend.

I think I may have committed urban sacrilege…
Just makes me wonder why he writes for The Mail. I heard him interviewed recently on Al Jazeera while he was visiting the West Bank. He was a powerful advocate for the Palestinian cause. I do find it a bit odd.
 
I have not made any such presumptions as i do not know them.
I have however read quotes from a letter co-signed by three of the Telford survivors that say those who ‘weaponise our pain for their own ends or political gain” should “hang their heads in shame”.

Both my position and yours are held by the people abused. Both positions should be allowed to be aired.
 
These are interesting philosophical questions, and I won't dismiss them out of hand, but debating the finer details of epistemology might be more suited to a different thread. I'd be happy doing that at some point.

Wjhat I would say though, and I won't go on much more because it's past midnight, when women have to walk around their town and risk bumping into the men that gang raped them, knowing that they will never have justice bought against them, the philosophising seems rather insignificant.
And there are plenty of men who'll philosophise on their situation and talk over them and talk on their behalf.
 
I wouldn't presume to interpret your emotions, or whatever passes for emotions in the boggy mess that inhabits your skull. I said nothing about hatred. But you are a fuckwit racist, as anyone looking at your posts can see.

I'm tempted to put you on ignore but I feel it necessary to see the views of people like you. Your attitude is exactly what led to so many people gstting let off scott free. It's actually despicable.
 
[
The report says that the evidence is inconclusive
That's what the executive summary says.
The main body goes onto a more detail also summerised in key findings

Key findings: • Research on offender ethnicity is limited, and tends to rely on poor quality data. It is therefore difficult to draw conclusions about differences in ethnicity of offenders, but it is likely that no one community or culture is uniquely predisposed to offending. • A number of studies have indicated an over-representation of Asian and Black offenders in group-based CSE. Most of the same studies show that the majority of offenders are White
 
Indeed; the Rotherham thread would be a useful read for anyone new to the topic or unsure about why the police were so bad at their job...

Did you read this link at all, burtabraham ?
 
Just makes me wonder why he writes for The Mail. I heard him interviewed recently on Al Jazeera while he was visiting the West Bank. He was a powerful advocate for the Palestinian cause. I do find it a bit odd.

I’m not sure whether it is odd or not tbf.
What is considered a right or left wing stance and the topics emphasised by different publications seems to be something that has been fairly elastic over a career-length timeline.
 
Just makes me wonder why he writes for The Mail. I heard him interviewed recently on Al Jazeera while he was visiting the West Bank. He was a powerful advocate for the Palestinian cause. I do find it a bit odd.
His book the Fate of Abraham explains this in detail and is a good book that covers the demonisation of Muslim people in the UK and America. He also explains how he got to his position now from someone who was very proud of the empire etc. I went into it blind and thought it was a good book. He also covers this subject.
 
Last edited:
Well, you do claim that these rapes were racist acts.

From the testimony of a survivor:

When I was being beaten I was being called a white slag a white whore a white cunt, that over and over again the references to my whiteness was always at the forefront of my perpetrator's mind and that that was always linked in with religion and his idea of what a good Muslim was and a bad non-muslim was [...]
[...] in the minds of these grooming gangs, if you're not covered down to your ankles down to your wrist if it's hem of your top doesn't cover to your knees then you're asking to be raped [...]
[...] so there's lots lots of narratives within these grooming gangs which make hatred of white people a justification for what they're doing
 
also worth remember in all of this and reform member/ tommy Robinson fanbois might not like it but guess which ethnicity is most like to be a sex offender

actual-sexual-crime-child-sex-crime-stats-reform-cult-v0-mpbyvqit8tbe1.png


source is a freedom of information request from the justice department with figures to 2020 btw**


Stats like these are not so meaningful or useful as you might think ... in a UK society that has a 2021 census citing the population of white men as 10 times that of for example Asian men. Your interpretation is not correct.
 
Aladdin the figure of white sex offender and sex offender with convictions for offences is higher than the 10 percent variance you just remarked upon :hmm:

oh they are just more white people does not match the figures I'm sorry to say
 
Aladdin the figure of white sex offender and sex offender with convictions for offences is higher than the 10 percent variance you just remarked upon :hmm:

oh they are just more white people does not match the figures I'm sorry to say
Look..



Do I have to do this??

10000 white men convicted. Out of a population of 23,847,340
white men (not including people who are white Irish* or white other* is not what you think it is.

Do I need to now compare convictions of the other ethnic groups in relation to their population size ? Don't make me do this.

*census terminology not mine
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom