Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

UK captains of industry have charity night where they sexually assault young female 'hostesses'

Status
Not open for further replies.
Perhaps if you put your thinking head on, instead of the one you have on, and consider this. If the first woman who was groped had slapped the groper's face, and declared loudly 'Do no put your hand on my...', it may well have changed the behaviour of the evening. By remaining silent they did neither themselves, or women in general, any good.
Late to the party, but just caught up with this.

Urgh, you utter prick. Absolutely repulsive.
 
Perhaps if you put your thinking head on, instead of the one you have on, and consider this. If the first woman who was groped had slapped the groper's face, and declared loudly 'Do no put your hand on my...', it may well have changed the behaviour of the evening. By remaining silent they did neither themselves, or women in general, any good.

You really are a nasty piece of work aren't you?
 
I spent 14 years in the army, and attended many alcohol fueled events where women, both as guests and waitresses were present, and the sort of behaviour as in the OP did not happen. It would not have been tolerated for a second. Anyone behaving like that would have been ejected, and been answering for it on the next working morning. Funny that, those neanderthal squaddies completely understood what was acceptable, yet their so called betters do not.

I guess all those people who've told me about getting groped and hassled by gangs of pissed squaddies were talking out of their arseholes then. And to be fair, they were all asking for it anyway right? For being unwilling to start a physical confrontation with a highly trained people slaughtering specialist? They should've just grown some balls and fought their way out of there right?
 
If children are aware of and respond to the culture around them then it should be seen as a good sign. The point in parents is to help them rise above it rather than be horrified by their children reflecting it.
 
There is no defensible 'but'. Being serious for a moment, rather than the 'piss taking' posts above, it is never acceptable to lay hands on another person without their consent. I was taught this by my father, and have followed it all my life. No means no, not maybe or yes.

Men are physically stronger, this generates the assault; women get ripped to bits in court, this engenders the pathetic conviction rate for such offences. We had a case some years back in Scotland, where a rape victim had to hold up in court, the underwear she had been wearing the night of the attack. Shortly afterwards she took her own life. Until there is law in place to protect women, the conviction rates will remain low. That is a disgrace.
There are already laws in place to protect women. What law do you want - a law that says 'don't be a rapist'? We already have that.
 
And Sasaferrato did it ever occur to you that the groper's face wasn't slapped because of the fear he might do something worse if she did? That she'd lose her job? That she was frightened?

There are countless reasons why it didn't happen. You're not a woman. You've not ever been in that situation. You won't ever be in that situation. So stop making out you know it would all have been better if they'd only done X, Y or Z.
 
If children are aware of and respond to the culture around them then it should be seen as a good sign. The point in parents is to help them rise above it rather than be horrified by their children reflecting it.
Which is why my sister then patiently explained that boys and girls could both do whatever jobs and reminded him that their GP was a woman and the doctor he saw in hospital was a woman and Uncle Jim is a nurse etc etc.

So you know, it's perfectly possible to be horrified by something as well as helping a child reflect on it . :rolleyes:
 
And Sasaferrato did it ever occur to you that the groper's face wasn't slapped because of the fear he might do something worse if she did? That she'd lose her job? That she was frightened?

There are countless reasons why it didn't happen. You're not a woman. You've not ever been in that situation. You won't ever be in that situation. So stop making out you know it would all have been better if they'd only done X, Y or Z.
As well as the obvious why the fuck should you have to. :facepalm:
 
We were given a dolls house as a couple of brothers in non gender normative 70s household without a TV. Used to play cowboys and indians using lego men running through the house. Nature is often stronger than nurture.

Yeah? I used to stick on my uncle's bike leathers, and we would reinact the scene from T2 my friend would be Sarah collapsing in the lift and I would be like "come with me if you want to live" in a flat weirdly full of single mothers and daughters. We also knew the script of The Lost Boys backwards. Gore is just more fun :D
 
Nobody plays cowboys and indians via "nature". There's no cowboy gene. It just shows how pervasive cultural influences are and how much children pick up on them regardless of what their parents try to do.
That's a very big statement. You're completely denying the possibility that nature may be one of the factors that predispose boys to playing more aggressive games?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom