there's no point having places like that if you can't put nuclear weapons on high alert from them now and againHadn't thought putting nukes on high alert was anything but theatre. But it turns out he's done that from a nuclear bunker in the Urals. OK.
Hadn't thought putting nukes on high alert was anything but theatre. But it turns out he's done that from a nuclear bunker in the Urals. OK.
badly. everyone will handle it badly. and shit will get worse. fuck knows what will happen after that, it'll all get unimaginably bad. never thought we'd be talking about 'this city might get wiped from the face of the map' without it being a light-hearted what ifIf he nukes Kiev in a fit of pique, I'm not sure how I'm going to handle this.
Or how anyone will.
yep. But other bits of the article suggest its not just the ruminations of irrelevent old men.Its not exactly a surprising statement from them about this war either, given that the article you linked to is clear enough about how long they've been making noises opposing Putin:
yeah, i'd be pretty cross at thatIf he nukes Kiev in a fit of pique, I'm not sure how I'm going to handle this.
Or how anyone will.
pub it is then.Hadn't thought putting nukes on high alert was anything but theatre. But it turns out he's done that from a nuclear bunker in the Urals. OK.
Indigenous Anarchist Federation of North America any good?
what do you mean, someone who will continue whatever it is in Ukraine but do a better job? i very doubt that.what happens next is he has an unfortunate 'accident' and someone more militarily competent takes command. seems to me much more likely than some fairy godmother of a general takes over and lo! with a tap of the wand magics everything ok
badly. everyone will handle it badly. and shit will get worse. fuck knows what will happen after that, it'll all get unimaginably bad. never thought we'd be talking about 'this city might get wiped from the face of the map' without it being a light-hearted what if
yeh but then you've not been paying attention to some of what's been said eg the leaving of the top troops outside the first echelons committed. the peculiar use of armour without obvious infantry and infantry without armour. the way air superiority not assured before committing ground forces. the way things haven't been joined up, combined arms not combined. shitty ilyushin airplanes shot out the sky. it wouldn't take that much to get things moving in a more effective way i think. and if putin can't do it, if shoygu and gerasimov can't assure it, i'm sure other generals can be found who will.what do you mean, someone who will continue whatever it is in Ukraine but do a better job? i very doubt that.
yeh but this isn't now outlier discussionIts not a serious part of the current analysis of Putins nuclear rhetoric at this stage at all. His rhetoric is seen as a typical response that is more about complaining about the extent of sanctions and underlining the reason why Ukranian appeals for NATO countries to impose a 'no fly zone' in Ukraine are a non-starter.
yeh i think thats ridiculous, the idea that Putin will be ousted by someone who wants to carry on with his Ukraine plan but do it better.yeh but then you've not been paying attention to some of what's been said eg the leaving of the top troops outside the first echelons committed. the peculiar use of armour without obvious infantry and infantry without armour. the way air superiority not assured before committing ground forces. the way things haven't been joined up, combined arms not combined. shitty ilyushin airplanes shot out the sky. it wouldn't take that much to get things moving in a more effective way i think. and if putin can't do it, if shoygu and gerasimov can't assure it, i'm sure other generals can be found who will.
do you really?yeh i think thats ridiculous, the idea that Putin will be ousted by someone who wants to carry on with his Ukraine plan but do it better.
Is it impossible that there’ll be a coup in Russia, deposing putin?
yes. its ok if you want to apologise to me for saying that i was having a laugh when i suggested he'd be ousted, when you now think i was right.do you really?
yeh but then you've not been paying attention to some of what's been said eg the leaving of the top troops outside the first echelons committed. the peculiar use of armour without obvious infantry and infantry without armour. the way air superiority not assured before committing ground forces. the way things haven't been joined up, combined arms not combined. shitty ilyushin airplanes shot out the sky. it wouldn't take that much to get things moving in a more effective way i think. and if putin can't do it, if shoygu and gerasimov can't assure it, i'm sure other generals can be found who will.
Yes, I'm sure a restructuring of Russia's military at short notice is totally feasible. Wtf?
no, i don't think you're right. i don't think that this is in any way right:yes. its ok if you want to apologise to me for saying that i was having a laugh when i suggested he'd be ousted, when you now think i was right.
as i say in 3349 yer man having an unfortunate 'accident' and someone else more militarily competent is much more likely that everything getting magicked better as you think will happen. that's not in any way agreeing with you.I've convinced myself at least for the moment that this is what happens next, he has an unfortunate accident very soon, forces withdraw from Ukraine, and god knows who gets to be the new Putin.
yeh but this isn't now outlier discussion
is that confirmed? was a twitter rumour yesterday.Russian Military Chief of Staff, Gerasimov, sacked.
He was the bullet faced one who, at the briefing with Putin looked like a bulldog licking piss off a thistle....
I'm assuming that means all is going well.
His thermobaric stuff makes me a bit windy.This is the bit that worries me too Its a worrying escalation he doesn't now seem worried about making the type of threats to the world that North Korea make
At least a new long return to the cold war days , the 80s were very worrying times and never thought I would hear a world leader besides the likes of Kim Jong un Kim Jong-un use these threats again to a world especially when actually at war
He has obviously still got lots of horrific conventional mass murder weaponry he could still use towards his crazy goal or legacy if he really is losing and powerful enough to stop those around him halting him
Perhaps even conventional weapons weve never seen before as hes hinted at too but surely wont using those be a huge risk towards a preemptive attack on Russia and the possibility of an all out nuclear conflict
On a bit of lighter note but not much as seen it mentioned I also have When wind blows book by Raymond Briggs the cartoon movie is well worth streaming too excellent read or watc though frightening reality of nuclear war
Russian Military Chief of Staff, Gerasimov, sacked.
He was the bullet faced one who, at the briefing with Putin looked like a bulldog licking piss off a thistle....
I'm assuming that means all is going well.
The therapy AS torture option, maybe?The therapy or torture option?
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
Its not a great idea to instantly believe that sort of news when it first emerges in the midst of a war.