Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Urban v's the Commentariat


Yes, although she is complaining that the interview has been heavily edited and presented in a way that's designed to give an impression of mumbling incoherence. There's a certain obvious truth to that: it's an editorial choice to leave in the "ums" and sentence fragments and other features of off the cuff spoken communication. If you want someone to look good, you clean that up for print. If you want to make them look addled or stupid you emphasise them. And that works on almost everyone, because very few people can speak in fully formed paragraphs, without making filler sounds, without abruptly changing direction occasionally in the middle of a sentence and so on.

That said, the core issue with the interview isn't the hostile way in which her speech patterns are reported, but the apparent incoherence of her underlying politics. She does seem more radical than her fellow "feminist of color" twitter saint Mikki Kendall, but then again people were defending Kendall's radicalism right up until she explicitly pointed out that she doesn't have a radical political outlook during her hail to the NSA, #solidarityisfordroneoperators meltdown. I would actually be interested in hearing what Park's wider political outlook is in a less hostilely presented and more thorough interview.
 
I supose this is just hating on successful WoC's, but...

I had to cancel a whole week of gigs, and I haven’t been able to leave where I’m staying in six days due to the amount of threats I am getting. [I lost] $4,000 that I would have made in my speaking gigs...

she earns $4k a week? When did being a revolutionary become so profitable? #wearethe5%
 
Fucking hell. Malkin is asinine.

mmalkn.png
 
I mean that - she's openly racist and islamophobic and was part of that anti ground zero mosque thing iirc.
 
Malkin and the Sinister Crescent!
In 2005, Malkin took a pre-eminent role in an astoundingly dumb controversy regarding a proposed memorial for Flight 93. Dubbed "Crescent of Embrace," it consisted primarily of a stand of trees partially surrounding the crash site. The design was selected by a panel composed of design experts and victims' family members, and it was announced on September 7.[4]

Shortly after the announcement, a group of Internet obsessives - Malkin among them - came to the conclusion that the Memorial was actually a covert memorial to the terrorists.[5] Why? Because it's a big red crescent, ahistoric symbol of Islam![6] With such clear facts, all Malkin had to overcome were the families, all of whom were sure the claims were utter bunk.[7] Of course, Malkin is not one to let something as petty as the stated desires of the grieving get in her way.

The dreaded crescent was not a particularly long-term campaign, for Malkin or anyone else. Today, the only ones who want to talk about it are the mentally unstable sons of renowned political theorists.[8]
 
I have been told this piece is 'beautiful' and 'important'.

Apparently white men having beards is a form of cultural appropration. Although that said it touches on some decent points about racial sterotypes and machismo among the gay community.

Again the authour is from a well to do background educated at an elite university. Giving workshops for fellow idle children of the rich at elite universities.

His tedx talk iis revealing in who is audience is and what he thinks the revolutionary potential might be

 
I have been told this piece is 'beautiful' and 'important'.

Apparently white men having beards is a form of cultural appropration. Although that said it touches on some decent points about racial sterotypes and machismo among the gay community.

Again the authour is from a well to do background educated at an elite university. Giving workshops for fellow idle children of the rich at elite universities.

His tedx talk iis revealing in who is audience is and what he thinks the revolutionary potential might be



I have no idea what he's on about but it sounds like a kind of hybrid of the worst elements of hippyism and post-modernist bollocks.
 
Back
Top Bottom