If I were a betting man, I'd be backing a R:L result of low 60's to high 30's, but 51:49 has to be the dream 'tory-killer' scenario.Yep. That said, pretty much any result is going to cause trouble for them.
Ironic spelling mistakes ahoy!
Politicalbetting.co.uk said:There’s a new YouGov poll out which has REMAIN back with in lead from the level pegging. Actual figures are 40% to 39% so all within margin of errot.
If I were a betting man, I'd be backing a R:L result of low 60's to high 30's, but 51:49 has to be the dream 'tory-killer' scenario.
That's about my guess as well. Respective turnout for yes and no will (obviously) be important but it's hard to get a feel for that, the whole campaign on both sides feels a bit flat. Ultimately though, a significant victory for remain. Also, very few if any defections from tory to ukip. Whole thing has a damp squib feel, except for firming up some of the tory divisions.If I were a betting man, I'd be backing a R:L result of low 60's to high 30's, but 51:49 has to be the dream 'tory-killer' scenario.
If I were a betting man, I'd be backing a R:L result of low 60's to high 30's, but 51:49 has to be the dream 'tory-killer' scenario.
Allows them to suggest they're concerned for the good of the nation when they ask capital how high they should jump.There's more than a few posters on this board who are going along with that type of message, as the last couple of pages of this thread show - "instability in the markets"
Yes, the radical free-market fundamentalism of the Conservative rebels comes up against the innate conservatism of much of their core support. I think there's some in the bubble who are mistakenly interpreting the high degree of Brexitism amongst local tory activists as indicative of widespread Leavism amongst their voters.My suspicion is that the DKs - the ones who are going to decide this - are going to go with remain out of fear they'll lose money and what they and their cheerleaders will paint as 'being pragmatic'. In reality, that means they don't really care and want to be left alone with as little change to them as possible. That sort of approach is not going to be attracted to leave, to what is being portrayed across almost the entirety of the establishment, of those who have a public voice, as a risk, or worse as A THREAT.
Neither of course, the question as regards this should really be what best will help disorganse the forces of neo-liberalism across europe and globally?So the question for the left is - Who best to protect us from the inequities of neo-liberalism - the Daleks of the ECB or Atlanticist headbangers like Johnson and Farage?
8% rise in income tax if we exit according to Osborne. Clown.
I was just about to post that8% rise in income tax if we exit according to Osborne. Clown.
It's fun to watch Osborne turn his raw sewage cannon on his party's own base like this.
I mean, we on the left have been putting up with this for years - almost total fabrications, over-simplifications, outright lies and made-up numbers with only a tangential relation to reality released as a barrage on the public like an aerial bombardment of heavy bullshit bombs.
And it was all cheered on and repeated as gospel as the very people being subjected to it now.
A man of more generous spirit than me wouldn't laugh...
What do we think turnout might be? Would a narrow win for either side on a below 50% turn out likely lead to questions of legitimacy from the losers?
Definitely, and if in the unlikely event of leave wins it will be used in order to make the case for a second vote.What do we think turnout might be? Would a narrow win for either side on a below 50% turn out likely lead to questions of legitimacy from the losers?
Remain winning, with less than 50% of the electorate + treasury hysteria will feature heavily in falange's post result speeches.What do we think turnout might be? Would a narrow win for either side on a below 50% turn out likely lead to questions of legitimacy from the losers?
I don't think the tory & ukip leaves will be too bothered about having a logical argument for the illegitimacy of a narrow remain on a low turnout. They are swivel-eyed loons afterall!Its going to be a lot lower than the Scotish referendum. I can see some logic in Remain bitching about turnout if they lose, I don't see how that would work for Leave
I don't think the tory & ukip leaves will be too bothered about having a logical argument for the illegitimacy of a narrow remain on a low turnout. They are swivel-eyed loons afterall!