I've read that blog. Interesting ...and informative... thanks
Sweet FA . I hope more information becomes available.
This next article came up on further searching. It's from a channel.4 fact check article. References CEOP. Child Exploitation and Online Protection. 2017.
FactCheck looks at what we know about the ethnicity of sexual abuse gangs.
www.channel4.com
It discusses type 1 abusers and type 2 abusers. Type 1 .
Type 1” group abuse involves targeting a victim, or victims, based on their vulnerability.
Type 2” group abusers are defined as having “a longstanding sexual interest in children”.
The only mention of race indicates towards whites and Asians.
But the information is possibly of interest to the thread readers. I'm not equipped to delve thoroughly. But it does state that in their research 100% of Type 1 abusers prosecuted pedophiles were white. That's one figure. It seems unbiased as a report.
Here's a quote ..
"75 per cent of recorded Type 1 group abusers, who target victims based on their vulnerability, were Asian
. The Office for National Statistics estimates that 7.5 per cent of the UK’s population are Asian.
17 per cent of Type 1 offenders were white, compared to 86 per cent of the UK population.
There were six recorded cases of Type 2 group abuse.
100 per cent of recorded Type 2 group offenders, who abuse children because of long-standing paedophilic interest, are white.
Type 1 groups tend to be larger: the majority involve groups of four abusers, compared to Type 2 abusers, who tend to act in pairs. That means in terms of raw figures, there are more Asian men carrying out group abuse than white men (229 compared to 70)
It’s worth saying that CEOP itself doesn’t believe this data is a comprehensive picture of group abuse and exploitation in the UK. They warn against drawing too many conclusions from this data."
What do we know about the ethnicity of sexual abuse gangs?
I did try to find the actual CEOP reports. But the link in the article to CEOP was going to a missing site page.